Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TWIN vs WDFC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$261M
5Y Perf.+229.5%
WDFC
WD-40 Company

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.21B
5Y Perf.+9.9%

TWIN vs WDFC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TWIN logoTWIN
WDFC logoWDFC
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$261M$4.21B
Revenue (TTM)$348M$621M
Net Income (TTM)$22M$90M
Gross Margin27.9%55.4%
Operating Margin3.3%16.4%
Forward P/E24.8x35.2x
Total Debt$49M$98M
Cash & Equiv.$16M$58M

TWIN vs WDFCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TWIN
WDFC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN)100329.5+229.5%
WD-40 Company (WDFC)100109.9+9.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TWIN vs WDFC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: WDFC leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Twin Disc, Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated
The Growth Play

TWIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth -117.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.9%
  • 15.5% revenue growth vs WDFC's 5.0%
  • Lower P/E (24.8x vs 35.2x)
Best for: growth exposure
WDFC
WD-40 Company
The Income Pick

WDFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 1.8%
  • 125.4% 10Y total return vs TWIN's 76.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 2.79x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTWIN logoTWIN15.5% revenue growth vs WDFC's 5.0%
ValueTWIN logoTWINLower P/E (24.8x vs 35.2x)
Quality / MarginsWDFC logoWDFC14.4% margin vs TWIN's 6.3%
Stability / SafetyWDFC logoWDFCBeta 0.18 vs TWIN's 1.04
DividendsWDFC logoWDFC1.8% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs TWIN's 0.9%
Momentum (1Y)TWIN logoTWIN+167.6% vs WDFC's -8.1%
Efficiency (ROA)WDFC logoWDFC19.5% ROA vs TWIN's 6.1%, ROIC 26.2% vs 3.9%

TWIN vs WDFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TWINTwin Disc, Incorporated
FY 2025
Marine and Propulsion Systems
59.0%$201M
Land Based Transmissions
23.5%$80M
Industrial
12.2%$42M
Other
5.3%$18M
WDFCWD-40 Company
FY 2025
WD-40 Multi-Use Product
77.1%$478M
WD-40 Specialist
13.2%$82M
Other Maintenance Products
5.0%$31M
Homecare And Cleaning Products
4.7%$29M

TWIN vs WDFC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWDFCLAGGINGTWIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WDFC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

WDFC is the larger business by revenue, generating $621M annually — 1.8x TWIN's $348M. WDFC is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWIN's 6.3%.

MetricTWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…WDFC logoWDFCWD-40 Company
RevenueTrailing 12 months$348M$621M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$27M$111M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$22M$90M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$70,000$78M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.9%+55.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.3%+16.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.3%+14.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.0%+12.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.3%+0.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.7%-7.9%
WDFC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TWIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, TWIN's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WDFC's 38.0x.

MetricTWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…WDFC logoWDFCWD-40 Company
Market CapShares × price$261M$4.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$294M$4.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-129.21x31.52x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.78x35.21x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.61x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.86x37.96x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.77x6.79x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.52x10.67x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.57x50.50x
TWIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WDFC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

WDFC delivers a 33.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $13 for TWIN. TWIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WDFC's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WDFC scores 7/9 vs TWIN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…WDFC logoWDFCWD-40 Company
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.2%+33.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.1%+19.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.9%+26.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.5%+28.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x0.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$33M$40M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$16M$58M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$49M$98M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.82x32.08x
WDFC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TWIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TWIN five years ago would be worth $15,008 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,477 for WDFC. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +167.6% total return vs WDFC's -8.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWIN at 15.2% vs WDFC's 6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…WDFC logoWDFCWD-40 Company
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.9%+8.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+167.6%-8.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.7%+20.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.1%-5.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+76.6%+125.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.2%+6.3%
TWIN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TWIN and WDFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

WDFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWIN's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWIN currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs WDFC's 83.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…WDFC logoWDFCWD-40 Company
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.04x0.18x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.63$253.24
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.69$175.38
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.2%+83.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.644.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded48K176K
Evenly matched — TWIN and WDFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WDFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates TWIN as "Hold" and WDFC as "Hold". For income investors, WDFC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.76% vs TWIN's 0.91%.

MetricTWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…WDFC logoWDFCWD-40 Company
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$300.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts47
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises322
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.16$3.70
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%+0.3%
WDFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WDFC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TWIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallWD-40 Company (WDFC)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TWIN vs WDFC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TWIN or WDFC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is the stronger pick with 15.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for WD-40 Company (WDFC). WD-40 Company (WDFC) offers the better valuation at 31. 5x trailing P/E (35. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TWIN or WDFC?

On forward P/E, Twin Disc, Incorporated is actually cheaper at 24.

8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TWIN or WDFC?

Over the past 5 years, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) delivered a total return of +50.

1%, compared to -5. 2% for WD-40 Company (WDFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WDFC returned +125. 4% versus TWIN's +76. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TWIN or WDFC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WD-40 Company (WDFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

18β versus Twin Disc, Incorporated's 1. 04β — meaning TWIN is approximately 478% more volatile than WDFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 36% for WD-40 Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TWIN or WDFC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) is pulling ahead at 15.

5% versus 5. 0% for WD-40 Company (WDFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WD-40 Company grew EPS 30. 9% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWIN leads at 11. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TWIN or WDFC?

WD-40 Company (WDFC) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

7% net margin versus -0. 6% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WDFC leads at 16. 7% versus 2. 9% for TWIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WDFC leads at 55. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TWIN or WDFC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN) trades at 24.

8x forward P/E versus 35. 2x for WD-40 Company — 10. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TWIN or WDFC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

WD-40 Company (WDFC) offers the highest yield at 1. 8%, versus 0. 9% for Twin Disc, Incorporated (TWIN).

09

Is TWIN or WDFC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, WD-40 Company (WDFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

18), 1. 8% yield, +125. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WDFC: +125. 4%, TWIN: +76. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TWIN and WDFC?

These companies operate in different sectors (TWIN (Industrials) and WDFC (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; WDFC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TWIN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WDFC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TWIN and WDFC on the metrics below

Net Margin>
%
(TWIN: 6.3% · WDFC: 14.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.