UCFIW
CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap—
5Y Perf.+5.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
UCFIW vs BRCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BRCC
BRC Inc.
Packaged Foods
Market Cap$146M
5Y Perf.-33.8%
UCFIW vs BRCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | UCFIW | BRCC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | — | $146M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11M | $418M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 66.5% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | 48.8% | -4.3% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $30M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $4M |
Quick Verdict: UCFIW vs BRCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: UCFIW leads in 3 of 4 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
UCFIW
CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
The Banking Pick
UCFIW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 27.8% 10Y total return vs BRCC's -87.3%
- 35.2% margin vs BRCC's -2.2%
- +27.8% vs BRCC's -18.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
BRCC
BRC Inc.
The Defensive Pick
BRCC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 43.7%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.73, current ratio 1.32x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Quality / Margins | UCFIW | 35.2% margin vs BRCC's -2.2% |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | UCFIW | +27.8% vs BRCC's -18.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | UCFIW | 7.9% ROA vs BRCC's -4.1%, ROIC 38.4% vs -15.8% |
UCFIW vs BRCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
UCFIW vs BRCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLUCFIWLAGGINGBRCC
BRCCBRC Inc.
1leads
UCFIWCN Healthy Food Tech …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BRCCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
UCFIW4/4
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
—
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
UCFIW7/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
UCFIW5/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
BRCC1/1
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UCFIW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BRCC is the larger business by revenue, generating $418M annually — 36.8x UCFIW's $11M. UCFIW is the more profitable business, keeping 35.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRCC's -2.2%.
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | BRCCBRC Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $418M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.5% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.8% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +21.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +101.1% |
UCFIW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | BRCCBRC Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $146M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $171M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -9.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCFIW leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCFIW delivers a 37.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-15 for BRCC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UCFIW scores 7/9 vs BRCC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | BRCCBRC Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +37.0% | -14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | -4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +38.4% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +51.3% | -17.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$41M | $25M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $30M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.80x |
UCFIW leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UCFIW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UCFIW five years ago would be worth $12,784 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,270 for BRCC. Over the past 12 months, UCFIW leads with a +27.8% total return vs BRCC's -18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UCFIW at 8.5% vs BRCC's -39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | BRCCBRC Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +11.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.8% | -18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -77.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -87.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -87.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | -39.1% |
UCFIW leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRCC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Risk & Volatility
BRCC currently trades 59.5% from its 52-week high vs UCFIW's 56.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | BRCCBRC Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.16 | $2.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.06 | $0.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.3% | +59.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | — | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 148K | 774K |
BRCC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | UCFIWCN Healthy Food T… | BRCCBRC Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
UCFIW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BRCC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallCN Healthy Food Tech Group … (UCFIW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
UCFIW vs BRCC: Frequently Asked Questions
6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UCFIW or BRCC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate BRC Inc.
(BRCC) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UCFIW or BRCC?
Over the past 5 years, CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
(UCFIW) delivered a total return of +27. 8%, compared to -87. 3% for BRC Inc. (BRCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UCFIW returned +27. 8% versus BRCC's -87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which has better profit margins — UCFIW or BRCC?
CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
(UCFIW) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 2% net margin versus -3. 0% for BRC Inc. — meaning it keeps 35. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UCFIW leads at 48. 8% versus -6. 2% for BRCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UCFIW leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
04Which pays a better dividend — UCFIW or BRCC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
05Is UCFIW or BRCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BRC Inc.
(BRCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BRCC: -87. 3%, UCFIW: +27. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
06What are the main differences between UCFIW and BRCC?
These companies operate in different sectors (UCFIW (Financial Services) and BRCC (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Closest Rival
Compare BRCC vs CBRL
CBRL is one of the most direct listed alternatives to BRCC.
Closest Rival
Compare UCFIW vs GFAI
GFAI is one of the most direct listed alternatives to UCFIW.
Expand Peer Set
Expand With SMPL + NOMD
SMPL and NOMD are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.