Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TUSK vs WTTR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

Conglomerates

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$113M
5Y Perf.+86.5%
WTTR
Select Water Solutions, Inc.

Regulated Water

UtilitiesNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.89B
5Y Perf.+183.2%

TUSK vs WTTR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TUSK logoTUSK
WTTR logoWTTR
IndustryConglomeratesRegulated Water
Market Cap$113M$1.89B
Revenue (TTM)$103M$1.40B
Net Income (TTM)$-64M$22M
Gross Margin2.7%18.2%
Operating Margin-27.9%2.3%
Forward P/E23.5x41.7x
Total Debt$3M$374M
Cash & Equiv.$102M$18M

TUSK vs WTTRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TUSK
WTTR
StockMay 20May 26Return
Mammoth Energy Serv… (TUSK)100186.5+86.5%
Select Water Soluti… (WTTR)100283.2+183.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TUSK vs WTTR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WTTR leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

TUSK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.66
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 2.53x
  • Beta 0.66, current ratio 2.53x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
WTTR
Select Water Solutions, Inc.
The Growth Play

WTTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -33.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
  • 26.6% 10Y total return vs TUSK's -78.5%
  • -3.1% revenue growth vs TUSK's -76.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWTTR logoWTTR-3.1% revenue growth vs TUSK's -76.4%
ValueTUSK logoTUSKLower P/E (23.5x vs 41.7x)
Quality / MarginsWTTR logoWTTR1.5% margin vs TUSK's -61.8%
Stability / SafetyTUSK logoTUSKBeta 0.66 vs WTTR's 1.09, lower leverage
DividendsWTTR logoWTTR1.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)WTTR logoWTTR+134.2% vs TUSK's -6.4%
Efficiency (ROA)WTTR logoWTTR1.3% ROA vs TUSK's -18.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -25.9%

TUSK vs WTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TUSKMammoth Energy Services, Inc.
FY 2024
Product
100.0%$19M
WTTRSelect Water Solutions, Inc.
FY 2025
Water Services
71.6%$796M
Water Infrastructure
28.4%$316M

TUSK vs WTTR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWTTRLAGGINGTUSK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WTTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

WTTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 13.6x TUSK's $103M. WTTR is the more profitable business, keeping 1.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TUSK's -61.8%. On growth, WTTR holds the edge at -2.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$103M$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$15M$217M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$64M$22M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$54M-$95M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+2.7%+18.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-27.9%+2.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-61.8%+1.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-52.1%-6.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-82.2%-2.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+156.3%-4.4%
WTTR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TUSK leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

At 23.5x trailing earnings, TUSK trades at a 72% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.1x P/E.

MetricTUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
Market CapShares × price$113M$1.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$15M$2.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS23.50x84.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.41.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.56x1.34x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.44x1.88x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
TUSK leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WTTR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

WTTR delivers a 2.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-25 for TUSK. TUSK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WTTR's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TUSK scores 5/9 vs WTTR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-25.0%+2.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-18.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-25.9%+2.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-23.9%+2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.40x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$99M$356M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$102M$18M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$374M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-82.84x1.54x
WTTR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WTTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WTTR five years ago would be worth $25,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,456 for TUSK. Over the past 12 months, WTTR leads with a +134.2% total return vs TUSK's -6.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTTR at 33.1% vs TUSK's -14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.3%+52.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.4%+134.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-36.7%+135.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-35.4%+158.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.5%+26.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-14.1%+33.1%
WTTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TUSK and WTTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TUSK is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTTR's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTTR currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs TUSK's 75.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.66x1.09x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.12$17.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.72$7.20
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.3%+93.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.169.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded296K1.7M
Evenly matched — TUSK and WTTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates TUSK as "Hold" and WTTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 197.9% upside for TUSK (target: $7) vs -4.9% for WTTR (target: $16). WTTR is the only dividend payer here at 1.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTUSK logoTUSKMammoth Energy Se…WTTR logoWTTRSelect Water Solu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$7.00$16.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1314
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises33
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

WTTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TUSK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallSelect Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TUSK vs WTTR: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TUSK or WTTR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) is the stronger pick with -3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -76. 4% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TUSK or WTTR?

On trailing P/E, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

(TUSK) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TUSK or WTTR?

Over the past 5 years, Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) delivered a total return of +158. 4%, compared to -35. 4% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTTR returned +26. 6% versus TUSK's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TUSK or WTTR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.

(TUSK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning WTTR is approximately 65% more volatile than TUSK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 40% for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TUSK or WTTR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) is pulling ahead at -3. 1% versus -76. 4% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. grew EPS 102. 3% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Select Water Solutions, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WTTR leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TUSK or WTTR?

Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 5% net margin versus -143. 9% for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTTR leads at 2. 5% versus -143. 9% for TUSK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TUSK leads at 45. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TUSK or WTTR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TUSK: 197.

9% to $7. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TUSK or WTTR?

In this comparison, WTTR (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. TUSK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TUSK or WTTR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.

(WTTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTTR: +26. 6%, TUSK: -78. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TUSK and WTTR?

These companies operate in different sectors (TUSK (Industrials) and WTTR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

WTTR pays a dividend while TUSK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TUSK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WTTR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TUSK and WTTR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TUSK: -82.2% · WTTR: -2.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TUSK: 23.5x · WTTR: 84.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.