Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TYGO vs BE vs ENPH vs SPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Solar
Solar
TYGO vs BE vs ENPH vs SPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $330M | $62.18B | $4.67B | $866M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $110M | $2.45B | $1.40B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $6M | $135M | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 43.7% | 31.1% | 44.2% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | -2.7% | 8.2% | 6.8% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 123.6x | 17.6x | 5.1x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $2.99B | $1.24B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $2.45B | $474M | $10M |
TYGO vs BE vs ENPH vs SPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tigo Energy, Inc. (TYGO) | 100 | 19.9 | -80.1% |
| Bloom Energy Corpor… (BE) | 100 | 1448.2 | +1348.2% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 23.4 | -76.6% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TYGO vs BE vs ENPH vs SPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TYGO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 91.7%, EPS growth 97.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 9.7%, current ratio 1.50x
- Beta 1.62, current ratio 1.50x
- 91.7% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9%
BE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.4%
- +14.6% vs SPWR's -42.4%
ENPH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 9.6% margin vs SPWR's -13.2%
- 4.2% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 6.8% vs -5.3%
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.13
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 17.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.7% revenue growth vs SPWR's 2.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 17.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs SPWR's -13.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.62 vs BE's 3.61, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.6% vs SPWR's -42.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 6.8% vs -5.3% |
TYGO vs BE vs ENPH vs SPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TYGO vs BE vs ENPH vs SPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPWR leads 1 • TYGO leads 0 • ENPH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.4B annually — 22.3x TYGO's $110M. ENPH is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWR's -13.2%. On growth, BE holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $110M | $2.4B | $1.4B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $240M | $171M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $6M | $135M | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $726,000 | $233M | $145M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | +31.1% | +44.2% | +50.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +8.2% | +6.8% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +0.2% | +9.6% | -13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +9.5% | +10.4% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.7% | +130.4% | -20.6% | -0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.8% | +3.3% | -127.3% | -101.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ENPH and SPWR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ENPH's 22.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BE's 508.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $330M | $62.2B | $4.7B | $866M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $325M | $62.7B | $5.4B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -145.00x | -699.03x | 27.50x | -15.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 123.56x | 17.61x | 5.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 508.37x | 22.19x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.19x | 30.72x | 3.17x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.24x | 78.41x | 4.40x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.19x | 1087.24x | 48.75x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TYGO and ENPH each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TYGO delivers a 16.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $1 for BE. TYGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BE's 3.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TYGO scores 6/9 vs BE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.4% | +0.8% | +13.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +0.2% | +4.2% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -11.0% | +4.1% | +6.8% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.5% | +2.5% | +6.8% | -7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 3.77x | 1.14x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $538M | $769M | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $2.5B | $474M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $3.0B | $1.2B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.37x | 1.05x | 47.60x | -1.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BE five years ago would be worth $111,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, BE leads with a +1464.7% total return vs SPWR's -42.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BE at 148.0% vs SPWR's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +188.1% | +162.1% | +5.1% | -38.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +383.3% | +1464.7% | -18.9% | -42.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.2% | +1425.9% | -78.3% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.8% | +1013.4% | -71.2% | -81.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.8% | +934.6% | +1737.8% | -81.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.2% | +148.0% | -39.9% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TYGO and BE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TYGO is the less volatile stock with a 1.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BE's 3.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BE currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 3.61x | 1.70x | 2.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.33 | $302.99 | $54.43 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.81 | $16.18 | $25.78 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.7% | +85.4% | +65.2% | +44.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 72.6 | 52.1 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 547K | 10.1M | 5.9M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SPWR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TYGO as "Buy", BE as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold", SPWR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs -31.0% for TYGO (target: $3).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.00 | $187.56 | $43.48 | $15.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 31 | 55 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.8% | 0.0% |
BE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SPWR leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
TYGO vs BE vs ENPH vs SPWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TYGO or BE or ENPH or SPWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tigo Energy, Inc.
(TYGO) is the stronger pick with 91. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tigo Energy, Inc. (TYGO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TYGO or BE or ENPH or SPWR?
On forward P/E, SunPower Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TYGO or BE or ENPH or SPWR?
Over the past 5 years, Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) delivered a total return of +1013%, compared to -81.
3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1738% versus SPWR's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TYGO or BE or ENPH or SPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tigo Energy, Inc.
(TYGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 62β versus Bloom Energy Corporation's 3. 61β — meaning BE is approximately 122% more volatile than TYGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tigo Energy, Inc. (TYGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 4% for Bloom Energy Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TYGO or BE or ENPH or SPWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tigo Energy, Inc.
(TYGO) is pulling ahead at 91. 7% versus 2. 9% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tigo Energy, Inc. grew EPS 97. 1% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Bloom Energy Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TYGO or BE or ENPH or SPWR?
Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -10. 5% for SunPower Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENPH leads at 11. 2% versus -4. 3% for TYGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TYGO or BE or ENPH or SPWR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 123. 6x for Bloom Energy Corporation — 118. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — TYGO or BE or ENPH or SPWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TYGO or BE or ENPH or SPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1738% 10Y return). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1738%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TYGO and BE and ENPH and SPWR?
These companies operate in different sectors (TYGO (Energy) and BE (Industrials) and ENPH (Energy) and SPWR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TYGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; BE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.