Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TUSK vs WTTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
TUSK vs WTTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $113M | $1.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $103M | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-64M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 2.7% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -27.9% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | 23.5x | 41.7x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $374M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $102M | $18M |
TUSK vs WTTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mammoth Energy Serv… (TUSK) | 100 | 186.5 | +86.5% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 283.2 | +183.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TUSK vs WTTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TUSK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.66
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 2.53x
- Beta 0.66, current ratio 2.53x
WTTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -33.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
- 26.6% 10Y total return vs TUSK's -78.5%
- -3.1% revenue growth vs TUSK's -76.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% revenue growth vs TUSK's -76.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (23.5x vs 41.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs TUSK's -61.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs WTTR's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.2% vs TUSK's -6.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs TUSK's -18.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -25.9% |
TUSK vs WTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TUSK vs WTTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WTTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 13.6x TUSK's $103M. WTTR is the more profitable business, keeping 1.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TUSK's -61.8%. On growth, WTTR holds the edge at -2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $103M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$15M | $217M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$64M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$54M | -$95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.9% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -61.8% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -52.1% | -6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -82.2% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +156.3% | -4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TUSK leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.5x trailing earnings, TUSK trades at a 72% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.1x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $113M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.50x | 84.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.56x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
WTTR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WTTR delivers a 2.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-25 for TUSK. TUSK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WTTR's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TUSK scores 5/9 vs WTTR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -25.0% | +2.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -25.9% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.9% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$99M | $356M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $102M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $374M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -82.84x | 1.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTTR five years ago would be worth $25,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,456 for TUSK. Over the past 12 months, WTTR leads with a +134.2% total return vs TUSK's -6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTTR at 33.1% vs TUSK's -14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.3% | +52.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.4% | +134.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.7% | +135.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.4% | +158.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.5% | +26.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.1% | +33.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TUSK and WTTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TUSK is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTTR's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTTR currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs TUSK's 75.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.12 | $17.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.72 | $7.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.3% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 296K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TUSK as "Hold" and WTTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 197.9% upside for TUSK (target: $7) vs -4.9% for WTTR (target: $16). WTTR is the only dividend payer here at 1.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% |
WTTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TUSK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
TUSK vs WTTR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TUSK or WTTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the stronger pick with -3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -76. 4% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TUSK or WTTR?
On trailing P/E, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
(TUSK) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TUSK or WTTR?
Over the past 5 years, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) delivered a total return of +158. 4%, compared to -35. 4% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTTR returned +26. 6% versus TUSK's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TUSK or WTTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
(TUSK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning WTTR is approximately 65% more volatile than TUSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 40% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TUSK or WTTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is pulling ahead at -3. 1% versus -76. 4% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. grew EPS 102. 3% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WTTR leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TUSK or WTTR?
Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -143. 9% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTTR leads at 2. 5% versus -143. 9% for TUSK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TUSK leads at 45. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TUSK or WTTR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TUSK: 197.
9% to $7. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TUSK or WTTR?
In this comparison, WTTR (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. TUSK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TUSK or WTTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTTR: +26. 6%, TUSK: -78. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TUSK and WTTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (TUSK (Industrials) and WTTR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WTTR pays a dividend while TUSK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.