TZUP vs IZEA

For growth investors, IZEA Worldwide, Inc.

(IZEA) is the stronger pick with -12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -63. 8% for Thumzup Media Corporation (TZUP). IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA) offers the better valuation at 1908. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Thumzup Media Corporation (TZUP) delivered a total return of -53.

9%, compared to -66. 6% for IZEA Worldwide, Inc. (IZEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TZUP returned -53. 9% versus IZEA's -84. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IZEA Worldwide, Inc.

(IZEA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Thumzup Media Corporation's 1. 30β — meaning TZUP is approximately 192% more volatile than IZEA relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), IZEA Worldwide, Inc.

(IZEA) is pulling ahead at -12. 9% versus -63. 8% for Thumzup Media Corporation (TZUP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IZEA Worldwide, Inc. grew EPS 100. 2% year-over-year, compared to -6. 4% for Thumzup Media Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, IZEA leads at -8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

IZEA Worldwide, Inc.

(IZEA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -5398. 0% for Thumzup Media Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IZEA leads at -6. 0% versus -5325. 1% for TZUP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TZUP leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, TZUP (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. IZEA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, IZEA Worldwide, Inc.

(IZEA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IZEA: -84. 2%, TZUP: -53. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.