Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UCL vs SHEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
UCL vs SHEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $43M | $898M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $85M | $266M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-36M |
| Gross Margin | 49.8% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.5% | -10.3% |
| Forward P/E | 104.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $10M | $642M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $27M |
UCL vs SHEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| uCloudlink Group In… (UCL) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 32.9 | -67.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UCL vs SHEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.61
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 45.8%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 0.61, current ratio 1.32x
SHEN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth -120.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
- 21.6% 10Y total return vs UCL's -93.4%
- 9.1% revenue growth vs UCL's 7.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.1% revenue growth vs UCL's 7.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.2% margin vs SHEN's -13.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs SHEN's 0.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.3% vs UCL's -2.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs SHEN's -2.0%, ROIC 363.4% vs -1.1% |
UCL vs SHEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UCL vs SHEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UCL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $266M annually — 3.1x UCL's $85M. UCL is the more profitable business, keeping 9.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SHEN's -13.7%. On growth, UCL holds the edge at -16.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $85M | $266M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $236,000 | $104M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.8% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -10.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | -13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | -103.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -16.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UCL and SHEN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, UCL's 3.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHEN's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $43M | $898M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.95x | -22.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 104.59x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.02x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.39x | 13.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 2.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.27x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UCL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UCL delivers a 32.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SHEN. UCL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.46x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHEN's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UCL scores 5/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.4% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.8% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $614M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $642M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.37x | -0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHEN five years ago would be worth $7,209 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,065 for UCL. Over the past 12 months, SHEN leads with a +41.3% total return vs UCL's -2.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHEN at -4.8% vs UCL's -35.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.3% | +43.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.6% | +41.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.9% | -13.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.3% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.4% | +21.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.3% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UCL and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UCL is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHEN's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs UCL's 27.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $17.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.10 | $9.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.2% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.1 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 300K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
SHEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
UCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SHEN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
UCL vs SHEN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UCL or SHEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger pick with 9.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 1% for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL). uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) offers the better valuation at 0. 9x trailing P/E (104. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UCL or SHEN?
Over the past 5 years, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) delivered a total return of -27.
9%, compared to -89. 3% for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHEN returned +21. 6% versus UCL's -93. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UCL or SHEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 61β versus Shenandoah Telecommunications Company's 0. 89β — meaning SHEN is approximately 44% more volatile than UCL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 66% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — UCL or SHEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is pulling ahead at 9.
1% versus 7. 1% for uCloudlink Group Inc. (UCL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: uCloudlink Group Inc. grew EPS 1479% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UCL or SHEN?
uCloudlink Group Inc.
(UCL) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -11. 0% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UCL leads at 4. 8% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UCL leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UCL or SHEN?
In this comparison, SHEN (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. UCL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is UCL or SHEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEN: +21. 6%, UCL: -93. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UCL and SHEN?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UCL is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHEN pays a dividend while UCL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.