Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TXO vs CIVI vs HAL vs SLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
TXO vs CIVI vs HAL vs SLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $691M | $2.34B | $32.68B | $79.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $355M | $4.71B | $22.17B | $35.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-98M | $638M | $1.54B | $3.35B |
| Gross Margin | -4.5% | 43.9% | 15.3% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -14.5% | 31.1% | 11.3% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 21.0x | 6.8x | 16.8x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $291M | $4.49B | $8.13B | $12.31B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $76M | $2.21B | $3.04B |
TXO vs CIVI vs HAL vs SLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXO Partners, L.P. (TXO) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 94.9 | -5.1% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 93.1 | -6.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TXO vs CIVI vs HAL vs SLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TXO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 16.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.62x
- Beta 0.05, yield 16.3%, current ratio 0.62x
- Beta 0.05 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage
CIVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3%
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 19.8x)
- 13.6% margin vs TXO's -27.7%
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 16.2% 10Y total return vs SLB's -9.2%
- +105.6% vs TXO's -16.4%
SLB is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 6.5% ROA vs TXO's -7.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs 1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 19.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs TXO's -27.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.2% yield, vs SLB's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +105.6% vs TXO's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs TXO's -7.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs 1.7% |
TXO vs CIVI vs HAL vs SLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TXO vs CIVI vs HAL vs SLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CIVI leads in 2 of 6 categories
SLB leads 1 • HAL leads 1 • TXO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 100.5x TXO's $355M. CIVI is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TXO's -27.7%. On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $355M | $4.7B | $22.2B | $35.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $3.4B | $3.4B | $7.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$98M | $638M | $1.5B | $3.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$144M | $934M | $1.7B | $4.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +43.9% | +15.3% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.5% | +31.1% | +11.3% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +13.6% | +6.9% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -40.4% | +19.8% | +7.6% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.5% | -8.1% | -0.3% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.4% | -33.9% | +129.2% | -31.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 88% valuation discount to HAL's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLB's 12.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $691M | $2.3B | $32.7B | $79.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $972M | $6.8B | $38.6B | $88.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.07x | 3.24x | 26.09x | 22.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.01x | 6.75x | 16.85x | 19.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.15x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.18x | 1.89x | 11.37x | 12.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 0.45x | 1.47x | 2.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 0.41x | 3.13x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.61x | 19.55x | 16.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-12 for TXO. TXO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIVI scores 5/9 vs TXO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | +9.5% | +14.6% | +13.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.7% | +4.2% | +6.1% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +10.8% | +10.2% | +12.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +12.1% | +11.6% | +14.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.68x | 0.77x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $282M | $4.4B | $5.9B | $9.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $76M | $2.2B | $3.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $291M | $4.5B | $8.1B | $12.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.67x | 2.80x | 9.19x | 9.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAL five years ago would be worth $18,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,500 for TXO. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +105.6% total return vs TXO's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAL at 11.2% vs CIVI's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.5% | -1.5% | +32.8% | +32.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.4% | +6.8% | +105.6% | +61.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.1% | -41.7% | +37.4% | +20.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | +31.9% | +82.6% | +80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | -86.2% | +16.2% | -9.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.3% | -16.5% | +11.2% | +6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXO and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXO is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLB currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs TXO's 69.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 1.10x | 0.57x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.90 | $37.45 | $42.46 | $57.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.12 | $25.38 | $19.22 | $31.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.8% | +73.1% | +92.2% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 54.8 | 55.7 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 22.4M | 15.0M | 16.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CIVI and HAL and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TXO as "Strong Buy", CIVI as "Hold", HAL as "Buy", SLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.0% upside for TXO (target: $18) vs -5.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs HAL's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Strong Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $31.00 | $37.08 | $56.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 16 | 64 | 66 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.3% | +18.2% | +1.8% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $4.98 | $0.69 | $1.08 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +18.3% | +3.1% | +3.0% |
CIVI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SLB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
TXO vs CIVI vs HAL vs SLB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TXO or CIVI or HAL or SLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) a "Strong Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TXO or CIVI or HAL or SLB?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TXO or CIVI or HAL or SLB?
Over the past 5 years, Halliburton Company (HAL) delivered a total return of +82.
6%, compared to -15. 0% for TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HAL returned +16. 2% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TXO or CIVI or HAL or SLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately 2225% more volatile than TXO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TXO or CIVI or HAL or SLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Civitas Resources, Inc. grew EPS -6. 2% year-over-year, compared to -166. 2% for TXO Partners, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TXO or CIVI or HAL or SLB?
Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -5. 3% for TXO Partners, L. P. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CIVI leads at 29. 0% versus 5. 4% for TXO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CIVI leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TXO or CIVI or HAL or SLB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) trades at 6. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 0x for TXO Partners, L. P. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TXO: 44. 0% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TXO or CIVI or HAL or SLB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the highest yield at 18. 2%, versus 1. 8% for Halliburton Company (HAL).
09Is TXO or CIVI or HAL or SLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 16. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXO: -15. 0%, CIVI: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TXO and CIVI and HAL and SLB?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TXO is a small-cap high-growth stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.