TXO
TXO Partners, L.P.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$691M
5Y Perf.-45.0%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
TXO vs PBF vs ET vs MPLX vs EPD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Cap$4.77B
5Y Perf.-3.0%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$68.53B
5Y Perf.+45.6%
MPLX
MPLX Lp
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$57.12B
5Y Perf.+54.6%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$81.56B
5Y Perf.+45.3%
TXO vs PBF vs ET vs MPLX vs EPD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | TXO | PBF | ET | MPLX | EPD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $691M | $4.77B | $68.53B | $57.12B | $81.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $355M | $29.33B | $89.38B | $12.54B | $52.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-98M | $-159M | $5.55B | $4.71B | $5.80B |
| Gross Margin | -4.5% | -1.9% | 22.9% | 60.0% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | -14.5% | -0.2% | 11.1% | 44.9% | 13.5% |
| Forward P/E | 30.4x | 7.5x | 12.7x | 12.3x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $291M | $2.90B | $71.61B | $26.16B | $34.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $528M | $1.27B | $2.14B | $1.25B |
TXO vs PBF vs ET vs MPLX vs EPD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
TXO
PBF
ET
MPLX
EPD
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXO Partners, L.P. (TXO) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| PBF Energy Inc. (PBF) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
| Energy Transfer LP (ET) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| MPLX Lp (MPLX) | 100 | 154.6 | +54.6% |
| Enterprise Products… (EPD) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TXO vs PBF vs ET vs MPLX vs EPD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TXO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. PBF Energy Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. MPLX also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TXO
TXO Partners, L.P.
The Income Pick
TXO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 16.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.62x
- Beta 0.05, yield 16.3%, current ratio 0.62x
- 45.5% revenue growth vs PBF's -11.4%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
The Value Play
PBF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 12.9x)
- +127.3% vs TXO's -16.4%
Best for: value and momentum
ET
Energy Transfer LP
The Income Angle
ET lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: energy exposure
MPLX
MPLX Lp
The Growth Play
MPLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.4%, EPS growth 14.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 184.4% 10Y total return vs ET's 142.6%
- 37.5% margin vs TXO's -27.7%
- 11.3% ROA vs TXO's -7.7%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.7%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
The Income Angle
Among these 5 stocks, EPD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TXO | 45.5% revenue growth vs PBF's -11.4% |
| Value | PBF | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 12.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | MPLX | 37.5% margin vs TXO's -27.7% |
| Stability / Safety | TXO | Beta 0.05 vs ET's 0.19, lower leverage |
| Dividends | TXO | 16.3% yield, vs EPD's 5.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PBF | +127.3% vs TXO's -16.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MPLX | 11.3% ROA vs TXO's -7.7%, ROIC 9.9% vs 1.7% |
TXO vs PBF vs ET vs MPLX vs EPD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2025
TXO vs PBF vs ET vs MPLX vs EPD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMPLXLAGGINGEPD
Who Leads Where
MPLX leads in 2 of 6 categories
PBF leads 1 • TXO leads 0 • ET leads 0 • EPD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓EPDEnterprise Products P…
0leads
ETEnergy Transfer LP
0leads
TXOTXO Partners, L.P.
0leads
PBFPBF Energy Inc.
1leads
MPLXMPLX Lp
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PBFvs TXOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MPLX4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PBF3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MPLX6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ET is the larger business by revenue, generating $89.4B annually — 251.5x TXO's $355M. MPLX is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TXO's -27.7%. On growth, ET holds the edge at +32.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | PBFPBF Energy Inc. | ETEnergy Transfer LP | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $355M | $29.3B | $89.4B | $12.5B | $52.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $600M | $15.5B | $7.0B | $9.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$98M | -$159M | $5.6B | $4.7B | $5.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$144M | -$783M | $5.5B | $5.0B | $3.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | -1.9% | +22.9% | +60.0% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.5% | -0.2% | +11.1% | +44.9% | +13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | -0.5% | +6.2% | +37.5% | +11.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -40.4% | -2.7% | +6.2% | +39.8% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.5% | -2.9% | +32.1% | +5.2% | -2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.4% | +126.2% | -2.8% | -17.3% | +2.7% |
MPLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PBF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, MPLX trades at a 21% valuation discount to ET's 14.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TXO's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPLX's 13.3x.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | PBFPBF Energy Inc. | ETEnergy Transfer LP | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $691M | $4.8B | $68.5B | $57.1B | $81.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $972M | $7.1B | $138.9B | $81.1B | $115.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.07x | -29.20x | 14.76x | 11.67x | 14.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.37x | 7.45x | 12.68x | 12.33x | 12.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.54x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.18x | 11.74x | 9.41x | 13.27x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 0.16x | 0.83x | 4.83x | 1.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 0.86x | 1.48x | 3.95x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 17.82x | 13.93x | 27.51x |
