Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TXRH vs DENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
TXRH vs DENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $10.58B | $322M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.83B | $457M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $437M | $10M |
| Gross Margin | 16.7% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 25.3x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $854M | $408M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $245M | $2M |
TXRH vs DENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 308.0 | +208.0% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 57.4 | -42.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TXRH vs DENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TXRH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 16.0%, EPS growth 42.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.8%
- 302.2% 10Y total return vs DENN's -41.7%
DENN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 0.65, current ratio 0.42x
- Lower P/E (15.0x vs 25.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.0% revenue growth vs DENN's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.0x vs 25.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.5% margin vs DENN's 2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs TXRH's 0.70 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +59.8% vs TXRH's -5.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs DENN's 2.0%, ROIC 20.4% vs 9.7% |
TXRH vs DENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TXRH vs DENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 12.8x DENN's $457M. TXRH is the more profitable business, keeping 7.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DENN's 2.2%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.8B | $457M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $718M | $55M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $437M | $10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $341M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +43.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.8% | -89.9% |
Valuation Metrics
DENN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, DENN trades at a 38% valuation discount to TXRH's 24.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DENN's 12.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TXRH's 16.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.6B | $322M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.2B | $728M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.68x | 15.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.33x | 15.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.10x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.97x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.79x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.49x | 350.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXRH scores 9/9 vs DENN's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.4% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.4% | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +23.4% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $609M | $406M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $245M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $854M | $408M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $16,535 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,551 for DENN. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +59.8% total return vs TXRH's -5.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 15.8% vs DENN's -16.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.1% | +59.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.3% | -41.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.3% | -64.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +302.2% | -41.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.8% | -16.3% |
Risk & Volatility
DENN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DENN is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TXRH's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs TXRH's 79.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $199.99 | $6.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $153.82 | $3.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.8% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 958K | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
TXRH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TXRH as "Hold" and DENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.0% upside for TXRH (target: $192) vs -4.0% for DENN (target: $6). TXRH is the only dividend payer here at 1.52% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $191.64 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 43 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.43 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +3.6% |
TXRH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DENN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
TXRH vs DENN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TXRH or DENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 16. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Denny's Corporation (DENN) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TXRH or DENN?
On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. at 24. 7x. On forward P/E, Denny's Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TXRH or DENN?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) delivered a total return of +65. 3%, compared to -64. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +302. 2% versus DENN's -41. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TXRH or DENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 0. 70β — meaning TXRH is approximately 7% more volatile than DENN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — TXRH or DENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 16. 0% versus -2. 5% for Denny's Corporation (DENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Texas Roadhouse, Inc. grew EPS 42. 5% year-over-year, compared to 17. 1% for Denny's Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 15. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TXRH or DENN?
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 1% net margin versus 4. 8% for Denny's Corporation — meaning it keeps 8. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DENN leads at 10. 0% versus 9. 6% for TXRH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DENN leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TXRH or DENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Denny's Corporation (DENN) trades at 15.
0x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — 10. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TXRH: 20. 0% to $191. 64.
08Which pays a better dividend — TXRH or DENN?
In this comparison, TXRH (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. DENN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TXRH or DENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 1. 5% yield, +302. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +302. 2%, DENN: -41. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TXRH and DENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TXRH is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock. TXRH pays a dividend while DENN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.