Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TURB
Turbo Energy, S.A. American Depositary Shares

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3M
5Y Perf.-45.0%
SPWR
SunPower Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$866M
5Y Perf.-47.1%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.06B
5Y Perf.+36.1%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-51.6%

TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TURB logoTURB
SPWR logoSPWR
FSLR logoFSLR
SHLS logoSHLS
IndustrySolarSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$3M$866M$23.06B$1.32B
Revenue (TTM)$9M$315M$5.42B$536M
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$-42M$1.67B$34M
Gross Margin3.6%50.4%41.7%33.5%
Operating Margin-42.2%-2.7%33.0%11.2%
Forward P/E5.5x12.4x19.4x
Total Debt$5M$188M$499M$175M
Cash & Equiv.$2M$10M$2.80B$7M

TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TURB
SPWR
FSLR
SHLS
StockSep 23May 26Return
Turbo Energy, S.A. … (TURB)10055.0-45.0%
SunPower Inc. (SPWR)10052.9-47.1%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100136.1+36.1%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)10048.4-51.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. SunPower Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. SHLS also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TURB
Turbo Energy, S.A. American Depositary Shares
The Lower-Volatility Pick

TURB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
SPWR
SunPower Inc.
The Value Play

SPWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (5.5x vs 19.4x)
Best for: value
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Growth Play

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
  • 324.1% 10Y total return vs TURB's -70.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
  • +66.5% vs TURB's -43.3%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFSLR logoFSLR24.1% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1%
ValueSPWR logoSPWRLower P/E (5.5x vs 19.4x)
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs TURB's -35.4%
Stability / SafetyFSLR logoFSLRBeta 1.39 vs SPWR's 2.13
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SHLS logoSHLS+66.5% vs TURB's -43.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs TURB's -23.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -42.0%

TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TURBTurbo Energy, S.A. American Depositary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

SPWRSunPower Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Subsegments
100.0%$109M
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B
SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M

TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSLRLAGGINGSPWR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 575.5x TURB's $9M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TURB's -35.4%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$9M$315M$5.4B$536M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$6M$2.2B$73M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$42M$1.7B$34M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$15M$1.7B-$77M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+3.6%+50.4%+41.7%+33.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-42.2%-2.7%+33.0%+11.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-35.4%-13.2%+30.7%+6.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.7%-4.6%+30.8%-14.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-63.2%-0.2%+23.6%+74.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.6%-101.3%+65.1%
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — TURB and SPWR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 61% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHLS's 22.8x.

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
Market CapShares × price$3M$866M$23.1B$1.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$7M$1.0B$20.8B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.85x-15.25x15.10x39.20x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.45x12.39x19.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.38x22.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.30x2.80x4.42x2.77x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.06x2.42x2.20x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.42x
Evenly matched — TURB and SPWR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-85 for TURB. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TURB's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs TURB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-84.7%+18.0%+5.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-23.9%-19.5%+12.6%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-42.0%-5.3%+17.6%+5.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-89.9%-7.2%+15.9%+7.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92575
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.01x0.05x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3M$179M-$2.3B$168M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$10M$2.8B$7M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$188M$499M$175M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-10.39x-1.57x53.51x5.91x
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, SHLS leads with a +66.5% total return vs TURB's -43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs SPWR's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+49.3%-38.2%-21.8%-13.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-43.3%-42.4%+65.3%+66.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-70.3%-81.3%+20.9%-60.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-70.3%-81.3%+187.6%-72.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-70.3%-81.3%+324.1%-74.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-33.3%-42.8%+6.5%-26.5%
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TURB and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TURB is the less volatile stock with a -1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWR's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs TURB's 7.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-1.42x2.15x1.36x2.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.45$2.27$285.99$11.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.57$0.81$125.80$3.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+7.3%+44.9%+75.0%+69.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.045.964.363.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.2M1.7M2.1M5.1M
Evenly matched — TURB and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SPWR as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 17.4% for FSLR (target: $252).

MetricTURB logoTURBTurbo Energy, S.A…SPWR logoSPWRSunPower Inc.FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.81$251.82$9.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts457323
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises013
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.1%+0.0%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHLS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallFirst Solar, Inc. (FSLR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?

On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?

Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -81. 3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +334. 7% versus SPWR's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turbo Energy, S.

A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 42β versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning SHLS is approximately -257% more volatile than TURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. grew EPS 42. 9% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -35. 4% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -42. 2% for TURB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.

(SPWR) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Turbo Energy, S.

A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 42)). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TURB: -73. 5%, SPWR: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TURB and SPWR and FSLR and SHLS?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TURB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TURB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SPWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TURB and SPWR and FSLR and SHLS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TURB: -63.2% · SPWR: -0.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.