Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.54B
5Y Perf.+2149.0%
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$148.31B
5Y Perf.+374.2%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$87.11B
5Y Perf.+423.9%
MP
MP Materials Corp.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.28B
5Y Perf.+593.4%

UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
UAMY logoUAMY
SCCO logoSCCO
FCX logoFCX
MP logoMP
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsCopperCopperIndustrial Materials
Market Cap$1.54B$148.31B$87.11B$12.28B
Revenue (TTM)$39M$13.42B$26.42B$305M
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$4.33B$2.73B$-71M
Gross Margin25.2%56.7%27.8%8.3%
Operating Margin-21.5%52.2%27.8%-36.4%
Forward P/E200.4x25.4x22.4x274.3x
Total Debt$185K$7.41B$11.50B$1.04B
Cash & Equiv.$30M$4.30B$3.35B$1.17B

UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

UAMY
SCCO
FCX
MP
StockJun 20May 26Return
United States Antim… (UAMY)1002249.0+2149.0%
Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO)100474.2+374.2%
Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX)100523.9+423.9%
MP Materials Corp. (MP)100693.4+593.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SCCO leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. MP Materials Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. UAMY and FCX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
The Growth Play

UAMY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 162.8%, EPS growth -150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 52.6%
  • 37.0% 10Y total return vs SCCO's 6.7%
  • 162.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
SCCO
Southern Copper Corporation
The Income Pick

SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 1.7%
  • Beta 1.78, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3.89x
  • 32.3% margin vs MP's -23.3%
  • 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
The Value Pick

FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.75 vs SCCO's 1.22
  • Lower P/E (22.4x vs 274.3x)
Best for: valuation efficiency
MP
MP Materials Corp.
The Defensive Pick

MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
  • Beta 1.40 vs UAMY's 1.88
  • +192.7% vs FCX's +65.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUAMY logoUAMY162.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
ValueFCX logoFCXLower P/E (22.4x vs 274.3x)
Quality / MarginsSCCO logoSCCO32.3% margin vs MP's -23.3%
Stability / SafetyMP logoMPBeta 1.40 vs UAMY's 1.88
DividendsSCCO logoSCCO1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MP logoMP+192.7% vs FCX's +65.3%
Efficiency (ROA)SCCO logoSCCO21.4% ROA vs UAMY's -5.4%, ROIC 38.6% vs -10.3%

UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

UAMYUnited States Antimony Corporation
FY 2025
Antimony
90.1%$35M
Zeolite
8.6%$3M
Precious Metals
1.3%$519,902
SCCOSouthern Copper Corporation
FY 2025
Copper
74.8%$10.0B
Molybdenum
10.5%$1.4B
Silver
7.3%$974M
Zinc
3.9%$530M
Other
3.6%$477M
FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc.
FY 2025
Copper Cathode
31.4%$8.1B
Copper In Concentrates
24.3%$6.3B
Refined Copper Products
17.0%$4.4B
Gold
15.0%$3.9B
Molybdenum
7.6%$2.0B
Other Products Or Services
2.9%$749M
Purchased Copper
1.7%$449M
MPMP Materials Corp.
FY 2024
Materials Segment
100.0%$204M

UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSCCOLAGGINGMP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 673.0x UAMY's $39M. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MP's -23.3%. On growth, UAMY holds the edge at +89.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$39M$13.4B$26.4B$305M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M$7.9B$9.6B-$43M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M$4.3B$2.7B-$71M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$37M$3.4B$6.2B-$314M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.2%+56.7%+27.8%+8.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-21.5%+52.2%+27.8%-36.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-11.1%+32.3%+10.3%-23.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-95.5%+25.5%+23.6%-102.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+89.6%+39.0%+12.2%+49.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+54.5%+154.2%+121.4%
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FCX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 34.3x trailing earnings, SCCO trades at a 14% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs SCCO's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
Market CapShares × price$1.5B$148.3B$87.1B$12.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$151.4B$95.3B$12.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-275.50x34.26x39.88x-138.26x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.200.36x25.40x22.41x274.33x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.64x1.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.24x11.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue39.31x11.05x3.38x44.59x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.67x13.55x2.84x4.92x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF43.28x78.05x
FCX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-6 for UAMY. UAMY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs MP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.1%+42.0%+8.9%-3.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.4%+21.4%+4.7%-2.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-10.3%+38.6%+12.8%-4.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-9.7%+39.2%+12.4%-4.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94854
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.67x0.37x0.44x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$30M$3.1B$8.1B-$123M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$30M$4.3B$3.4B$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$185,048$7.4B$11.5B$1.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense19.33x17.68x-2.80x
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

UAMY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in UAMY five years ago would be worth $126,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, MP leads with a +192.7% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UAMY at 2.2% vs FCX's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+85.8%+21.4%+17.3%+25.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+190.8%+110.5%+65.3%+192.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3150.7%+151.0%+70.7%+221.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1161.2%+167.4%+44.3%+149.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3700.0%+668.4%+507.7%+591.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+2.2%+35.9%+19.5%+47.6%
UAMY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FCX and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAMY's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCX currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs UAMY's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.88x1.78x1.79x1.40x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$19.71$223.89$70.97$100.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.94$85.72$35.15$18.64
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.9%+80.2%+85.4%+69.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.554.149.166.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded12.4M1.6M15.4M5.6M
Evenly matched — FCX and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: UAMY as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", FCX as "Buy", MP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for UAMY (target: $14) vs -12.9% for SCCO (target: $156). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs FCX's 0.99%.

MetricUAMY logoUAMYUnited States Ant…SCCO logoSCCOSouthern Copper C…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …MP logoMPMP Materials Corp.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$13.50$156.40$67.00$78.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts4304111
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.96$0.60
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.1%0.0%
Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallSouthern Copper Corporation (SCCO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is the stronger pick with 162.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) offers the better valuation at 34. 3x trailing P/E (25. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?

On trailing P/E, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the cheapest at 34.

3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?

Over the past 5 years, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) delivered a total return of +1161%, compared to +44.

3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UAMY returned +37. 0% versus FCX's +507. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.

(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus United States Antimony Corporation's 1. 88β — meaning UAMY is approximately 34% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is pulling ahead at 162.

8% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern Copper Corporation grew EPS 24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -150. 0% for United States Antimony Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, UAMY leads at 52. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?

Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

3% net margin versus -31. 2% for MP Materials Corp. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) trades at 22. 4x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 251. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UAMY: 22. 5% to $13. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?

In this comparison, SCCO (1.

7% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. UAMY, MP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

7% yield, +668. 4% 10Y return). United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCO: +668. 4%, UAMY: +37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between UAMY and SCCO and FCX and MP?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: UAMY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SCCO, FCX pay a dividend while UAMY, MP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

UAMY

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 44%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SCCO

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FCX

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform UAMY and SCCO and FCX and MP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(UAMY: 89.6% · SCCO: 39.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.