Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TTWO vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
Entertainment
Semiconductors
TTWO vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Electronic Gaming & Multimedia | Entertainment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $46.67B | $26M | $32.05B | $481M | $5.14T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.56B | $289M | $5.30B | $6.11B | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3.96B | $-228M | $-1.10B | $-153M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 55.3% | -14.1% | 78.5% | 12.7% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | -59.3% | -140.6% | -24.0% | -3.4% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 57.3x | — | — | 4.0x | 25.6x |
| Total Debt | $4.11B | $235M | $1.64B | $49M | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.46B | $59M | $1.21B | $1.19B | $10.61B |
TTWO vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA vs NVDA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Take-Two Interactiv… (TTWO) | 100 | 126.5 | +26.5% |
| The9 Limited (NCTY) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| Roblox Corporation (RBLX) | 100 | 69.1 | -30.9% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 16.4 | -83.6% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1584.2 | +1484.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TTWO vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TTWO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.63 vs NCTY's 2.56
NCTY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, RBLX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HUYA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 56.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 3.14x
- Beta 1.17, yield 56.7%, current ratio 3.14x
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 25.6x)
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs TTWO's 5.4%
- 65.5% revenue growth vs HUYA's -13.1%
- 55.6% margin vs NCTY's -78.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs HUYA's -13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 25.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs NCTY's -78.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs NCTY's 2.56 | |
| Dividends | 56.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.7% vs NCTY's -46.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs NCTY's -45.2%, ROIC 81.8% vs -37.2% |
TTWO vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TTWO vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
HUYA leads 1 • TTWO leads 0 • NCTY leads 0 • RBLX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 746.4x NCTY's $289M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCTY's -78.9%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $289M | $5.3B | $6.1B | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2.7B | -$407M | -$1.1B | -$120M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4.0B | -$228M | -$1.1B | -$153M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $488M | -$62M | $1.6B | $0 | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.3% | -14.1% | +78.5% | +12.7% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -59.3% | -140.6% | -24.0% | -3.4% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -60.4% | -78.9% | -20.7% | -2.5% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | -21.5% | +31.0% | -1.9% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.9% | -74.3% | +39.3% | +1.7% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.6% | -183.2% | -9.4% | -118.5% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
HUYA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46.7B | $26M | $32.0B | $481M | $5.14T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $49.3B | $52M | $32.5B | $314M | $5.14T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.74x | -0.76x | -29.07x | -103.70x | 43.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.26x | — | — | 3.97x | 25.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 38.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.28x | 1.72x | 6.55x | 0.54x | 23.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.31x | 1.20x | 82.33x | 0.67x | 32.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 23.69x | — | 53.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-3 for RBLX. HUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RBLX's 4.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUYA scores 7/9 vs NCTY's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -113.4% | -120.6% | -2.9% | -2.4% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -39.6% | -45.2% | -12.2% | -1.7% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -49.8% | -37.2% | -87.7% | -1.7% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -57.1% | -70.7% | -31.0% | -2.1% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.92x | 0.97x | 4.36x | 0.01x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.6B | $176M | $431M | -$1.1B | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $59M | $1.2B | $1.2B | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.1B | $235M | $1.6B | $49M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -69.94x | -9.65x | -27.89x | — | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $321 for NCTY. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +80.7% total return vs NCTY's -46.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs NCTY's -11.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | -9.1% | -44.7% | +5.6% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.3% | -46.7% | -36.4% | +26.9% | +80.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.8% | -31.0% | +23.4% | +99.7% | +625.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.4% | -96.8% | -34.1% | -60.8% | +1328.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +544.3% | -99.1% | -35.6% | -60.1% | +23902.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.2% | -11.6% | +7.3% | +25.9% | +93.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TTWO and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTWO is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NCTY's 2.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs RBLX's 29.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.63x | 2.56x | 1.57x | 1.17x | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $264.79 | $12.51 | $150.59 | $4.93 | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $187.63 | $5.00 | $41.75 | $2.21 | $112.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +45.2% | +29.7% | +64.9% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 54.9 | 29.0 | 54.2 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 31K | 9.1M | 1.0M | 164.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HUYA and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTWO as "Buy", NCTY as "Sell", RBLX as "Buy", HUYA as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.4% upside for RBLX (target: $89) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). HUYA is the only dividend payer here at 56.67% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Sell | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $291.25 | — | $88.81 | $3.45 | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 56 | 3 | 34 | 15 | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +56.7% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $12.34 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.6% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HUYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TTWO vs NCTY vs RBLX vs HUYA vs NVDA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TTWO or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for HUYA Inc. (HUYA). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (25. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) a "Buy" — based on 56 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TTWO or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA or NVDA?
On forward P/E, HUYA Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TTWO or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA or NVDA?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -96.
8% for The9 Limited (NCTY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus NCTY's -99. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TTWO or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA or NVDA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus The9 Limited's 2. 56β — meaning NCTY is approximately 304% more volatile than TTWO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HUYA Inc. (HUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Roblox Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TTWO or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -13. 1% for HUYA Inc. (HUYA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -225. 0% for The9 Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TTWO or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -373. 0% for The9 Limited — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -229. 6% for NCTY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBLX leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TTWO or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA or NVDA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 57. 3x for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. — 53. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RBLX: 98. 4% to $88. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — TTWO or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA or NVDA?
In this comparison, HUYA (56.
7% yield) pays a dividend. TTWO, NCTY, RBLX, NVDA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TTWO or NCTY or RBLX or HUYA or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
(TTWO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +544. 3% 10Y return). The9 Limited (NCTY) carries a higher beta of 2. 56 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTWO: +544. 3%, NCTY: -99. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TTWO and NCTY and RBLX and HUYA and NVDA?
These companies operate in different sectors (TTWO (Technology) and NCTY (Technology) and RBLX (Technology) and HUYA (Communication Services) and NVDA (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TTWO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RBLX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock. HUYA pays a dividend while TTWO, NCTY, RBLX, NVDA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.