Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UHAL vs REXR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
UHAL vs REXR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $9.19B | $8.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.00B | $996M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $139M | $212M |
| Gross Margin | 49.5% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 54.1% |
| Forward P/E | 136.8x | 31.0x |
| Total Debt | $7.24B | $3.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $989M | $166M |
UHAL vs REXR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U-Haul Holding Comp… (UHAL) | 100 | 161.6 | +61.6% |
| Rexford Industrial … (REXR) | 100 | 91.0 | -9.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UHAL vs REXR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, UHAL is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
REXR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 4.9%
- Rev growth 7.1%, EPS growth -28.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.7%
- 138.8% 10Y total return vs UHAL's 48.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.1% FFO/revenue growth vs UHAL's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.0x vs 136.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.3% margin vs UHAL's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs UHAL's 1.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs UHAL's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.7% vs UHAL's -16.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs UHAL's 0.6%, ROIC 2.4% vs 4.2% |
UHAL vs REXR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
UHAL vs REXR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REXR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UHAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 6.0x REXR's $996M. REXR is the more profitable business, keeping 21.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UHAL's 2.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.0B | $996M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $840M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $139M | $212M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.5% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +54.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +21.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | -0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -160.5% | -2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
UHAL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.8x trailing earnings, UHAL trades at a 27% valuation discount to REXR's 42.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UHAL's 9.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REXR's 17.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.2B | $8.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.4B | $11.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.83x | 42.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 136.78x | 30.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.09x | 17.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.58x | 8.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.36x | 0.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 41.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REXR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REXR delivers a 2.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $2 for UHAL. REXR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UHAL's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), REXR scores 5/9 vs UHAL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.8% | +2.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.2% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.3B | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $989M | $166M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.2B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.91x | 3.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UHAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UHAL five years ago would be worth $8,552 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,980 for REXR. Over the past 12 months, REXR leads with a +12.7% total return vs UHAL's -16.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UHAL at -5.7% vs REXR's -10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.1% | -6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.9% | +12.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.2% | -27.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.5% | -20.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.5% | +138.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.7% | -10.0% |
Risk & Volatility
REXR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REXR is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UHAL's 1.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REXR currently trades 81.6% from its 52-week high vs UHAL's 77.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $67.64 | $44.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.95 | $32.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.0% | +81.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
REXR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates UHAL as "Buy" and REXR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.6% upside for UHAL (target: $80) vs 17.3% for REXR (target: $43). For income investors, REXR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.90% vs UHAL's 0.35%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.00 | $42.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.18 | $1.77 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.9% |
REXR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UHAL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
UHAL vs REXR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UHAL or REXR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
(REXR) is the stronger pick with 7. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL). U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) offers the better valuation at 30. 8x trailing P/E (136. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UHAL or REXR?
On trailing P/E, U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) is the cheapest at 30.
8x versus Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. at 42. 1x. On forward P/E, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. is actually cheaper at 31. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UHAL or REXR?
Over the past 5 years, U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) delivered a total return of -14.
5%, compared to -20. 2% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REXR returned +138. 8% versus UHAL's +48. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UHAL or REXR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
(REXR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 88β versus U-Haul Holding Company's 1. 04β — meaning UHAL is approximately 18% more volatile than REXR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 97% for U-Haul Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UHAL or REXR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
(REXR) is pulling ahead at 7. 1% versus 3. 6% for U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. grew EPS -28. 3% year-over-year, compared to -44. 5% for U-Haul Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, REXR leads at 16. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UHAL or REXR?
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
(REXR) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 1% net margin versus 5. 7% for U-Haul Holding Company — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REXR leads at 37. 9% versus 12. 3% for UHAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UHAL leads at 85. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UHAL or REXR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
(REXR) trades at 31. 0x forward P/E versus 136. 8x for U-Haul Holding Company — 105. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UHAL: 53. 6% to $80. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UHAL or REXR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) offers the highest yield at 4. 9%, versus 0. 3% for U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL).
09Is UHAL or REXR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.
(REXR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 88), 4. 9% yield, +138. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (REXR: +138. 8%, UHAL: +48. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UHAL and REXR?
These companies operate in different sectors (UHAL (Industrials) and REXR (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UHAL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REXR is a small-cap income-oriented stock. REXR pays a dividend while UHAL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.