Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Solar
TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $3M | $866M | $23.06B | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $315M | $5.42B | $536M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-42M | $1.67B | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 3.6% | 50.4% | 41.7% | 33.5% |
| Operating Margin | -42.2% | -2.7% | 33.0% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.5x | 12.4x | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $188M | $499M | $175M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $10M | $2.80B | $7M |
TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Turbo Energy, S.A. … (TURB) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 52.9 | -47.1% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TURB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SPWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 19.4x)
FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 18.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.8%
- 324.1% 10Y total return vs TURB's -70.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
- +66.5% vs TURB's -43.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.1% revenue growth vs TURB's -28.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 19.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs TURB's -35.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.39 vs SPWR's 2.13 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.5% vs TURB's -43.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs TURB's -23.9%, ROIC 17.6% vs -42.0% |
TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories
SHLS leads 1 • TURB leads 0 • SPWR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 575.5x TURB's $9M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TURB's -35.4%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $315M | $5.4B | $536M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$6M | $2.2B | $73M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$42M | $1.7B | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$15M | $1.7B | -$77M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +50.4% | +41.7% | +33.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.2% | -2.7% | +33.0% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | -13.2% | +30.7% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | -4.6% | +30.8% | -14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.2% | -0.2% | +23.6% | +74.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | -101.3% | +65.1% | — |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TURB and SPWR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, FSLR trades at a 61% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHLS's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $866M | $23.1B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $1.0B | $20.8B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.85x | -15.25x | 15.10x | 39.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.45x | 12.39x | 19.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.49x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.38x | 22.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.30x | 2.80x | 4.42x | 2.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.06x | — | 2.42x | 2.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.42x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-85 for TURB. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TURB's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs TURB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -84.7% | — | +18.0% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -23.9% | -19.5% | +12.6% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.0% | -5.3% | +17.6% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -89.9% | -7.2% | +15.9% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.01x | — | 0.05x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $179M | -$2.3B | $168M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $10M | $2.8B | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $188M | $499M | $175M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.39x | -1.57x | 53.51x | 5.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, SHLS leads with a +66.5% total return vs TURB's -43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs SPWR's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +49.3% | -38.2% | -21.8% | -13.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -43.3% | -42.4% | +65.3% | +66.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | -81.3% | +20.9% | -60.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | -81.3% | +187.6% | -72.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | -81.3% | +324.1% | -74.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.3% | -42.8% | +6.5% | -26.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TURB and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TURB is the less volatile stock with a -1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWR's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs TURB's 7.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.42x | 2.15x | 1.36x | 2.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.45 | $2.27 | $285.99 | $11.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $0.81 | $125.80 | $3.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.3% | +44.9% | +75.0% | +69.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.0 | 45.9 | 64.3 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.2M | 1.7M | 2.1M | 5.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPWR as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 17.4% for FSLR (target: $252).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.81 | $251.82 | $9.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 | 73 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.0% |
FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHLS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
TURB vs SPWR vs FSLR vs SHLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the stronger pick with 24. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?
On trailing P/E, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the cheapest at 15. 1x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -81. 3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +334. 7% versus SPWR's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the lower-risk stock at -1. 42β versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. 's 2. 23β — meaning SHLS is approximately -257% more volatile than TURB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 2% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is pulling ahead at 24. 1% versus -28. 1% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares (TURB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. grew EPS 42. 9% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -35. 4% for Turbo Energy, S. A. American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -42. 2% for TURB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 14. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TURB or SPWR or FSLR or SHLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Turbo Energy, S.
A. American Depositary Shares (TURB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1. 42)). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TURB: -73. 5%, SPWR: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TURB and SPWR and FSLR and SHLS?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TURB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.