REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TWO vs WELL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
TWO vs WELL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $1.29B | $151.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $765M | $11.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-343M | $1.43B |
| Gross Margin | 88.0% | 39.1% |
| Operating Margin | 57.3% | 4.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 79.7x |
| Total Debt | $8.56B | $21.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $842M | $5.03B |
TWO vs WELL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two Harbors Investm… (TWO) | 100 | 67.8 | -32.2% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 427.2 | +327.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TWO vs WELL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TWO is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 79.7x)
- 13.4% yield, vs WELL's 1.3%
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.13, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 233.9% 10Y total return vs TWO's -5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs TWO's -28.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 79.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs TWO's -44.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs TWO's 0.49, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 13.4% yield, vs WELL's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.8% vs TWO's +18.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.3% ROA vs TWO's -3.0%, ROIC 0.5% vs 3.1% |
TWO vs WELL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TWO vs WELL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TWO and WELL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 15.2x TWO's $765M. WELL is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWO's -44.8%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $765M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $2.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$343M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$66M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +88.0% | +39.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +57.3% | +4.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -44.8% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +40.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +120.2% | +22.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TWO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, WELL's 67.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWO's 197.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $151.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $168.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.81x | 155.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.85x | 79.69x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 197.77x | 67.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.12x | 14.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 3.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.47x | 53.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WELL delivers a 3.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TWO. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TWO's 4.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs TWO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.1% | +3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.9% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.79x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.7B | $16.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $842M | $5.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.6B | $21.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.09x | 0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,193 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,214 for TWO. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +45.8% total return vs TWO's +18.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 43.3% vs TWO's 13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.2% | +16.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.1% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.7% | +194.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.9% | +211.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.8% | +233.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.4% | +43.3% |
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWO's 0.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs TWO's 86.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.17 | $219.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.78 | $142.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.5% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.0 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.7M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TWO and WELL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TWO as "Hold" and WELL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.3% upside for TWO (target: $14) vs 4.6% for WELL (target: $227). For income investors, TWO offers the higher dividend yield at 13.39% vs WELL's 1.28%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $226.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +13.4% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.64 | $2.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
WELL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TWO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TWO vs WELL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TWO or WELL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 4% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). Welltower Inc. (WELL) offers the better valuation at 155. 7x trailing P/E (79. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Welltower Inc. (WELL) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TWO or WELL?
On forward P/E, Two Harbors Investment Corp.
is actually cheaper at 11. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TWO or WELL?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +211. 9%, compared to -17. 9% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +233. 9% versus TWO's -5. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TWO or WELL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Two Harbors Investment Corp. 's 0. 49β — meaning TWO is approximately 270% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 5% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TWO or WELL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -28. 4% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Welltower Inc. grew EPS -11. 5% year-over-year, compared to -284. 0% for Two Harbors Investment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TWO leads at 263. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TWO or WELL?
Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus -75. 0% for Two Harbors Investment Corp. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TWO leads at 68. 7% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TWO leads at 97. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TWO or WELL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Two Harbors Investment Corp.
(TWO) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 79. 7x for Welltower Inc. — 67. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TWO: 14. 3% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TWO or WELL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) offers the highest yield at 13. 4%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is TWO or WELL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +233. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +233. 9%, TWO: -5. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TWO and WELL?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TWO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.