Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TXT vs LMT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TXT
Textron Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$15.95B
5Y Perf.+195.7%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$118.09B
5Y Perf.+31.9%

TXT vs LMT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TXT logoTXT
LMT logoLMT
IndustryAerospace & DefenseAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$15.95B$118.09B
Revenue (TTM)$15.19B$75.11B
Net Income (TTM)$934M$4.79B
Gross Margin14.4%9.8%
Operating Margin8.4%9.9%
Forward P/E14.2x17.1x
Total Debt$4.28B$21.70B
Cash & Equiv.$2.02B$4.12B

TXT vs LMTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TXT
LMT
StockMay 20May 26Return
Textron Inc. (TXT)100295.7+195.7%
Lockheed Martin Cor… (LMT)100131.9+31.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TXT vs LMT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LMT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Textron Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
TXT
Textron Inc.
The Growth Play

TXT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 18.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 54.4%, current ratio 1.84x
  • 8.0% revenue growth vs LMT's 5.7%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
The Income Pick

LMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
  • 156.2% 10Y total return vs TXT's 142.8%
  • Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.09x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTXT logoTXT8.0% revenue growth vs LMT's 5.7%
ValueTXT logoTXTLower P/E (14.2x vs 17.1x)
Quality / MarginsLMT logoLMT6.4% margin vs TXT's 6.1%
Stability / SafetyLMT logoLMTBeta 0.12 vs TXT's 0.90
DividendsLMT logoLMT2.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs TXT's 0.1%
Momentum (1Y)TXT logoTXT+31.0% vs LMT's +11.6%
Efficiency (ROA)LMT logoLMT8.0% ROA vs TXT's 5.3%, ROIC 23.9% vs 9.4%

TXT vs LMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TXTTextron Inc.
FY 2025
Textron Aviation
40.6%$6.0B
Bell
29.1%$4.3B
Industrial
21.8%$3.2B
Textron Systems
8.5%$1.2B
LMTLockheed Martin Corporation
FY 2025
Aeronautics
40.3%$30.3B
Rotary and Mission Systems
23.1%$17.3B
Missiles And Fire Control
19.3%$14.4B
Space
17.4%$13.0B

TXT vs LMT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTXTLAGGINGLMT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — TXT and LMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $75.1B annually — 4.9x TXT's $15.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.4% (LMT) to 6.1% (TXT). On growth, TXT holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTXT logoTXTTextron Inc.LMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$15.2B$75.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.7B$8.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$934M$4.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$707M$5.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+14.4%+9.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.4%+9.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.1%+6.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+4.7%+7.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.8%+0.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+10.6%-11.5%
Evenly matched — TXT and LMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TXT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 17.9x trailing earnings, TXT trades at a 25% valuation discount to LMT's 23.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TXT's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LMT's 16.1x.

MetricTXT logoTXTTextron Inc.LMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…
Market CapShares × price$15.9B$118.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18.2B$135.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.92x23.84x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.16x17.12x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.59x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.03x16.07x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.08x1.57x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.10x17.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.04x17.09x
TXT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TXT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

LMT delivers a 74.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $75 in annual profit, vs $12 for TXT. TXT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LMT's 3.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXT scores 7/9 vs LMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTXT logoTXTTextron Inc.LMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.1%+74.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.3%+8.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.4%+23.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.5%+21.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x3.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.3B$17.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.0B$4.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.3B$21.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.38x6.08x
TXT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TXT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LMT five years ago would be worth $14,693 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,512 for TXT. Over the past 12 months, TXT leads with a +31.0% total return vs LMT's +11.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXT at 11.8% vs LMT's 6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTXT logoTXTTextron Inc.LMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+5.2%+3.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+31.0%+11.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+39.8%+22.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+35.1%+46.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+142.8%+156.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+11.8%+6.9%
TXT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TXT and LMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TXT's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXT currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs LMT's 74.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTXT logoTXTTextron Inc.LMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.90x0.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$101.57$692.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$69.60$410.11
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.2%+74.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.828.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M1.5M
Evenly matched — TXT and LMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates TXT as "Hold" and LMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.9% upside for LMT (target: $635) vs 13.3% for TXT (target: $104). For income investors, LMT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.63% vs TXT's 0.12%.

MetricTXT logoTXTTextron Inc.LMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$103.80$635.11
# AnalystsCovering analysts2937
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises223
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11$13.50
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.8%+2.5%
LMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TXT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LMT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallTextron Inc. (TXT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TXT vs LMT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TXT or LMT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Textron Inc.

(TXT) is the stronger pick with 8. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Textron Inc. (TXT) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TXT or LMT?

On trailing P/E, Textron Inc.

(TXT) is the cheapest at 17. 9x versus Lockheed Martin Corporation at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, Textron Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TXT or LMT?

Over the past 5 years, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) delivered a total return of +46.

9%, compared to +35. 1% for Textron Inc. (TXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LMT returned +156. 2% versus TXT's +142. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TXT or LMT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

12β versus Textron Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning TXT is approximately 628% more volatile than LMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Textron Inc. (TXT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 3% for Lockheed Martin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TXT or LMT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Textron Inc.

(TXT) is pulling ahead at 8. 0% versus 5. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Textron Inc. grew EPS 18. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXT leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TXT or LMT?

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

7% net margin versus 6. 2% for Textron Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LMT leads at 10. 3% versus 8. 4% for TXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXT leads at 16. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TXT or LMT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Textron Inc.

(TXT) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Lockheed Martin Corporation — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LMT: 23. 9% to $635. 11.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TXT or LMT?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 1% for Textron Inc. (TXT).

09

Is TXT or LMT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

12), 2. 6% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMT: +156. 2%, TXT: +142. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TXT and LMT?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: TXT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LMT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LMT pays a dividend while TXT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

TXT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LMT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TXT and LMT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TXT: 11.8% · LMT: 0.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(TXT: 6.1% · LMT: 6.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(TXT: 17.9x · LMT: 23.8x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.