Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

UG vs CBT vs IOSP vs HWKN vs BCPC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
UG
United-Guardian, Inc.

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$32M
5Y Perf.-56.4%
CBT
Cabot Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.24B
5Y Perf.+139.9%
IOSP
Innospec Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.91B
5Y Perf.+4.5%
HWKN
Hawkins, Inc.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.46B
5Y Perf.+679.3%
BCPC
Balchem Corporation

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.11B
5Y Perf.+59.9%

UG vs CBT vs IOSP vs HWKN vs BCPC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
UG logoUG
CBT logoCBT
IOSP logoIOSP
HWKN logoHWKN
BCPC logoBCPC
IndustryHousehold & Personal ProductsChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$32M$4.24B$1.91B$3.46B$5.11B
Revenue (TTM)$11M$3.58B$1.78B$1.06B$1.06B
Net Income (TTM)$2M$285M$117M$82M$158M
Gross Margin47.7%24.8%27.7%22.9%36.3%
Operating Margin21.3%15.7%8.7%11.5%21.0%
Forward P/E15.2x13.7x16.2x42.4x30.7x
Total Debt$0.00$1.22B$90M$160M$192M
Cash & Equiv.$1M$258M$293M$5M$75M

UG vs CBT vs IOSP vs HWKN vs BCPCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

UG
CBT
IOSP
HWKN
BCPC
StockMay 20May 26Return
United-Guardian, In… (UG)10043.6-56.4%
Cabot Corporation (CBT)100239.9+139.9%
Innospec Inc. (IOSP)100104.5+4.5%
Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN)100779.3+679.3%
Balchem Corporation (BCPC)100159.9+59.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: UG vs CBT vs IOSP vs HWKN vs BCPC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: UG leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Balchem Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. CBT and HWKN also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
UG
United-Guardian, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

UG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.

  • Beta 0.33, yield 8.6%, current ratio 7.31x
  • 20.0% margin vs IOSP's 6.6%
  • 8.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs IOSP's 2.2%
  • 16.3% ROA vs IOSP's 6.5%, ROIC 16.8% vs 11.2%
Best for: defensive
CBT
Cabot Corporation
The Value Play

CBT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (13.7x vs 30.7x)
Best for: value
IOSP
Innospec Inc.
The Income Pick

IOSP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 2.2%
  • PEG 0.51 vs BCPC's 2.40
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
HWKN
Hawkins, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

HWKN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 7.7% 10Y total return vs BCPC's 160.5%
  • +40.6% vs IOSP's -14.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
BCPC
Balchem Corporation
The Growth Play

BCPC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 20.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 15.3%, current ratio 2.07x
  • 8.8% revenue growth vs UG's -13.4%
  • Beta 0.33 vs HWKN's 0.98, lower leverage
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBCPC logoBCPC8.8% revenue growth vs UG's -13.4%
ValueCBT logoCBTLower P/E (13.7x vs 30.7x)
Quality / MarginsUG logoUG20.0% margin vs IOSP's 6.6%
Stability / SafetyBCPC logoBCPCBeta 0.33 vs HWKN's 0.98, lower leverage
DividendsUG logoUG8.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs IOSP's 2.2%
Momentum (1Y)HWKN logoHWKN+40.6% vs IOSP's -14.9%
Efficiency (ROA)UG logoUG16.3% ROA vs IOSP's 6.5%, ROIC 16.8% vs 11.2%

UG vs CBT vs IOSP vs HWKN vs BCPC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

UGUnited-Guardian, Inc.
FY 2016
Personal Care
44.1%$5M
Pharmaceuticals
30.9%$3M
Medical
23.6%$3M
Industrial And Other
1.4%$159,945
CBTCabot Corporation
FY 2025
Reinforcement Materials
65.2%$2.3B
Performance Chemicals
34.8%$1.3B
IOSPInnospec Inc.
FY 2025
Fuel Specialties
39.5%$702M
Performance Chemicals
38.3%$681M
Oilfield Services
22.2%$395M
HWKNHawkins, Inc.
FY 2025
Bulk
88.0%$96M
Other
12.0%$13M
BCPCBalchem Corporation
FY 2025
Product Sales
99.8%$1.0B
Royalty
0.2%$2M

UG vs CBT vs IOSP vs HWKN vs BCPC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUGLAGGINGBCPC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

CBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 339.0x UG's $11M. UG is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IOSP's 6.6%. On growth, UG holds the edge at +19.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricUG logoUGUnited-Guardian, …CBT logoCBTCabot CorporationIOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$11M$3.6B$1.8B$1.1B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M$731M$198M$172M$267M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M$285M$117M$82M$158M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M$459M$88M$88M$182M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+47.7%+24.8%+27.7%+22.9%+36.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.3%+15.7%+8.7%+11.5%+21.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.0%+8.0%+6.6%+7.8%+15.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.1%+12.8%+4.9%+8.2%+17.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+19.6%-3.4%-2.4%+7.9%+8.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+27.3%-23.1%+167.7%-4.2%+10.6%
UG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CBT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 13.5x trailing earnings, CBT trades at a 67% valuation discount to HWKN's 41.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IOSP offers better value at 0.51x vs BCPC's 2.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricUG logoUGUnited-Guardian, …CBT logoCBTCabot CorporationIOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
Market CapShares × price$32M$4.2B$1.9B$3.5B$5.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$31M$5.2B$1.7B$3.6B$5.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS15.22x13.50x16.41x41.44x33.58x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.71x16.24x42.35x30.74x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.51x1.67x2.62x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.14x6.71x8.29x22.74x19.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.05x1.14x1.07x3.55x4.92x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.86x2.58x1.44x7.60x4.14x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.86x10.86x21.68x49.48x29.51x
CBT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UG leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

