Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UCB vs CBSH vs UMBF vs BOKF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
UCB vs CBSH vs UMBF vs BOKF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.02B | $7.71B | $9.99B | $10.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.54B | $2.14B | $4.44B | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $328M | $566M | $883M | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 66.0% | 80.0% | 54.4% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.5% | 34.2% | 20.3% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 11.2x | 13.0x | 10.3x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $205M | $3.00B | $3.80B | $4.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $203M | $803M | $953M | $1.43B |
UCB vs CBSH vs UMBF vs BOKF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Community Ba… (UCB) | 100 | 171.7 | +71.7% |
| Commerce Bancshares… (CBSH) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| UMB Financial Corpo… (UMBF) | 100 | 255.8 | +155.8% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 262.0 | +162.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UCB vs CBSH vs UMBF vs BOKF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UCB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 5.6%, current ratio 0.17x
- Beta 1.02, yield 2.9%, current ratio 0.17x
- 2.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs UMBF's 1.4%
CBSH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.1%
- Beta 0.70 vs UMBF's 1.19
UMBF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 68.5%, EPS growth 1.6%
- PEG 1.14 vs BOKF's 4.38
- NIM 3.5% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 168.5% 10Y total return vs UMBF's 165.1%
- +44.8% vs CBSH's -13.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.5% NII/revenue growth vs CBSH's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 13.0x), PEG 1.14 vs 1.15 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs UMBF's 1.19 | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs UMBF's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs CBSH's -13.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CBSH's 0.5% |
UCB vs CBSH vs UMBF vs BOKF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UCB vs CBSH vs UMBF vs BOKF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CBSH leads in 1 of 6 categories
UCB leads 1 • UMBF leads 0 • BOKF leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBSH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UMBF is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 2.9x UCB's $1.5B. CBSH is the more profitable business, keeping 26.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $2.1B | $4.4B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $457M | $796M | $1.1B | $797M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $328M | $566M | $883M | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $408M | $570M | $985M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.0% | +80.0% | +54.4% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.5% | +34.2% | +20.3% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +26.5% | +15.8% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.5% | +27.7% | +22.0% | +42.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.4% | +1.0% | +176.9% | +1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
UCB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, UCB trades at a 22% valuation discount to BOKF's 16.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CBSH offers better value at 1.14x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.0B | $7.7B | $10.0B | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $9.9B | $12.8B | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.81x | 12.86x | 14.37x | 16.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.22x | 13.01x | 10.31x | 13.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.96x | 1.14x | 1.59x | 5.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.80x | 12.87x | 12.11x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.61x | 3.60x | 2.25x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.12x | 1.91x | 1.30x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.85x | 13.01x | 10.21x | 7.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — UCB and CBSH each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBSH delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. UCB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UCB scores 7/9 vs BOKF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +15.3% | +11.7% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.7% | +1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | +8.4% | +7.5% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.3% | +2.3% | +14.4% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.79x | 0.49x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | $2.2B | $2.8B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $203M | $803M | $953M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $205M | $3.0B | $3.8B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.89x | 1.97x | 0.63x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — UMBF and BOKF each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $15,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,711 for CBSH. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs CBSH's -13.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UMBF at 34.6% vs CBSH's 6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | +1.0% | +13.0% | +13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.3% | -13.9% | +31.1% | +44.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.2% | +20.2% | +143.7% | +79.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.7% | -12.9% | +41.5% | +59.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.0% | +103.4% | +165.1% | +168.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.9% | +6.3% | +34.6% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CBSH and UMBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CBSH is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UMBF's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UMBF currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs CBSH's 79.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 0.70x | 1.19x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $36.77 | $66.35 | $136.11 | $139.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.23 | $46.99 | $98.16 | $91.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.3% | +79.1% | +96.4% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 61.7 | 78.4 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 825K | 1.2M | 613K | 317K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UCB and UMBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UCB as "Hold", CBSH as "Hold", UMBF as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.7% upside for UCB (target: $40) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, UCB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.90% vs UMBF's 1.35%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $39.50 | $58.50 | $150.40 | $131.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 15 | 18 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +2.1% | +1.4% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 9 | 12 | 17 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | $1.08 | $1.77 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | +2.7% | +1.3% | +0.9% |
CBSH leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). UCB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 4 tied.
UCB vs CBSH vs UMBF vs BOKF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UCB or CBSH or UMBF or BOKF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is the stronger pick with 68.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). United Community Banks, Inc. (UCB) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UCB or CBSH or UMBF or BOKF?
On trailing P/E, United Community Banks, Inc.
(UCB) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus BOK Financial Corporation at 16. 4x. On forward P/E, UMB Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: UMB Financial Corporation wins at 1. 14x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UCB or CBSH or UMBF or BOKF?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +59.
4%, compared to -12. 9% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +168. 5% versus CBSH's +103. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UCB or CBSH or UMBF or BOKF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus UMB Financial Corporation's 1. 19β — meaning UMBF is approximately 69% more volatile than CBSH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United Community Banks, Inc. (UCB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UCB or CBSH or UMBF or BOKF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is pulling ahead at 68.
5% versus 2. 2% for Commerce Bancshares, Inc. (CBSH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Community Banks, Inc. grew EPS 28. 4% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UCB or CBSH or UMBF or BOKF?
Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 5% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 26. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CBSH leads at 34. 2% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CBSH leads at 80. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UCB or CBSH or UMBF or BOKF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 14x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for BOK Financial Corporation — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UCB: 17. 7% to $39. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — UCB or CBSH or UMBF or BOKF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
United Community Banks, Inc. (UCB) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 1. 4% for UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF).
09Is UCB or CBSH or UMBF or BOKF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Commerce Bancshares, Inc.
(CBSH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 2. 1% yield, +103. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CBSH: +103. 4%, UMBF: +165. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UCB and CBSH and UMBF and BOKF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CBSH is a small-cap deep-value stock; UMBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.