Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TTWO vs EA vs PLTK vs GLXG vs SKLZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Staffing & Employment Services
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
TTWO vs EA vs PLTK vs GLXG vs SKLZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Staffing & Employment Services | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia |
| Market Cap | $46.67B | $50.26B | $1.36B | $2M | $109M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.56B | $7.53B | $2.79B | $2M | $104M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.96B | $887M | $-295M | $237K | $-70M |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | 79.0% | 73.0% | 23.0% | 87.5% |
| Operating Margin | -59.3% | 15.4% | -3.0% | 11.8% | -68.3% |
| Forward P/E | 57.3x | 23.4x | 7.2x | 2.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $4.11B | $1.49B | $2.65B | $2M | $129M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.46B | $2.86B | $684M | $11M | $195M |
TTWO vs EA vs PLTK vs GLXG vs SKLZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO) | 100 | 145.4 | +45.4% |
| Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) | 100 | 140.0 | +40.0% |
| Playtika Holding Co… (PLTK) | 100 | 45.4 | -54.6% |
| Galaxy Payroll Grou… (GLXG) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) | 100 | 124.2 | +24.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTWO vs EA vs PLTK vs GLXG vs SKLZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTWO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -16.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 5.4% 10Y total return vs EA's 217.6%
EA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 22.0%, current ratio 1.05x
- 11.8% margin vs SKLZ's -67.4%
- Beta 0.18 vs SKLZ's 2.57, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, PLTK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GLXG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.50, yield 61.5%, current ratio 0.86x
- Better valuation composite
SKLZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 9.5% revenue growth vs GLXG's -4.3%
- +34.7% vs GLXG's -80.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs GLXG's -4.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.8% margin vs SKLZ's -67.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs SKLZ's 2.57, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GLXG's 61.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.7% vs GLXG's -80.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs TTWO's -39.6%, ROIC 14.7% vs -49.8% |
TTWO vs EA vs PLTK vs GLXG vs SKLZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TTWO vs EA vs PLTK vs GLXG vs SKLZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EA leads in 3 of 6 categories
TTWO leads 1 • PLTK leads 0 • GLXG leads 0 • SKLZ leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EA is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 3084.8x GLXG's $2M. EA is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKLZ's -67.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $7.5B | $2.8B | $2M | $104M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.7B | $1.2B | $217M | $318,759 | -$70M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4.0B | $887M | -$295M | $236,887 | -$70M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $488M | $2.3B | $561M | $370,649 | -$70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | +79.0% | +73.0% | +23.0% | +87.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -59.3% | +15.4% | -3.0% | +11.8% | -68.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -60.4% | +11.8% | -10.5% | +9.7% | -67.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +30.8% | +20.1% | +15.2% | -67.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.9% | +11.1% | +5.5% | +2.8% | +53.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.6% | +90.6% | -2.8% | -31.4% | -24.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PLTK and GLXG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.8x trailing earnings, GLXG trades at a 95% valuation discount to EA's 57.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GLXG's 0.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EA's 39.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46.7B | $50.3B | $1.4B | $2M | $109M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49.3B | $48.9B | $3.3B | $879,829 | $43M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.74x | 57.22x | -6.53x | 2.80x | -1.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.26x | 23.38x | 7.23x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.93x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 39.81x | 14.09x | 0.83x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.28x | 6.67x | 0.49x | 0.51x | 1.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.31x | 7.51x | — | 2.38x | 0.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 21.64x | 2.56x | 2.31x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EA delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-113 for TTWO. EA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTWO's 1.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EA scores 6/9 vs PLTK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -113.4% | +14.2% | — | +3.7% | -52.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -39.6% | +7.1% | -8.0% | +0.9% | -21.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.8% | +14.7% | +0.1% | — | -148.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -57.1% | +12.7% | +0.0% | +77.8% | -34.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.92x | 0.22x | — | 0.36x | 1.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.6B | -$1.4B | $2.0B | -$8M | -$66M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $2.9B | $684M | $11M | $195M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $1.5B | $2.6B | $2M | $129M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -69.94x | — | -0.99x | 49.35x | -7.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTWO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EA five years ago would be worth $14,364 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $222 for SKLZ. Over the past 12 months, SKLZ leads with a +34.7% total return vs GLXG's -80.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTWO at 21.2% vs GLXG's -70.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | -1.6% | -9.7% | -32.7% | +58.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.3% | +29.7% | -28.3% | -80.4% | +34.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.8% | +61.5% | -56.8% | -97.3% | -42.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.4% | +43.6% | -84.0% | -97.3% | -97.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +544.3% | +217.6% | -86.1% | -97.3% | -96.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.2% | +17.3% | -24.4% | -70.1% | -16.9% |