PBF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPLX delivers a 32.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $-12 for TXO. TXO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MPLX's 1.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MPLX scores 6/9 vs PBF's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | PBFPBF Energy Inc. | ETEnergy Transfer LP | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | -3.0% | +11.6% | +32.8% | +19.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.7% | -1.2% | +4.1% | +11.3% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | -0.5% | +6.3% | +9.9% | +8.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | -0.6% | +7.9% | +12.9% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.53x | 1.45x | 1.80x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $282M | $2.4B | $70.3B | $24.0B | $33.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $528M | $1.3B | $2.1B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $291M | $2.9B | $71.6B | $26.2B | $34.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.67x | -3.01x | 2.64x | 5.85x | 5.21x |
MPLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PBF and MPLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PBF five years ago would be worth $26,482 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,500 for TXO. Over the past 12 months, PBF leads with a +127.3% total return vs TXO's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MPLX at 25.1% vs TXO's -5.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | PBFPBF Energy Inc. | ETEnergy Transfer LP | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.5% | +43.2% | +22.1% | +6.4% | +20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.4% | +127.3% | +25.8% | +22.5% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.1% | +33.5% | +90.3% | +95.7% | +73.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | +164.8% | +158.2% | +157.2% | +105.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | +70.2% | +142.6% | +184.4% | +119.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.3% | +10.1% | +23.9% | +25.1% | +20.2% |
Evenly matched — PBF and MPLX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ET and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXO is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ET's 0.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ET currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs TXO's 69.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | PBFPBF Energy Inc. | ETEnergy Transfer LP | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 0.01x | 0.10x | 0.11x | -0.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.90 | $52.18 | $20.66 | $59.98 | $39.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.12 | $17.53 | $16.18 | $47.80 | $29.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.8% | +77.8% | +96.4% | +93.8% | +95.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 47.5 | 59.5 | 46.5 | 47.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 3.7M | 14.8M | 1.8M | 4.1M |
Evenly matched — ET and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TXO and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TXO as "Strong Buy", PBF as "Hold", ET as "Buy", MPLX as "Buy", EPD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.0% upside for TXO (target: $18) vs -8.4% for PBF (target: $37). For income investors, TXO offers the higher dividend yield at 16.30% vs PBF's 2.71%.
| Metric | TXOTXO Partners, L.P. | PBFPBF Energy Inc. | ETEnergy Transfer LP | MPLXMPLX Lp | EPDEnterprise Produc… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Strong Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $37.20 | $19.00 | $60.20 | $37.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 26 | 32 | 28 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.3% | +2.7% | +6.5% | +7.0% | +5.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $1.10 | $1.29 | $3.94 | $2.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.4% |
Evenly matched — TXO and EPD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
MPLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PBF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
Best OverallMPLX Lp (MPLX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
TXO vs PBF vs ET vs MPLX vs EPD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TXO or PBF or ET or MPLX or EPD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is the stronger pick with 45. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF). MPLX Lp (MPLX) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (12. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) a "Strong Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TXO or PBF or ET or MPLX or EPD?
On trailing P/E, MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the cheapest at 11.
7x versus Energy Transfer LP at 14. 8x. On forward P/E, PBF Energy Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TXO or PBF or ET or MPLX or EPD?
Over the past 5 years, PBF Energy Inc.
(PBF) delivered a total return of +164. 8%, compared to -15. 0% for TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPLX returned +180. 5% versus TXO's -15. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TXO or PBF or ET or MPLX or EPD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 00β versus MPLX Lp's 0. 11β — meaning MPLX is approximately -2763% more volatile than EPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 180% for MPLX Lp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TXO or PBF or ET or MPLX or EPD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is pulling ahead at 45. 5% versus -11. 4% for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PBF Energy Inc. grew EPS 69. 8% year-over-year, compared to -166. 2% for TXO Partners, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXO leads at 18. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TXO or PBF or ET or MPLX or EPD?
MPLX Lp (MPLX) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
6% net margin versus -5. 3% for TXO Partners, L. P. — meaning it keeps 41. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPLX leads at 40. 3% versus -0. 2% for PBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPLX leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TXO or PBF or ET or MPLX or EPD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PBF Energy Inc.
(PBF) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 30. 4x for TXO Partners, L. P. — 22. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TXO: 44. 0% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TXO or PBF or ET or MPLX or EPD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) offers the highest yield at 16. 3%, versus 2. 7% for PBF Energy Inc. (PBF).
09Is TXO or PBF or ET or MPLX or EPD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enterprise Products Partners L.
P. (EPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 00), 5. 7% yield, +117. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPD: +117. 7%, TXO: -15. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TXO and PBF and ET and MPLX and EPD?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TXO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PBF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ET is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MPLX is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EPD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(TXO: -66.5% · PBF: -2.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.