REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UE vs REG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
UE vs REG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.78B | $14.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $486M | $1.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $108M | $630M |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | 60.5% |
| Operating Margin | 29.0% | 54.0% |
| Forward P/E | 47.5x | 32.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.67B | $5.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $121M |
UE vs REG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urban Edge Properti… (UE) | 100 | 226.0 | +126.0% |
| Regency Centers Cor… (REG) | 100 | 182.0 | +82.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UE vs REG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.1%, EPS growth 23.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.8%
- 6.1% FFO/revenue growth vs REG's 3.4%
- +23.9% vs REG's +12.2%
REG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.36, yield 3.6%
- 28.9% 10Y total return vs UE's 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.36, Low D/E 82.7%, current ratio 1.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.1% FFO/revenue growth vs REG's 3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (32.1x vs 47.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.4% margin vs UE's 22.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.36 vs UE's 0.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs UE's 3.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.9% vs REG's +12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs UE's 3.2%, ROIC 3.5% vs 3.2% |
UE vs REG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UE vs REG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 3.5x UE's $486M. REG is the more profitable business, keeping 37.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UE's 22.2%. On growth, REG holds the edge at +31.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $486M | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $276M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $108M | $630M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $189M | $700M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +60.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +54.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | +37.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.9% | +41.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.2% | +31.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +157.1% | +2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — UE and REG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.6x trailing earnings, REG trades at a 7% valuation discount to UE's 29.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UE's 16.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REG's 20.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $14.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.4B | $20.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.78x | 27.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 47.53x | 32.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.55x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.88x | 9.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.02x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.20x | 36.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REG delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $8 for UE. REG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.83x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UE's 1.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UE scores 8/9 vs REG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.8% | +9.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.2% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.21x | 0.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $5.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $121M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.28x | 2.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in REG five years ago would be worth $13,947 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,175 for UE. Over the past 12 months, UE leads with a +23.9% total return vs REG's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UE at 18.6% vs REG's 13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.5% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.9% | +12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.7% | +44.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.8% | +39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | +28.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UE and REG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REG is the less volatile stock with a 0.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UE's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UE currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs REG's 95.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 0.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.26 | $81.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.46 | $66.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +95.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 891K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
REG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates UE as "Hold" and REG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.9% upside for REG (target: $80) vs -4.7% for UE (target: $21). For income investors, REG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.61% vs UE's 3.44%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $80.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.76 | $2.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.1% |
REG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
UE vs REG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UE or REG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Urban Edge Properties (UE) is the stronger pick with 6.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Regency Centers Corporation (REG) offers the better valuation at 27. 6x trailing P/E (32. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Regency Centers Corporation (REG) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UE or REG?
On trailing P/E, Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is the cheapest at 27.
6x versus Urban Edge Properties at 29. 8x. On forward P/E, Regency Centers Corporation is actually cheaper at 32. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UE or REG?
Over the past 5 years, Regency Centers Corporation (REG) delivered a total return of +39.
5%, compared to +31. 8% for Urban Edge Properties (UE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REG returned +28. 9% versus UE's +6. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UE or REG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
36β versus Urban Edge Properties's 0. 48β — meaning UE is approximately 33% more volatile than REG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Regency Centers Corporation (REG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 83% versus 121% for Urban Edge Properties — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UE or REG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Urban Edge Properties (UE) is pulling ahead at 6.
1% versus 3. 4% for Regency Centers Corporation (REG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Regency Centers Corporation grew EPS 33. 6% year-over-year, compared to 23. 3% for Urban Edge Properties. Over a 3-year CAGR, REG leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UE or REG?
Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
9% net margin versus 19. 8% for Urban Edge Properties — meaning it keeps 33. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REG leads at 37. 0% versus 26. 8% for UE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REG leads at 44. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UE or REG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Regency Centers Corporation (REG) trades at 32.
1x forward P/E versus 47. 5x for Urban Edge Properties — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REG: 2. 9% to $80. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — UE or REG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Regency Centers Corporation (REG) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 3. 4% for Urban Edge Properties (UE).
09Is UE or REG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
36), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (REG: +28. 9%, UE: +6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UE and REG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.