UAMY vs SCCO

For growth investors, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is the stronger pick with 162.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 4% for Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) offers the better valuation at 34. 3x trailing P/E (25. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Southern Copper Corporation is actually cheaper at 25.

4x.

Over the past 5 years, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) delivered a total return of +1161%, compared to +167.

4% for Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UAMY returned +37. 0% versus SCCO's +668. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

78β versus United States Antimony Corporation's 1. 88β — meaning UAMY is approximately 6% more volatile than SCCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is pulling ahead at 162.

8% versus 17. 4% for Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern Copper Corporation grew EPS 24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -150. 0% for United States Antimony Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, UAMY leads at 52. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus -11. 1% for United States Antimony Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus -21. 5% for UAMY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) trades at 25.

4x forward P/E versus 200. 4x for United States Antimony Corporation — 175. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UAMY: 22. 5% to $13. 50.

In this comparison, SCCO (1.

7% yield) pays a dividend. UAMY does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

7% yield, +668. 4% 10Y return). United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCO: +668. 4%, UAMY: +37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

SCCO pays a dividend while UAMY does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.