Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TZUP vs CRDO vs MRVL vs IZEA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
Internet Content & Information
TZUP vs CRDO vs MRVL vs IZEA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $76M | $34.69B | $138.57B | $80M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $707.00 | $1.07B | $8.19B | $31M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $340M | $2.67B | $42K |
| Gross Margin | -47.4% | 67.8% | 51.0% | 48.1% |
| Operating Margin | -23530.5% | 30.2% | 16.1% | -6.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 57.0x | 41.7x | 1917.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $16M | $4.47B | $9K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $236M | $2.64B | $51M |
TZUP vs CRDO vs MRVL vs IZEA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 22 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thumzup Media Corpo… (TZUP) | 100 | 50.2 | -49.8% |
| Credo Technology Gr… (CRDO) | 100 | 1166.1 | +1066.1% |
| Marvell Technology,… (MRVL) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TZUP vs CRDO vs MRVL vs IZEA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TZUP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 0.2%
- Beta 1.30, yield 0.2%, current ratio 14.44x
- 0.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MRVL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
CRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 126.3%, EPS growth 261.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.1%
- 126.3% revenue growth vs TZUP's -63.8%
- +288.8% vs TZUP's -25.4%
- 26.1% ROA vs TZUP's -31.9%, ROIC 5.9% vs -33.5%
MRVL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 15.8% 10Y total return vs CRDO's 15.2%
- Lower P/E (41.7x vs 57.0x)
- 32.6% margin vs TZUP's -23K%
IZEA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 6.44x
- Beta 0.45 vs CRDO's 2.99, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 126.3% revenue growth vs TZUP's -63.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (41.7x vs 57.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.6% margin vs TZUP's -23K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs CRDO's 2.99, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MRVL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +288.8% vs TZUP's -25.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.1% ROA vs TZUP's -31.9%, ROIC 5.9% vs -33.5% |
TZUP vs CRDO vs MRVL vs IZEA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TZUP vs CRDO vs MRVL vs IZEA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRDO leads in 2 of 6 categories
IZEA leads 1 • TZUP leads 1 • MRVL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRDO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRVL is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.2B annually — 11590664.8x TZUP's $707. MRVL is the more profitable business, keeping 32.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TZUP's -23314.3%. On growth, CRDO holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $707 | $1.1B | $8.2B | $31M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $340M | $2.3B | -$1M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $340M | $2.7B | $42,326 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $284M | $1.4B | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -47.4% | +67.8% | +51.0% | +48.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -23530.5% | +30.2% | +16.1% | -6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -23314.3% | +31.8% | +32.6% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13584.7% | +26.6% | +17.0% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +156.7% | +2.0% | +22.1% | -44.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.8% | +4.1% | +100.0% | +76.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IZEA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 52.1x trailing earnings, MRVL trades at a 97% valuation discount to IZEA's 1917.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MRVL's 106.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRDO's 583.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $76M | $34.7B | $138.6B | $80M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $72M | $34.5B | $140.4B | $29M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.22x | 649.28x | 52.12x | 1917.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 56.97x | 41.72x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 8.80x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 583.58x | 106.14x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9999.00x | 79.42x | 16.91x | 2.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.74x | 50.05x | 9.73x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1195.22x | 99.24x | 32.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CRDO and MRVL each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRDO delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-32 for TZUP. IZEA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MRVL's 0.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CRDO scores 7/9 vs TZUP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.5% | +29.6% | +19.4% | +0.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.9% | +26.1% | +12.6% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.5% | +5.9% | +6.0% | -124.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -154.2% | +5.9% | +7.1% | -3.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 0.31x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$220M | $1.8B | -$51M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $236M | $2.6B | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $16M | $4.5B | $9,106 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -166.94x | — | 15.17x | -290.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CRDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRDO five years ago would be worth $161,622 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,106 for IZEA. Over the past 12 months, CRDO leads with a +288.8% total return vs TZUP's -25.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CRDO at 191.8% vs TZUP's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +31.5% | +79.1% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.4% | +288.8% | +184.6% | +126.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.5% | +2384.0% | +291.9% | +79.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.9% | +1516.2% | +250.8% | -68.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.9% | +1516.2% | +1581.3% | -83.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.0% | +191.8% | +57.7% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MRVL and IZEA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IZEA is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRDO's 2.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRVL currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs TZUP's 28.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 2.99x | 2.21x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.49 | $213.80 | $175.79 | $5.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.83 | $46.09 | $53.78 | $1.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.0% | +88.1% | +91.0% | +75.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.9 | 68.1 | 78.5 | 61.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 145K | 7.2M | 24.8M | 62K |
Analyst Outlook
TZUP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRDO as "Buy", MRVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.3% upside for CRDO (target: $217) vs -19.1% for MRVL (target: $130). For income investors, TZUP offers the higher dividend yield at 0.17% vs MRVL's 0.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $217.10 | $129.52 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 72 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | — | $0.24 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +0.9% |
CRDO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IZEA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TZUP vs CRDO vs MRVL vs IZEA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TZUP or CRDO or MRVL or IZEA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) is the stronger pick with 126.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 8% for Thumzup Media Corporation (TZUP). Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) offers the better valuation at 52. 1x trailing P/E (41. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TZUP or CRDO or MRVL or IZEA?
On trailing P/E, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the cheapest at 52. 1x versus IZEA Worldwide, Inc. at 1917. 4x. On forward P/E, Marvell Technology, Inc. is actually cheaper at 41. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TZUP or CRDO or MRVL or IZEA?
Over the past 5 years, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) delivered a total return of +1516%, compared to -68.
9% for IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRVL returned +1581% versus IZEA's -83. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TZUP or CRDO or MRVL or IZEA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
(IZEA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd's 2. 99β — meaning CRDO is approximately 571% more volatile than IZEA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 31% for Marvell Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TZUP or CRDO or MRVL or IZEA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) is pulling ahead at 126.
3% versus -63. 8% for Thumzup Media Corporation (TZUP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marvell Technology, Inc. grew EPS 401. 0% year-over-year, compared to -6. 4% for Thumzup Media Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRDO leads at 60. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TZUP or CRDO or MRVL or IZEA?
Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 6% net margin versus -5398. 0% for Thumzup Media Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRVL leads at 16. 1% versus -5325. 1% for TZUP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TZUP leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TZUP or CRDO or MRVL or IZEA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Marvell Technology, Inc.
(MRVL) trades at 41. 7x forward P/E versus 57. 0x for Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd — 15. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CRDO: 15. 3% to $217. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — TZUP or CRDO or MRVL or IZEA?
In this comparison, TZUP (0.
2% yield), MRVL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CRDO, IZEA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TZUP or CRDO or MRVL or IZEA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IZEA Worldwide, Inc.
(IZEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IZEA: -83. 6%, TZUP: -53. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TZUP and CRDO and MRVL and IZEA?
These companies operate in different sectors (TZUP (Communication Services) and CRDO (Technology) and MRVL (Technology) and IZEA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TZUP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CRDO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; IZEA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.