UG delivers a 19.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $9 for IOSP. IOSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBT's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BCPC scores 9/9 vs UG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUG logoUGUnited-Guardian, …CBT logoCBTCabot CorporationIOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.1%+16.8%+9.0%+15.9%+12.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+16.3%+7.4%+6.5%+8.4%+9.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.8%+17.4%+11.2%+15.9%+12.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+18.9%+21.3%+11.0%+19.3%+14.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–946669
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.71x0.07x0.35x0.15x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M$957M-$203M$155M$117M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$258M$293M$5M$75M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$1.2B$90M$160M$192M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense14.72x10.27x15.23x
UG leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HWKN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HWKN five years ago would be worth $49,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,000 for UG. Over the past 12 months, HWKN leads with a +40.6% total return vs IOSP's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWKN at 61.2% vs IOSP's -6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUG logoUGUnited-Guardian, …CBT logoCBTCabot CorporationIOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+18.3%+21.9%+0.5%+15.1%+3.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-6.0%+13.8%-14.9%+40.6%-2.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-15.4%+22.5%-17.3%+318.9%+26.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.0%+43.2%-18.3%+391.1%+24.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-12.1%+115.7%+84.4%+765.9%+160.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-5.4%+7.0%-6.1%+61.2%+8.2%
HWKN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — UG and CBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BCPC is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HWKN's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CBT currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs UG's 70.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricUG logoUGUnited-Guardian, …CBT logoCBTCabot CorporationIOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.25x0.82x0.71x0.94x0.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.88$84.60$95.55$186.15$183.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.58$58.33$65.58$115.35$139.17
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.9%+96.1%+80.2%+89.7%+86.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.271.759.162.932.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4K374K221K169K190K
Evenly matched — UG and CBT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — UG and IOSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CBT as "Buy", IOSP as "Hold", HWKN as "Buy", BCPC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.1% upside for IOSP (target: $115) vs 0.9% for CBT (target: $82). For income investors, UG offers the higher dividend yield at 8.60% vs HWKN's 0.42%.

MetricUG logoUGUnited-Guardian, …CBT logoCBTCabot CorporationIOSP logoIOSPInnospec Inc.HWKN logoHWKNHawkins, Inc.BCPC logoBCPCBalchem Corporati…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$82.00$115.00$162.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts159110
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+8.6%+2.2%+2.2%+0.4%+0.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2412511
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.60$1.77$1.70$0.70$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.0%0.0%+0.7%+2.1%
Evenly matched — UG and IOSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

UG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CBT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallUnited-Guardian, Inc. (UG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

UG vs CBT vs IOSP vs HWKN vs BCPC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is UG or CBT or IOSP or HWKN or BCPC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is the stronger pick with 8.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 4% for United-Guardian, Inc. (UG). Cabot Corporation (CBT) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cabot Corporation (CBT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — UG or CBT or IOSP or HWKN or BCPC?

On trailing P/E, Cabot Corporation (CBT) is the cheapest at 13.

5x versus Hawkins, Inc. at 41. 4x. On forward P/E, Cabot Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Innospec Inc. wins at 0. 51x versus Balchem Corporation's 2. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — UG or CBT or IOSP or HWKN or BCPC?

Over the past 5 years, Hawkins, Inc.

(HWKN) delivered a total return of +391. 1%, compared to -30. 0% for United-Guardian, Inc. (UG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWKN returned +766. 7% versus UG's -12. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — UG or CBT or IOSP or HWKN or BCPC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United-Guardian, Inc.

(UG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Hawkins, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning HWKN is approximately 275% more volatile than UG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 71% for Cabot Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — UG or CBT or IOSP or HWKN or BCPC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is pulling ahead at 8.

8% versus -13. 4% for United-Guardian, Inc. (UG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innospec Inc. grew EPS 228. 9% year-over-year, compared to -35. 2% for United-Guardian, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HWKN leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — UG or CBT or IOSP or HWKN or BCPC?

United-Guardian, Inc.

(UG) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 0% net margin versus 6. 6% for Innospec Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UG leads at 21. 3% versus 8. 8% for IOSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UG leads at 47. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is UG or CBT or IOSP or HWKN or BCPC more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Innospec Inc. (IOSP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 51x versus Balchem Corporation's 2. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Cabot Corporation (CBT) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 42. 4x for Hawkins, Inc. — 28. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IOSP: 50. 1% to $115. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — UG or CBT or IOSP or HWKN or BCPC?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

United-Guardian, Inc. (UG) offers the highest yield at 8. 6%, versus 0. 4% for Hawkins, Inc. (HWKN).

09

Is UG or CBT or IOSP or HWKN or BCPC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Balchem Corporation (BCPC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

31), 0. 5% yield, +162. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BCPC: +162. 9%, HWKN: +766. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between UG and CBT and IOSP and HWKN and BCPC?

These companies operate in different sectors (UG (Consumer Defensive) and CBT (Basic Materials) and IOSP (Basic Materials) and HWKN (Basic Materials) and BCPC (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: UG is a small-cap deep-value stock; CBT is a small-cap deep-value stock; IOSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; HWKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. UG, CBT, IOSP, BCPC pay a dividend while HWKN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

UG

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CBT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IOSP

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HWKN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BCPC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform UG and CBT and IOSP and HWKN and BCPC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(UG: 19.6% · CBT: -3.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(UG: 20.0% · CBT: 8.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(UG: 15.2x · CBT: 13.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.