Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TXO vs SLB vs HAL vs WTTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Regulated Water
TXO vs SLB vs HAL vs WTTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $691M | $79.62B | $32.68B | $1.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $355M | $35.71B | $22.17B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-98M | $3.35B | $1.54B | $22M |
| Gross Margin | -4.5% | 18.2% | 15.3% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -14.5% | 15.3% | 11.3% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | 21.0x | 19.8x | 16.8x | 41.7x |
| Total Debt | $291M | $12.31B | $8.13B | $374M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $3.04B | $2.21B | $18M |
TXO vs SLB vs HAL vs WTTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXO Partners, L.P. (TXO) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 93.1 | -6.9% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 94.9 | -5.1% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 191.6 | +91.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TXO vs SLB vs HAL vs WTTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TXO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.05, yield 16.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 32.0%, current ratio 0.62x
- Beta 0.05, yield 16.3%, current ratio 0.62x
- 45.5% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3%
SLB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth -24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- 9.4% margin vs TXO's -27.7%
- 6.5% ROA vs TXO's -7.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs 1.7%
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (16.8x vs 41.7x)
WTTR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 26.6% 10Y total return vs HAL's 16.2%
- +134.2% vs TXO's -16.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.5% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 41.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs TXO's -27.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs WTTR's 1.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.3% yield, vs SLB's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.2% vs TXO's -16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs TXO's -7.7%, ROIC 12.1% vs 1.7% |
TXO vs SLB vs HAL vs WTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TXO vs SLB vs HAL vs WTTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SLB leads in 2 of 6 categories
TXO leads 1 • WTTR leads 1 • HAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 100.5x TXO's $355M. SLB is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TXO's -27.7%. On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $355M | $35.7B | $22.2B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $7.4B | $3.4B | $217M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$98M | $3.4B | $1.5B | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$144M | $4.8B | $1.7B | -$95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +18.2% | +15.3% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.5% | +15.3% | +11.3% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | +9.4% | +6.9% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -40.4% | +13.4% | +7.6% | -6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.5% | +5.0% | -0.3% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.4% | -31.2% | +129.2% | -4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TXO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, SLB trades at a 73% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TXO's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLB's 12.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $691M | $79.6B | $32.7B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $972M | $88.9B | $38.6B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -29.07x | 22.57x | 26.09x | 84.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.01x | 19.79x | 16.85x | 41.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.18x | 12.07x | 11.37x | 10.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 2.23x | 1.47x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 2.89x | 3.13x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.60x | 19.55x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-12 for TXO. TXO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAL scores 5/9 vs WTTR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | +13.9% | +14.6% | +2.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.7% | +6.5% | +6.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.7% | +12.1% | +10.2% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +14.3% | +11.6% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.45x | 0.77x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $282M | $9.3B | $5.9B | $356M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $3.0B | $2.2B | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $291M | $12.3B | $8.1B | $374M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.67x | 9.40x | 9.19x | 1.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WTTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTTR five years ago would be worth $25,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,500 for TXO. Over the past 12 months, WTTR leads with a +134.2% total return vs TXO's -16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WTTR at 33.1% vs TXO's -5.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.5% | +32.7% | +32.8% | +52.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.4% | +61.8% | +105.6% | +134.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.1% | +20.8% | +37.4% | +135.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | +80.6% | +82.6% | +158.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | -9.2% | +16.2% | +26.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.3% | +6.5% | +11.2% | +33.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXO and WTTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXO is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WTTR's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTTR currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs TXO's 69.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.05x | 0.87x | 0.57x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.90 | $57.20 | $42.46 | $17.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.12 | $31.64 | $19.22 | $7.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.8% | +92.7% | +92.2% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.4 | 57.9 | 55.7 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 16.3M | 15.0M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TXO and SLB and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TXO as "Strong Buy", SLB as "Buy", HAL as "Buy", WTTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.0% upside for TXO (target: $18) vs -5.2% for HAL (target: $37). For income investors, TXO offers the higher dividend yield at 16.30% vs HAL's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Strong Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $56.95 | $37.08 | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 66 | 64 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.3% | +2.0% | +1.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $1.08 | $0.69 | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +3.1% | +0.4% |
SLB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TXO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TXO vs SLB vs HAL vs WTTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TXO or SLB or HAL or WTTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is the stronger pick with 45. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) a "Strong Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TXO or SLB or HAL or WTTR?
On trailing P/E, SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the cheapest at 22. 6x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 1x. On forward P/E, Halliburton Company is actually cheaper at 16. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TXO or SLB or HAL or WTTR?
Over the past 5 years, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) delivered a total return of +158. 4%, compared to -15. 0% for TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WTTR returned +26. 6% versus TXO's -15. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TXO or SLB or HAL or WTTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 09β — meaning WTTR is approximately 2205% more volatile than TXO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TXO or SLB or HAL or WTTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is pulling ahead at 45. 5% versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SLB N. V. grew EPS -24. 4% year-over-year, compared to -166. 2% for TXO Partners, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXO leads at 18. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TXO or SLB or HAL or WTTR?
SLB N.
V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -5. 3% for TXO Partners, L. P. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLB leads at 15. 3% versus 2. 5% for WTTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLB leads at 18. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TXO or SLB or HAL or WTTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halliburton Company (HAL) trades at 16.
8x forward P/E versus 41. 7x for Select Water Solutions, Inc. — 24. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TXO: 44. 0% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TXO or SLB or HAL or WTTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TXO Partners, L. P. (TXO) offers the highest yield at 16. 3%, versus 1. 8% for Halliburton Company (HAL).
09Is TXO or SLB or HAL or WTTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TXO Partners, L.
P. (TXO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 16. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXO: -15. 0%, WTTR: +26. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TXO and SLB and HAL and WTTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (TXO (Energy) and SLB (Energy) and HAL (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TXO is a small-cap high-growth stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WTTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.