Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TXMD vs DARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
TXMD vs DARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $23M | $25M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $-57K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $302K | $-17M |
| Gross Margin | 96.6% | -1461.1% |
| Operating Margin | -97.1% | -2396.9% |
| Total Debt | $7M | $1M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $16M |
TXMD vs DARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TherapeuticsMD, Inc. (TXMD) | 100 | 3.6 | -96.4% |
| Daré Bioscience, In… (DARE) | 100 | 23.1 | -76.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TXMD vs DARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TXMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 35.3%, EPS growth 74.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.9%
- 35.3% revenue growth vs DARE's -99.7%
- 10.8% margin vs DARE's -414.3%
DARE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.48
- -99.0% 10Y total return vs TXMD's -99.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, current ratio 0.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.3% revenue growth vs DARE's -99.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs DARE's -414.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs TXMD's 0.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.7% vs DARE's +0.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.8% ROA vs DARE's -56.8% |
TXMD vs DARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TXMD vs DARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXMD and DARE operate at a comparable scale, with $3M and -$57,130 in trailing revenue. TXMD is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DARE's -414.3%. On growth, TXMD holds the edge at +43.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | -$57,130 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $302,000 | -$17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.6% | -1461.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -97.1% | -2396.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | -414.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +74.0% | +492.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.3% | -94.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +118.9% | +49.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TXMD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $25M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $11M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.58x | -6.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.21x | 2587.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.85x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.78x | 5.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXMD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXMD delivers a 1.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-6 for DARE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXMD scores 6/9 vs DARE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | -56.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.6% | -36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $16M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $1M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -194.43x | -35.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TXMD and DARE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DARE five years ago would be worth $1,757 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $369 for TXMD. Over the past 12 months, TXMD leads with a +45.7% total return vs DARE's +0.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXMD at -19.7% vs DARE's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.8% | +49.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.7% | +0.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.2% | -75.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -82.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -99.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.7% | -37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXMD and DARE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DARE is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TXMD's 0.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXMD currently trades 68.1% from its 52-week high vs DARE's 31.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.95 | $9.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $1.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.1% | +31.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.3 | 70.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21K | 581K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TXMD leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
TXMD vs DARE: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TXMD or DARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TherapeuticsMD, Inc.
(TXMD) is the stronger pick with 35. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -99. 7% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. (DARE). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TXMD or DARE?
Over the past 5 years, Daré Bioscience, Inc.
(DARE) delivered a total return of -82. 4%, compared to -96. 3% for TherapeuticsMD, Inc. (TXMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DARE returned -99. 0% versus TXMD's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TXMD or DARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Daré Bioscience, Inc.
(DARE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus TherapeuticsMD, Inc. 's 0. 51β — meaning TXMD is approximately 7% more volatile than DARE relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — TXMD or DARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TherapeuticsMD, Inc.
(TXMD) is pulling ahead at 35. 3% versus -99. 7% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. (DARE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Daré Bioscience, Inc. grew EPS 88. 4% year-over-year, compared to 74. 3% for TherapeuticsMD, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TXMD or DARE?
TherapeuticsMD, Inc.
(TXMD) is the more profitable company, earning -123. 9% net margin versus -414. 3% for Daré Bioscience, Inc. — meaning it keeps -123. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXMD leads at -270. 3% versus -2396. 9% for DARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXMD leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TXMD or DARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is TXMD or DARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Daré Bioscience, Inc.
(DARE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DARE: -99. 0%, TXMD: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TXMD and DARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TXMD is a small-cap high-growth stock; DARE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.