TTSH
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
Home Improvement
Market Cap$112M
5Y Perf.+118.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TTSH vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.96T
5Y Perf.+125.1%
TTSH vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TTSH | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Home Improvement | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $112M | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $337M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 63.8% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $160M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $86.81B |
TTSH vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TTSH
AMZN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tile Shop Holdings,… (TTSH) | 100 | 218.8 | +118.8% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 225.1 | +125.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTSH vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AMZN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TTSH
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick
TTSH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.73
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 1.43x
- Beta 0.73, current ratio 1.43x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Growth Play
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs TTSH's -77.1%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs TTSH's -3.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AMZN | 12.4% revenue growth vs TTSH's -3.0% |
| Value | TTSH | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 35.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs TTSH's -1.3% |
| Stability / Safety | TTSH | Beta 0.73 vs AMZN's 1.51 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AMZN | +48.6% vs TTSH's -47.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs TTSH's -1.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -1.8% |
TTSH vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
TTSH vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGTTSH
TTSHTile Shop Holdings, I…
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TTSHMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AMZN5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
TTSH4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 2205.3x TTSH's $337M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTSH's -1.3%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $337M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.8% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.1% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | +74.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
TTSH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTSH's 25.7x.
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $112M | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $261M | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.00x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.73x | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.71x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.40x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 384.26x |
TTSH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TTSH. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTSH's 1.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs TTSH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.8% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.83x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $150M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $160M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -44.75x | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,468 for TTSH. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +48.6% total return vs TTSH's -47.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs TTSH's -14.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.3% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -47.4% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.9% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.3% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.1% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.7% | +37.5% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TTSH and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs TTSH's 38.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.25 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.75 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +38.6% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.3 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 45.6M |
Evenly matched — TTSH and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TTSH as "Hold" and AMZN as "Buy".
| Metric | TTSHTile Shop Holding… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +28.7% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TTSH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TTSH vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTSH or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 38. 3x trailing P/E (35. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTSH or AMZN?
On forward P/E, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTSH or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -45. 3% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus TTSH's -77. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTSH or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
(TTSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 106% more volatile than TTSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 183% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTSH or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -3. 0% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. (TTSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -289. 0% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTSH or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -1. 3% for Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -1. 7% for TTSH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTSH leads at 63. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTSH or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
(TTSH) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 22. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTSH or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TTSH or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
(TTSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73)). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTSH: -77. 1%, AMZN: +715. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTSH and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TTSH: -2.5% · AMZN: 16.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.