Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TURB vs PSHG vs INSW vs SHLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Marine Shipping
Oil & Gas Midstream
Solar
TURB vs PSHG vs INSW vs SHLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Solar |
| Market Cap | $3M | $68M | $4.54B | $1.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $80M | $676M | $536M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $52M | $546M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 3.6% | 55.4% | 40.6% | 33.5% |
| Operating Margin | -42.2% | 63.7% | 44.4% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.6x | 7.8x | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $48M | $576M | $175M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $70M | $117M | $7M |
TURB vs PSHG vs INSW vs SHLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo Energy, S.A. … (TURB) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| Performance Shippin… (PSHG) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 203.6 | +103.6% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TURB vs PSHG vs INSW vs SHLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TURB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PSHG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (1.6x vs 21.5x)
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.41, yield 3.2%
- 10.3% 10Y total return vs SHLS's -71.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.41, Low D/E 28.5%, current ratio 3.71x
- Beta 0.41, yield 3.2%, current ratio 3.71x
SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 42.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 19.1% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.1% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 21.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs TURB's -35.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs SHLS's 2.23, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, vs PSHG's 2.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +162.3% vs TURB's -49.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs TURB's -23.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs -42.0% |
TURB vs PSHG vs INSW vs SHLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TURB vs PSHG vs INSW vs SHLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories
PSHG leads 2 • TURB leads 0 • SHLS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW is the larger business by revenue, generating $676M annually — 71.8x TURB's $9M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TURB's -35.4%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $80M | $676M | $536M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $64M | $465M | $73M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $52M | $546M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$35M | $122M | -$77M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +55.4% | +40.6% | +33.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.2% | +63.7% | +44.4% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | +65.4% | +80.8% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | -44.4% | +18.0% | -14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.2% | -19.0% | -91.3% | +74.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | -70.5% | +4.8% | — |
Valuation Metrics
PSHG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, PSHG trades at a 96% valuation discount to SHLS's 44.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSHG's 0.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHLS's 25.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $68M | $4.5B | $1.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $45M | $5.0B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.76x | 1.62x | 14.71x | 44.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 7.81x | 21.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 0.80x | 10.63x | 25.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.27x | 0.78x | 5.38x | 3.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 0.25x | 2.25x | 2.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.43x | 118.95x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSHG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-85 for TURB. PSHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TURB's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs TURB's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.7% | +16.5% | +27.1% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.9% | +9.4% | +20.1% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.0% | +13.3% | +9.4% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -89.9% | +14.0% | +12.1% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | 0.17x | 0.29x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$23M | $459M | $168M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $70M | $117M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $48M | $576M | $175M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.39x | 19.08x | 0.90x | 5.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSW five years ago would be worth $54,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $268 for PSHG. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +162.3% total return vs TURB's -49.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 41.5% vs TURB's -35.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.3% | -21.0% | +99.6% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.6% | +10.2% | +162.3% | +83.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | +130.7% | +183.5% | -55.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | -97.3% | +450.0% | -70.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.5% | -99.8% | +1029.1% | -71.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.7% | +32.1% | +41.5% | -23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TURB and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TURB is the less volatile stock with a -1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHLS's 2.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs TURB's 6.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.42x | 0.72x | 0.41x | 2.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.45 | $2.58 | $92.66 | $11.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $1.40 | $35.60 | $3.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.5% | +67.1% | +98.9% | +77.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 42.7 | 73.0 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 142K | 594K | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — INSW and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INSW as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -1.0% upside for SHLS (target: $9) vs -5.4% for INSW (target: $87). For income investors, INSW offers the higher dividend yield at 3.18% vs PSHG's 2.70%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $86.67 | $8.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 13 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.05 | $2.92 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PSHG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
TURB vs PSHG vs INSW vs SHLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TURB or PSHG or INSW or SHLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TURB or PSHG or INSW or SHLS?
On trailing P/E, Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the cheapest at 1. 6x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 44. 2x. On forward P/E, International Seaways, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TURB or PSHG or INSW or SHLS?
Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) delivered a total return of +450. 0%, compared to -97. 3% for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1029% versus PSHG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TURB or PSHG or INSW or SHLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 42β versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning SHLS is approximately -257% more volatile than TURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 2% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TURB or PSHG or INSW or SHLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. grew EPS 42. 9% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSHG leads at 33. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TURB or PSHG or INSW or SHLS?
Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 0% net margin versus -35. 4% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSHG leads at 47. 8% versus -42. 2% for TURB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSHG leads at 57. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TURB or PSHG or INSW or SHLS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHLS: -1. 0% to $8. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — TURB or PSHG or INSW or SHLS?
In this comparison, INSW (3.
2% yield), PSHG (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. TURB, SHLS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TURB or PSHG or INSW or SHLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 42)). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a higher beta of 2. 23 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TURB: -73. 5%, SHLS: -71. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TURB and PSHG and INSW and SHLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (TURB (Energy) and PSHG (Industrials) and INSW (Energy) and SHLS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TURB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSHG is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock. PSHG, INSW pay a dividend while TURB, SHLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.