Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TXT vs LMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
TXT vs LMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $15.95B | $118.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.19B | $75.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $934M | $4.79B |
| Gross Margin | 14.4% | 9.8% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.28B | $21.70B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.02B | $4.12B |
TXT vs LMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Textron Inc. (TXT) | 100 | 295.7 | +195.7% |
| Lockheed Martin Cor… (LMT) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TXT vs LMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TXT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 18.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 54.4%, current ratio 1.84x
- 8.0% revenue growth vs LMT's 5.7%
LMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- 156.2% 10Y total return vs TXT's 142.8%
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.09x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% revenue growth vs LMT's 5.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 17.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.4% margin vs TXT's 6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs TXT's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs TXT's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.0% vs LMT's +11.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs TXT's 5.3%, ROIC 23.9% vs 9.4% |
TXT vs LMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TXT vs LMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TXT and LMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $75.1B annually — 4.9x TXT's $15.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 6.4% (LMT) to 6.1% (TXT). On growth, TXT holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.2B | $75.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $8.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $934M | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $707M | $5.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +9.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +7.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.6% | -11.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TXT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.9x trailing earnings, TXT trades at a 25% valuation discount to LMT's 23.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TXT's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LMT's 16.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15.9B | $118.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.2B | $135.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.92x | 23.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.16x | 17.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.59x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.03x | 16.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 1.57x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.10x | 17.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.04x | 17.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LMT delivers a 74.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $75 in annual profit, vs $12 for TXT. TXT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LMT's 3.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TXT scores 7/9 vs LMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +74.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +23.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | +21.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 3.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $17.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $4.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $21.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.38x | 6.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LMT five years ago would be worth $14,693 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,512 for TXT. Over the past 12 months, TXT leads with a +31.0% total return vs LMT's +11.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXT at 11.8% vs LMT's 6.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.2% | +3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.0% | +11.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.8% | +22.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.1% | +46.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.8% | +156.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.8% | +6.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXT and LMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TXT's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TXT currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs LMT's 74.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $101.57 | $692.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.60 | $410.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +74.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 28.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
LMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates TXT as "Hold" and LMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.9% upside for LMT (target: $635) vs 13.3% for TXT (target: $104). For income investors, LMT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.63% vs TXT's 0.12%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.80 | $635.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | $13.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.8% | +2.5% |
TXT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LMT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
TXT vs LMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TXT or LMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Textron Inc.
(TXT) is the stronger pick with 8. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Textron Inc. (TXT) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (14. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TXT or LMT?
On trailing P/E, Textron Inc.
(TXT) is the cheapest at 17. 9x versus Lockheed Martin Corporation at 23. 8x. On forward P/E, Textron Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TXT or LMT?
Over the past 5 years, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) delivered a total return of +46.
9%, compared to +35. 1% for Textron Inc. (TXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LMT returned +156. 2% versus TXT's +142. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TXT or LMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Textron Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning TXT is approximately 628% more volatile than LMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Textron Inc. (TXT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 3% for Lockheed Martin Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TXT or LMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Textron Inc.
(TXT) is pulling ahead at 8. 0% versus 5. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Textron Inc. grew EPS 18. 0% year-over-year, compared to -3. 7% for Lockheed Martin Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXT leads at 4. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TXT or LMT?
Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
7% net margin versus 6. 2% for Textron Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LMT leads at 10. 3% versus 8. 4% for TXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXT leads at 16. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TXT or LMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Textron Inc.
(TXT) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Lockheed Martin Corporation — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LMT: 23. 9% to $635. 11.
08Which pays a better dividend — TXT or LMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 0. 1% for Textron Inc. (TXT).
09Is TXT or LMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMT: +156. 2%, TXT: +142. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TXT and LMT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TXT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LMT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LMT pays a dividend while TXT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.