TTSH vs AMWD vs MHK vs MAS

For growth investors, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is the stronger pick with -0. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Masco Corporation (MAS) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the cheapest at 6.

1x versus Masco Corporation at 18. 6x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Woodmark Corporation wins at 2. 01x versus Masco Corporation's 3. 40x.

Over the past 5 years, Masco Corporation (MAS) delivered a total return of +16.

1%, compared to -62. 1% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAS returned +152. 1% versus TTSH's -77. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.

(TTSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus American Woodmark Corporation's 1. 49β — meaning AMWD is approximately 103% more volatile than TTSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) is pulling ahead at -0. 5% versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Masco Corporation grew EPS 2. 7% year-over-year, compared to -289. 0% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMWD leads at -2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Masco Corporation (MAS) is the more profitable company, earning 10.

7% net margin versus -1. 3% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAS leads at 16. 8% versus -1. 7% for TTSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTSH leads at 63. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 01x versus Masco Corporation's 3. 40x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Masco Corporation — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MHK: 26. 5% to $130. 00.

In this comparison, MAS (1.

7% yield) pays a dividend. TTSH, AMWD, MHK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Masco Corporation (MAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

28), 1. 7% yield, +152. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAS: +152. 1%, AMWD: -47. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (TTSH (Consumer Cyclical) and AMWD (Consumer Cyclical) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and MAS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TTSH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMWD is a small-cap deep-value stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MAS pays a dividend while TTSH, AMWD, MHK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.