Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

UCFIW vs SFM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
UCFIW
CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap
5Y Perf.+5.0%
SFM
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.

Grocery Stores

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.62B
5Y Perf.+25.7%

UCFIW vs SFM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
UCFIW logoUCFIW
SFM logoSFM
IndustryFinancial - Capital MarketsGrocery Stores
Market Cap$7.62B
Revenue (TTM)$11M$8.90B
Net Income (TTM)$4M$507M
Gross Margin66.5%37.0%
Operating Margin48.8%7.6%
Forward P/E14.5x
Total Debt$0.00$1.94B
Cash & Equiv.$41M$257M

Quick Verdict: UCFIW vs SFM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UCFIW leads in 2 of 4 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
UCFIW
CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.
The Banking Pick

UCFIW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • current ratio 1.10x
  • 35.2% margin vs SFM's 5.7%
  • +27.8% vs SFM's -51.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
SFM
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

SFM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 203.9% 10Y total return vs UCFIW's 27.8%
  • 12.5% ROA vs UCFIW's 7.9%, ROIC 17.8% vs 38.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
Quality / MarginsUCFIW logoUCFIW35.2% margin vs SFM's 5.7%
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)UCFIW logoUCFIW+27.8% vs SFM's -51.7%
Efficiency (ROA)SFM logoSFM12.5% ROA vs UCFIW's 7.9%, ROIC 17.8% vs 38.4%

UCFIW vs SFM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

UCFIWCN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

SFMSprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
FY 2025
Perishables
57.0%$5.0B
Non Perishables
43.0%$3.8B

UCFIW vs SFM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUCFIWLAGGINGSFM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UCFIW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

SFM is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 784.3x UCFIW's $11M. UCFIW is the more profitable business, keeping 35.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFM's 5.7%.

MetricUCFIW logoUCFIWCN Healthy Food T…SFM logoSFMSprouts Farmers M…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$11M$8.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$996M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$507M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$361M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+66.5%+37.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+48.8%+7.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+35.2%+5.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.7%+4.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.5%
UCFIW leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricUCFIW logoUCFIWCN Healthy Food T…SFM logoSFMSprouts Farmers M…
Market CapShares × price$7.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.25x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.90x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.35x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.86x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.70x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.29x
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Profitability & Efficiency

UCFIW leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

UCFIW delivers a 37.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $36 for SFM. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UCFIW scores 7/9 vs SFM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUCFIW logoUCFIWCN Healthy Food T…SFM logoSFMSprouts Farmers M…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+37.0%+36.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.9%+12.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+38.4%+17.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+51.3%+22.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.39x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$41M$1.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$41M$257M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense254.65x
UCFIW leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $31,381 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,784 for UCFIW. Over the past 12 months, UCFIW leads with a +27.8% total return vs SFM's -51.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SFM at 31.2% vs UCFIW's 8.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUCFIW logoUCFIWCN Healthy Food T…SFM logoSFMSprouts Farmers M…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.8%-51.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+27.8%+125.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+27.8%+213.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+27.8%+203.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.5%+31.2%
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

UCFIW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

UCFIW currently trades 56.3% from its 52-week high vs SFM's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUCFIW logoUCFIWCN Healthy Food T…SFM logoSFMSprouts Farmers M…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.16$182.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.06$64.75
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+56.3%+44.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded148K2.2M
UCFIW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
MetricUCFIW logoUCFIWCN Healthy Food T…SFM logoSFMSprouts Farmers M…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$91.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts43
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+6.2%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

UCFIW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFM leads in 1 (Total Returns).

Best OverallCN Healthy Food Tech Group … (UCFIW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

UCFIW vs SFM: Frequently Asked Questions

6 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is UCFIW or SFM a better buy right now?

Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.

(SFM) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — UCFIW or SFM?

Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.

(SFM) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to +27. 8% for CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp. (UCFIW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFM returned +203. 9% versus UCFIW's +27. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which has better profit margins — UCFIW or SFM?

CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.

(UCFIW) is the more profitable company, earning 35. 2% net margin versus 5. 9% for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. — meaning it keeps 35. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UCFIW leads at 48. 8% versus 7. 8% for SFM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UCFIW leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

04

Which pays a better dividend — UCFIW or SFM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

05

Is UCFIW or SFM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.

(SFM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17), +203. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SFM: +203. 9%, UCFIW: +27. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

06

What are the main differences between UCFIW and SFM?

These companies operate in different sectors (UCFIW (Financial Services) and SFM (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UCFIW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

UCFIW

High-Margin Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SFM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform UCFIW and SFM on the metrics below

Net Margin>
%
(UCFIW: 35.2% · SFM: 5.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.