Risk & Volatility
EA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EA is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKLZ's 2.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EA currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs GLXG's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 0.18x | 1.29x | 0.50x | 2.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $264.79 | $204.89 | $5.52 | $7.81 | $20.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $187.63 | $141.19 | $2.64 | $0.95 | $2.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +98.0% | +65.1% | +15.2% | +34.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 35.1 | 58.2 | 24.7 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.8M | 1.7M | 18K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EA and GLXG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTWO as "Buy", EA as "Hold", PLTK as "Hold", SKLZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 931.5% upside for SKLZ (target: $72) vs -14.0% for EA (target: $173). For income investors, GLXG offers the higher dividend yield at 61.50% vs EA's 0.38%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $291.25 | $172.65 | $3.75 | — | $72.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 56 | 66 | 16 | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +11.1% | +61.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.75 | $0.40 | $5.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.1% | +1.5% | 0.0% | +8.5% |
EA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TTWO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TTWO vs EA vs PLTK vs GLXG vs SKLZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTWO or EA or PLTK or GLXG or SKLZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Skillz Inc.
(SKLZ) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG). Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) offers the better valuation at 2. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) a "Buy" — based on 56 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTWO or EA or PLTK or GLXG or SKLZ?
On trailing P/E, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the cheapest at 2.
8x versus Electronic Arts Inc. at 57. 2x. On forward P/E, Playtika Holding Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTWO or EA or PLTK or GLXG or SKLZ?
Over the past 5 years, Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) delivered a total return of +43. 6%, compared to -97. 8% for Skillz Inc. (SKLZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTWO returned +544. 3% versus GLXG's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTWO or EA or PLTK or GLXG or SKLZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Electronic Arts Inc.
(EA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 18β versus Skillz Inc. 's 2. 57β — meaning SKLZ is approximately 1290% more volatile than EA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Electronic Arts Inc. (EA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 192% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTWO or EA or PLTK or GLXG or SKLZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Skillz Inc.
(SKLZ) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -4. 3% for Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. grew EPS -16. 2% year-over-year, compared to -225. 0% for Playtika Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTWO leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTWO or EA or PLTK or GLXG or SKLZ?
Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
3% net margin versus -79. 5% for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLXG leads at 23. 3% versus -77. 9% for TTWO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKLZ leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTWO or EA or PLTK or GLXG or SKLZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Playtika Holding Corp.
(PLTK) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 57. 3x for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — 50. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKLZ: 931. 5% to $72. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTWO or EA or PLTK or GLXG or SKLZ?
In this comparison, GLXG (61.
5% yield), PLTK (11. 1% yield), EA (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. TTWO, SKLZ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TTWO or EA or PLTK or GLXG or SKLZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Galaxy Payroll Group Limited (GLXG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 61. 5% yield). Skillz Inc. (SKLZ) carries a higher beta of 2. 57 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLXG: -97. 3%, SKLZ: -96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTWO and EA and PLTK and GLXG and SKLZ?
These companies operate in different sectors (TTWO (Technology) and EA (Communication Services) and PLTK (Technology) and GLXG (Industrials) and SKLZ (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TTWO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PLTK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GLXG is a small-cap deep-value stock; SKLZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PLTK, GLXG pay a dividend while TTWO, EA, SKLZ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.