Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UAVS vs JOBY vs AVAV vs ACHR vs AXON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
UAVS vs JOBY vs AVAV vs ACHR vs AXON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $1M | $9.83B | $8.40B | $4.67B | $34.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $78M | $1.61B | $300K | $2.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $-957M | $-224M | $-618M | $206M |
| Gross Margin | 50.5% | 11.2% | 21.8% | — | 59.3% |
| Operating Margin | -95.5% | -10.2% | -8.3% | -2431.0% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 58.4x | — | 55.0x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $61M | $64M | $42M | $1.91B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $241M | $41M | $1.02B | $1.20B |
UAVS vs JOBY vs AVAV vs ACHR vs AXON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AgEagle Aerial Syst… (UAVS) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 86.5 | -13.5% |
| AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) | 100 | 193.5 | +93.5% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 62.4 | -37.6% |
| Axon Enterprise, In… (AXON) | 100 | 348.4 | +248.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UAVS vs JOBY vs AVAV vs ACHR vs AXON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UAVS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 17.5% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
JOBY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.70, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 24.09x
- Beta 2.70, current ratio 24.09x
- 391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8%
- +55.7% vs AXON's -29.1%
AVAV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ACHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AXON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.19
- Rev growth 33.5%, EPS growth -68.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.7%
- 22.0% 10Y total return vs AVAV's 498.3%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.19 vs UAVS's 3.30 | |
| Dividends | 17.5% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.7% vs AXON's -29.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs UAVS's -56.3%, ROIC -1.3% vs -135.0% |
UAVS vs JOBY vs AVAV vs ACHR vs AXON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UAVS vs JOBY vs AVAV vs ACHR vs AXON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AXON leads in 3 of 6 categories
UAVS leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • AVAV leads 0 • ACHR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXON is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 9944.2x ACHR's $300,000. AXON is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%. On growth, AVAV holds the edge at +143.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $78M | $1.6B | $300,000 | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$759M | $82M | -$709M | $97M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | -$957M | -$224M | -$618M | $206M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$661M | -$183M | -$512M | $20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +11.2% | +21.8% | — | +59.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -95.5% | -10.2% | -8.3% | -2431.0% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -153.6% | -12.3% | -13.9% | -2060.7% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -78.4% | -8.5% | -11.3% | -1705.7% | +0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.0% | — | +143.4% | — | +33.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +99.4% | -9.1% | -51.5% | +43.5% | +89.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UAVS and JOBY and AVAV and ACHR and AXON each lead in 1 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 108.5x trailing earnings, AVAV trades at a 62% valuation discount to AXON's 282.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AVAV's 103.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AXON's 1664.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $9.8B | $8.4B | $4.7B | $34.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $9.6B | $8.4B | $3.7B | $35.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -8.85x | 108.50x | -6.34x | 282.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 58.41x | — | 54.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 102.96x | — | 1664.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 183.94x | 10.23x | 9999.00x | 12.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.86x | 5.34x | 1.78x | 13.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 458.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AXON leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AXON delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-74 for JOBY. ACHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AXON's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UAVS scores 6/9 vs AVAV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -68.5% | -74.2% | -6.4% | -37.8% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -56.3% | -52.1% | -5.0% | -32.9% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -135.0% | -54.7% | +3.6% | -89.6% | -1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -94.2% | -49.8% | +4.5% | -44.3% | -1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.07x | 0.02x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $898,841 | -$180M | $23M | -$979M | $709M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $241M | $41M | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $61M | $64M | $42M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.14x | — | -5.99x | — | 1.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ACHR and AXON each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXON five years ago would be worth $31,683 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for UAVS. Over the past 12 months, JOBY leads with a +55.7% total return vs AXON's -29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACHR at 43.2% vs UAVS's -85.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | -30.4% | -34.4% | -22.8% | -24.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.7% | +55.7% | +5.1% | -26.6% | -29.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +128.7% | +63.1% | +193.5% | +92.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +1.0% | +53.7% | -36.3% | +216.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -4.8% | +498.3% | -37.0% | +2200.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -85.5% | +31.8% | +17.7% | +43.2% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AXON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AXON is the less volatile stock with a 1.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UAVS's 3.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AXON currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs UAVS's 32.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.30x | 2.70x | 1.57x | 2.96x | 1.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.61 | $20.95 | $417.86 | $14.62 | $885.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $6.32 | $155.69 | $4.80 | $339.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.4% | +47.7% | +40.2% | +43.0% | +48.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 65.5 | 39.8 | 61.5 | 40.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 24.7M | 1.7M | 27.6M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOBY as "Hold", AVAV as "Buy", ACHR as "Buy", AXON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.3% upside for AVAV (target: $344) vs 59.1% for JOBY (target: $16). UAVS is the only dividend payer here at 17.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.90 | $343.60 | $12.33 | $726.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 28 | 9 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +17.5% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AXON leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
UAVS vs JOBY vs AVAV vs ACHR vs AXON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UAVS or JOBY or AVAV or ACHR or AXON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS). AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) offers the better valuation at 108. 5x trailing P/E (58. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UAVS or JOBY or AVAV or ACHR or AXON?
On trailing P/E, AeroVironment, Inc.
(AVAV) is the cheapest at 108. 5x versus Axon Enterprise, Inc. at 282. 7x. On forward P/E, Axon Enterprise, Inc. is actually cheaper at 55. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UAVS or JOBY or AVAV or ACHR or AXON?
Over the past 5 years, Axon Enterprise, Inc.
(AXON) delivered a total return of +216. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXON returned +22. 0% versus UAVS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UAVS or JOBY or AVAV or ACHR or AXON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Axon Enterprise, Inc.
(AXON) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 19β versus AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. 's 3. 30β — meaning UAVS is approximately 177% more volatile than AXON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 59% for Axon Enterprise, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UAVS or JOBY or AVAV or ACHR or AXON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus -2. 5% for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Archer Aviation Inc. grew EPS 30. 3% year-over-year, compared to -475. 1% for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXON leads at 32. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UAVS or JOBY or AVAV or ACHR or AXON?
AeroVironment, Inc.
(AVAV) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVAV leads at 5. 0% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXON leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UAVS or JOBY or AVAV or ACHR or AXON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Axon Enterprise, Inc.
(AXON) trades at 55. 0x forward P/E versus 58. 4x for AeroVironment, Inc. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVAV: 104. 3% to $343. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — UAVS or JOBY or AVAV or ACHR or AXON?
In this comparison, UAVS (17.
5% yield) pays a dividend. JOBY, AVAV, ACHR, AXON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UAVS or JOBY or AVAV or ACHR or AXON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Axon Enterprise, Inc.
(AXON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19)). Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AXON: +22. 0%, ACHR: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UAVS and JOBY and AVAV and ACHR and AXON?
These companies operate in different sectors (UAVS (Technology) and JOBY (Industrials) and AVAV (Industrials) and ACHR (Industrials) and AXON (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UAVS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVAV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AXON is a mid-cap high-growth stock. UAVS pays a dividend while JOBY, AVAV, ACHR, AXON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.