Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TXO vs BSM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
TXO vs BSM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $683M | $2.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $355M | $468M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-98M | $297M |
| Gross Margin | -4.5% | 78.0% |
| Operating Margin | -14.5% | 76.6% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $291M | $154M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $1M |
TXO vs BSM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXO Partners, L.P. (TXO) | 100 | 55.2 | -44.8% |
| Black Stone Mineral… (BSM) | 100 | 83.4 | -16.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TXO vs BSM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TXO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 16.5%
- Rev growth 45.5%, EPS growth -166.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.62x
BSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 56.6% 10Y total return vs TXO's -15.6%
- Lower P/E (14.9x vs 20.8x)
- 63.5% margin vs TXO's -27.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.5% revenue growth vs BSM's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.9x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 63.5% margin vs TXO's -27.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs BSM's 0.15 | |
| Dividends | 16.5% yield, vs BSM's 9.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.0% vs TXO's -16.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 30.7% ROA vs TXO's -7.7%, ROIC 16.1% vs 1.7% |
TXO vs BSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TXO vs BSM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSM and TXO operate at a comparable scale, with $468M and $355M in trailing revenue. BSM is the more profitable business, keeping 63.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TXO's -27.7%. On growth, BSM holds the edge at +63.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $355M | $468M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $398M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$98M | $297M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$144M | $161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +78.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.5% | +76.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +63.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -40.4% | +34.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.5% | +63.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.4% | -31.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TXO leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TXO's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BSM's 10.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $683M | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $965M | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.77x | 10.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.79x | 14.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.12x | 10.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.66x | 6.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 2.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSM leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSM delivers a 35.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-12 for TXO. BSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TXO's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSM scores 5/9 vs TXO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | +35.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.7% | +30.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +16.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +20.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $282M | $153M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $291M | $154M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.67x | 40.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BSM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSM five years ago would be worth $19,806 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,441 for TXO. Over the past 12 months, BSM leads with a +6.0% total return vs TXO's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSM at 5.0% vs TXO's -5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.8% | +6.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.7% | +15.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.6% | +98.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.6% | +56.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.5% | +5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXO and BSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXO is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BSM's 0.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BSM currently trades 87.6% from its 52-week high vs TXO's 69.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.90 | $15.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.12 | $11.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.1% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 37.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 202K | 425K |
Analyst Outlook
TXO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TXO as "Strong Buy" and BSM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for TXO (target: $18) vs 27.7% for BSM (target: $17). For income investors, TXO offers the higher dividend yield at 16.47% vs BSM's 9.94%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Strong Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $17.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.5% | +9.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
BSM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TXO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
TXO vs BSM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TXO or BSM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is the stronger pick with 45. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Black Stone Minerals, L. P. (BSM). Black Stone Minerals, L. P. (BSM) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) a "Strong Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TXO or BSM?
On forward P/E, Black Stone Minerals, L.
P. is actually cheaper at 14. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TXO or BSM?
Over the past 5 years, Black Stone Minerals, L.
P. (BSM) delivered a total return of +98. 1%, compared to -15. 6% for TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSM returned +56. 6% versus TXO's -15. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TXO or BSM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Black Stone Minerals, L. P. 's 0. 15β — meaning BSM is approximately 222% more volatile than TXO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Black Stone Minerals, L. P. (BSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 32% for TXO Partners, L. P. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TXO or BSM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is pulling ahead at 45. 5% versus -3. 9% for Black Stone Minerals, L. P. (BSM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Black Stone Minerals, L. P. grew EPS 11. 3% year-over-year, compared to -166. 2% for TXO Partners, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXO leads at 18. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TXO or BSM?
Black Stone Minerals, L.
P. (BSM) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 0% net margin versus -5. 3% for TXO Partners, L. P. — meaning it keeps 71. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSM leads at 61. 8% versus 5. 4% for TXO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSM leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TXO or BSM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Black Stone Minerals, L.
P. (BSM) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for TXO Partners, L. P. — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TXO: 45. 5% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TXO or BSM?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) offers the highest yield at 16. 5%, versus 9. 9% for Black Stone Minerals, L. P. (BSM).
09Is TXO or BSM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 16. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXO: -15. 6%, BSM: +56. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TXO and BSM?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TXO is a small-cap high-growth stock; BSM is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.