Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TTRX vs ABBV vs REGN vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
TTRX vs ABBV vs REGN vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $119M | $367.80B | $75.16B | $8.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $61.16B | $14.92B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $4.23B | $4.42B | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | — | 70.2% | 84.5% | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 26.7% | 24.3% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.6x | 15.6x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $80K | $69.07B | $2.71B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $5.23B | $3.12B | $214M |
TTRX vs ABBV vs REGN vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 224.4 | +124.4% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 118.0 | +18.0% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 93.9 | -6.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTRX vs ABBV vs REGN vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTRX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ABBV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 8.6%, EPS growth -0.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.8%
- 311.6% 10Y total return vs REGN's 99.1%
- Beta 0.28, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.67x
REGN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
- 29.6% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
- +26.3% vs TTRX's -43.1%
- 11.1% ROA vs TTRX's -45.0%
CRL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.6% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 15.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs TTRX's 1.45 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs REGN's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.3% vs TTRX's -43.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs TTRX's -45.0% |
TTRX vs ABBV vs REGN vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TTRX vs ABBV vs REGN vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories
CRL leads 1 • TTRX leads 0 • REGN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ABBV and REGN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.2B annually — 15.2x CRL's $4.0B. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, REGN holds the edge at +19.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | — | $61.2B | $14.9B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $24.5B | $4.2B | $824M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $4.2B | $4.4B | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $18.7B | $4.2B | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +70.2% | +84.5% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +26.7% | +24.3% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +6.9% | +29.6% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +30.6% | +27.9% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.0% | +19.0% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +57.4% | -7.2% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CRL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.4x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 80% valuation discount to ABBV's 87.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRL's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 18.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $119M | $367.8B | $75.2B | $8.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $114M | $431.6B | $74.8B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.30x | 87.74x | 17.44x | -57.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.62x | 15.65x | 15.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.76x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 15.29x | 18.14x | 12.05x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.01x | 5.24x | 2.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.67x | — | 2.51x | 2.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 20.64x | 18.42x | 15.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-142 for TTRX. TTRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CRL's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs TTRX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -141.7% | +62.1% | +14.3% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.0% | +3.1% | +11.1% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +23.9% | +8.9% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -156.2% | +21.5% | +10.2% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — | 0.09x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $63.8B | -$412M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $5.2B | $3.1B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $80,376 | $69.1B | $2.7B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.28x | 108.44x | 4.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABBV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $20,731 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,325 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, REGN leads with a +26.3% total return vs TTRX's -43.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABBV at 15.6% vs TTRX's -17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.1% | -7.8% | -6.7% | -16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.1% | +12.9% | +26.3% | +17.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | +54.3% | -2.2% | -11.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | +107.3% | +43.5% | -46.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.1% | +311.6% | +99.1% | +107.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.2% | +15.6% | -0.7% | -4.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABBV and REGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABBV is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTRX's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REGN currently trades 88.1% from its 52-week high vs TTRX's 15.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 0.28x | 0.77x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.50 | $244.81 | $821.11 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.57 | $176.57 | $476.49 | $132.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.0% | +84.9% | +88.1% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.1 | 44.6 | 43.1 | 45.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 5.7M | 631K | 780K |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTRX as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.4% upside for ABBV (target: $257) vs 19.7% for REGN (target: $866). For income investors, ABBV offers the higher dividend yield at 3.16% vs REGN's 0.47%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $256.69 | $865.68 | $206.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 41 | 48 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 13 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.57 | $3.41 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +5.3% | +4.4% |
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CRL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TTRX vs ABBV vs REGN vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTRX or ABBV or REGN or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger pick with 8. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 4x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Turn Therapeutics Inc. (TTRX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTRX or ABBV or REGN or CRL?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 4x versus AbbVie Inc. at 87. 7x. On forward P/E, AbbVie Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTRX or ABBV or REGN or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +107. 3%, compared to -46. 7% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +311. 6% versus TTRX's -43. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTRX or ABBV or REGN or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Turn Therapeutics Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning TTRX is approximately 426% more volatile than ABBV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Turn Therapeutics Inc. (TTRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 95% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTRX or ABBV or REGN or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is pulling ahead at 8. 6% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 8. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REGN leads at 5. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTRX or ABBV or REGN or CRL?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus 0. 0% for TTRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REGN leads at 85. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTRX or ABBV or REGN or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 6x for Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABBV: 23. 4% to $256. 69.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTRX or ABBV or REGN or CRL?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
2% yield), REGN (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. TTRX, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TTRX or ABBV or REGN or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 2% yield, +311. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +311. 6%, TTRX: -43. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTRX and ABBV and REGN and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TTRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV pays a dividend while TTRX, REGN, CRL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.