Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TVGN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ADMA vs HALO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TVGN
Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.48B
5Y Perf.-98.5%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1690.08T
5Y Perf.+29.0%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.88B
5Y Perf.+314.0%
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.89B
5Y Perf.+463.4%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.55B
5Y Perf.+85.3%

TVGN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ADMA vs HALO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TVGN logoTVGN
DBVT logoDBVT
IMVT logoIMVT
ADMA logoADMA
HALO logoHALO
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$1.48B$1690.08T$5.88B$1.89B$7.55B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$0.00$510M$1.40B
Net Income (TTM)$-31M$-168M$-464M$165M$317M
Gross Margin61.3%81.9%
Operating Margin42.1%58.4%
Forward P/E9.7x8.0x
Total Debt$3M$22M$98K$80M$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$1M$194M$714M$88M$134M

TVGN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ADMA vs HALOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TVGN
DBVT
IMVT
ADMA
HALO
StockJan 22May 26Return
Tevogen Bio Holding… (TVGN)1001.5-98.5%
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)100129.0+29.0%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100414.0+314.0%
ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA)100563.4+463.4%
Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO)100185.3+85.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TVGN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ADMA vs HALO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HALO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. ADMA Biologics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. IMVT also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TVGN
Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

TVGN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, DBVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.36, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
  • +102.4% vs TVGN's -86.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
The Income Pick

ADMA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.25
  • 32.4% margin vs TVGN's -5.3%
  • 27.4% ROA vs TVGN's -6.9%
Best for: income & stability
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
The Growth Play

HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 37.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.4%
  • 5.6% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 190.9%
  • Beta 0.51, current ratio 4.66x
  • 37.6% revenue growth vs TVGN's -6.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHALO logoHALO37.6% revenue growth vs TVGN's -6.7%
ValueHALO logoHALOLower P/E (8.0x vs 9.7x)
Quality / MarginsADMA logoADMA32.4% margin vs TVGN's -5.3%
Stability / SafetyHALO logoHALOBeta 0.51 vs TVGN's 1.95
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)IMVT logoIMVT+102.4% vs TVGN's -86.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ADMA logoADMA27.4% ROA vs TVGN's -6.9%

TVGN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ADMA vs HALO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TVGNTevogen Bio Holdings Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ADMAADMA Biologics, Inc.
FY 2024
ADMA BioManufacturing Segment
97.4%$416M
Plasma Collection Centers Segment
2.6%$11M
HALOHalozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
53.6%$868M
Product
23.3%$376M
Collaborative Agreements
9.4%$152M
Bulk rHuPH20
8.2%$133M
Sales-based milestone
4.3%$70M
Upfront Fees
1.1%$18M

TVGN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ADMA vs HALO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLADMALAGGINGIMVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

HALO and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ADMA is the more profitable business, keeping 32.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HALO's 22.7%. On growth, HALO holds the edge at +51.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTVGN logoTVGNTevogen Bio Holdi…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$0$510M$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$30M-$112M-$487M$221M$945M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$31M-$168M-$464M$165M$317M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$13M-$151M-$423M$108M$645M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+61.3%+81.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+42.1%+58.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+32.4%+22.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.2%+46.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.3%+51.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.5%+91.5%+19.7%+72.7%-2.1%
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 13.6x trailing earnings, ADMA trades at a 46% valuation discount to HALO's 25.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ADMA's 9.5x.

MetricTVGN logoTVGNTevogen Bio Holdi…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
Market CapShares × price$1.5B$1690.08T$5.9B$1.9B$7.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$1690.08T$5.2B$1.9B$7.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-79.91x-0.75x-10.60x13.62x25.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.69x7.96x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.09x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.45x8.20x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.71x5.41x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.65x6.20x4.19x162.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF68.06x11.72x
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ADMA and HALO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADMA's 0.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADMA scores 5/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTVGN logoTVGNTevogen Bio Holdi…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-130.2%-47.1%+39.0%+6.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.9%-89.0%-44.1%+27.4%+12.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+36.0%+73.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-145.7%-66.1%+38.8%+38.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944255
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x0.00x0.17x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M-$172M-$714M-$8M-$134M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$194M$714M$88M$134M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$22M$98,000$80M$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-219.56x-189.82x50.85x46.08x
Evenly matched — ADMA and HALO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ADMA five years ago would be worth $48,922 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $151 for TVGN. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +102.4% total return vs TVGN's -86.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADMA at 32.7% vs TVGN's -76.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTVGN logoTVGNTevogen Bio Holdi…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-58.9%+3.6%+11.7%-54.3%-8.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-86.3%+100.5%+102.4%-61.5%-5.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.6%+18.1%+49.8%+133.4%+111.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.5%-68.3%+84.4%+389.2%+39.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.5%-87.1%+190.9%+34.8%+559.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-76.0%+5.7%+14.4%+32.7%+28.4%
ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMVT and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TVGN's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs TVGN's 9.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTVGN logoTVGNTevogen Bio Holdi…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.95x1.26x1.36x1.25x0.51x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$75.50$26.18$30.09$22.73$82.22
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.35$7.53$13.36$7.21$47.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+9.9%+75.3%+96.2%+35.9%+78.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.547.450.626.047.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded34K252K1.4M7.4M1.4M
Evenly matched — IMVT and HALO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ADMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TVGN as "Hold", DBVT as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ADMA as "Buy", HALO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 157.0% upside for ADMA (target: $21) vs 17.9% for HALO (target: $76).

MetricTVGN logoTVGNTevogen Bio Holdi…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ADMA logoADMAADMA Biologics, I…HALO logoHALOHalozyme Therapeu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.33$45.50$21.00$75.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts115231027
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+1.7%+4.5%
ADMA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

HALO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ADMA leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TVGN vs DBVT vs IMVT vs ADMA vs HALO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TVGN or DBVT or IMVT or ADMA or HALO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger pick with 37. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 19. 6% for ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TVGN or DBVT or IMVT or ADMA or HALO?

On trailing P/E, ADMA Biologics, Inc.

(ADMA) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. at 25. 0x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TVGN or DBVT or IMVT or ADMA or HALO?

Over the past 5 years, ADMA Biologics, Inc.

(ADMA) delivered a total return of +389. 2%, compared to -98. 5% for Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc. (TVGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +559. 7% versus TVGN's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TVGN or DBVT or IMVT or ADMA or HALO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning TVGN is approximately 281% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 17% for ADMA Biologics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TVGN or DBVT or IMVT or ADMA or HALO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is pulling ahead at 37. 6% versus 19. 6% for ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS -25. 4% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ADMA leads at 49. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TVGN or DBVT or IMVT or ADMA or HALO?

ADMA Biologics, Inc.

(ADMA) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Immunovant, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus 0. 0% for IMVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HALO leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TVGN or DBVT or IMVT or ADMA or HALO more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 9. 7x for ADMA Biologics, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADMA: 157. 0% to $21. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TVGN or DBVT or IMVT or ADMA or HALO?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is TVGN or DBVT or IMVT or ADMA or HALO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.

(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), +559. 7% 10Y return). Tevogen Bio Holdings Inc. (TVGN) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +559. 7%, TVGN: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TVGN and DBVT and IMVT and ADMA and HALO?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TVGN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TVGN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ADMA

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HALO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 25%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.