Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Industrial Materials
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Copper | Copper | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $1.54B | $148.31B | $87.11B | $12.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $13.42B | $26.42B | $305M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $4.33B | $2.73B | $-71M |
| Gross Margin | 25.2% | 56.7% | 27.8% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | -21.5% | 52.2% | 27.8% | -36.4% |
| Forward P/E | 200.4x | 25.4x | 22.4x | 274.3x |
| Total Debt | $185K | $7.41B | $11.50B | $1.04B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $4.30B | $3.35B | $1.17B |
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States Antim… (UAMY) | 100 | 2249.0 | +2149.0% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 474.2 | +374.2% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 523.9 | +423.9% |
| MP Materials Corp. (MP) | 100 | 693.4 | +593.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UAMY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 162.8%, EPS growth -150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 52.6%
- 37.0% 10Y total return vs SCCO's 6.7%
- 162.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 1.7%
- Beta 1.78, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3.89x
- 32.3% margin vs MP's -23.3%
- 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.75 vs SCCO's 1.22
- Lower P/E (22.4x vs 274.3x)
MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
- Beta 1.40 vs UAMY's 1.88
- +192.7% vs FCX's +65.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 162.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.4x vs 274.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs MP's -23.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.40 vs UAMY's 1.88 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +192.7% vs FCX's +65.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs UAMY's -5.4%, ROIC 38.6% vs -10.3% |
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
FCX leads 1 • UAMY leads 1 • MP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 673.0x UAMY's $39M. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MP's -23.3%. On growth, UAMY holds the edge at +89.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $13.4B | $26.4B | $305M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $7.9B | $9.6B | -$43M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $4.3B | $2.7B | -$71M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$37M | $3.4B | $6.2B | -$314M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +56.7% | +27.8% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.5% | +52.2% | +27.8% | -36.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.1% | +32.3% | +10.3% | -23.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -95.5% | +25.5% | +23.6% | -102.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.6% | +39.0% | +12.2% | +49.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +54.5% | +154.2% | +121.4% |
Valuation Metrics
FCX leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.3x trailing earnings, SCCO trades at a 14% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs SCCO's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $148.3B | $87.1B | $12.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $151.4B | $95.3B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -275.50x | 34.26x | 39.88x | -138.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 200.36x | 25.40x | 22.41x | 274.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.64x | 1.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.24x | 11.16x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 39.31x | 11.05x | 3.38x | 44.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.67x | 13.55x | 2.84x | 4.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.28x | 78.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-6 for UAMY. UAMY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs MP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.1% | +42.0% | +8.9% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +21.4% | +4.7% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.3% | +38.6% | +12.8% | -4.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.7% | +39.2% | +12.4% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.67x | 0.37x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | $3.1B | $8.1B | -$123M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $4.3B | $3.4B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $185,048 | $7.4B | $11.5B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 19.33x | 17.68x | -2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UAMY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UAMY five years ago would be worth $126,116 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, MP leads with a +192.7% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UAMY at 2.2% vs FCX's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +85.8% | +21.4% | +17.3% | +25.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +190.8% | +110.5% | +65.3% | +192.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3150.7% | +151.0% | +70.7% | +221.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1161.2% | +167.4% | +44.3% | +149.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3700.0% | +668.4% | +507.7% | +591.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.2% | +35.9% | +19.5% | +47.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FCX and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAMY's 1.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCX currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs UAMY's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.78x | 1.79x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.71 | $223.89 | $70.97 | $100.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.94 | $85.72 | $35.15 | $18.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.9% | +80.2% | +85.4% | +69.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 54.1 | 49.1 | 66.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.4M | 1.6M | 15.4M | 5.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SCCO and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UAMY as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", FCX as "Buy", MP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for UAMY (target: $14) vs -12.9% for SCCO (target: $156). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs FCX's 0.99%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.50 | $156.40 | $67.00 | $78.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 30 | 41 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.96 | $0.60 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
SCCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
UAMY vs SCCO vs FCX vs MP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is the stronger pick with 162.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) offers the better valuation at 34. 3x trailing P/E (25. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?
On trailing P/E, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the cheapest at 34.
3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?
Over the past 5 years, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) delivered a total return of +1161%, compared to +44.
3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UAMY returned +37. 0% versus FCX's +507. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus United States Antimony Corporation's 1. 88β — meaning UAMY is approximately 34% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) is pulling ahead at 162.
8% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern Copper Corporation grew EPS 24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -150. 0% for United States Antimony Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, UAMY leads at 52. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus -31. 2% for MP Materials Corp. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) trades at 22. 4x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 251. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UAMY: 22. 5% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP?
In this comparison, SCCO (1.
7% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. UAMY, MP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UAMY or SCCO or FCX or MP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
7% yield, +668. 4% 10Y return). United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCCO: +668. 4%, UAMY: +37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UAMY and SCCO and FCX and MP?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UAMY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SCCO, FCX pay a dividend while UAMY, MP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.