Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UHAL vs RCMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
UHAL vs RCMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $9.19B | $213M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.00B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $139M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 49.5% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 136.8x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $7.24B | $26M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $989M | $3M |
UHAL vs RCMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U-Haul Holding Comp… (UHAL) | 100 | 161.6 | +61.6% |
| RCM Technologies, I… (RCMT) | 100 | 2239.6 | +2139.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UHAL vs RCMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UHAL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 0.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 96.6%, current ratio 1.45x
- Beta 1.04, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.45x
RCMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.7%, EPS growth 28.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 494.1% 10Y total return vs UHAL's 48.5%
- 14.7% revenue growth vs UHAL's 3.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.7% revenue growth vs UHAL's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 136.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.1% margin vs UHAL's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs RCMT's 1.30 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.3% vs UHAL's -16.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs UHAL's 0.6%, ROIC 26.9% vs 4.2% |
UHAL vs RCMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UHAL vs RCMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — UHAL and RCMT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UHAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 18.8x RCMT's $319M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.1% (RCMT) to 2.3% (UHAL). On growth, RCMT holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.0B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $139M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $17M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.5% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +12.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -160.5% | +116.2% |
Valuation Metrics
RCMT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, RCMT trades at a 55% valuation discount to UHAL's 30.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RCMT's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UHAL's 9.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.2B | $213M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.4B | $236M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.83x | 13.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 136.78x | 12.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.09x | 8.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 0.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 4.97x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCMT delivers a 40.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $2 for UHAL. RCMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UHAL's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCMT scores 8/9 vs UHAL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | +40.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +12.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +26.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +31.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.3B | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $989M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.2B | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.91x | 9.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCMT five years ago would be worth $88,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,552 for UHAL. Over the past 12 months, RCMT leads with a +74.3% total return vs UHAL's -16.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCMT at 35.0% vs UHAL's -5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.1% | +51.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.9% | +74.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.2% | +145.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.5% | +782.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.5% | +494.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.7% | +35.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UHAL and RCMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UHAL is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCMT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCMT currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs UHAL's 77.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.64 | $32.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.95 | $17.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 72.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 66K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates UHAL as "Buy" and RCMT as "Buy". UHAL is the only dividend payer here at 0.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% |
RCMT leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
UHAL vs RCMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UHAL or RCMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the stronger pick with 14. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL). RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UHAL or RCMT?
On trailing P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus U-Haul Holding Company at 30. 8x. On forward P/E, RCM Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UHAL or RCMT?
Over the past 5 years, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) delivered a total return of +782. 6%, compared to -14. 5% for U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCMT returned +494. 1% versus UHAL's +48. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UHAL or RCMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
04β versus RCM Technologies, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning RCMT is approximately 25% more volatile than UHAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 97% for U-Haul Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UHAL or RCMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is pulling ahead at 14. 7% versus 3. 6% for U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCM Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 28. 0% year-over-year, compared to -44. 5% for U-Haul Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCMT leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UHAL or RCMT?
U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
7% net margin versus 5. 1% for RCM Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UHAL leads at 12. 3% versus 7. 9% for RCMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UHAL leads at 85. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UHAL or RCMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 136. 8x for U-Haul Holding Company — 123. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — UHAL or RCMT?
In this comparison, UHAL (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. RCMT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UHAL or RCMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RCM Technologies, Inc.
(RCMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+494. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCMT: +494. 1%, UHAL: +48. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UHAL and RCMT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UHAL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCMT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.