Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
UI vs CALX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
UI vs CALX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $62.21B | $2.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.97B | $1.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $889M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | 45.4% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 35.1% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 63.9x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $297M | $26M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $150M | $143M |
UI vs CALX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) | 100 | 557.6 | +457.6% |
| Calix, Inc. (CALX) | 100 | 314.5 | +214.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UI vs CALX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.4%, EPS growth 103.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
- 26.6% 10Y total return vs CALX's 5.3%
- 33.4% revenue growth vs CALX's 20.3%
CALX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.99
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 4.24x
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 4.24x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.4% revenue growth vs CALX's 20.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.0x vs 63.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.9% margin vs CALX's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs UI's 2.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.3% vs CALX's +5.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 55.3% ROA vs CALX's 3.5%, ROIC 81.4% vs 2.1% |
UI vs CALX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UI vs CALX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 2.8x CALX's $1.1B. UI is the more profitable business, keeping 29.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CALX's 3.2%. On growth, UI holds the edge at +35.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $889M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $708M | $109M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.4% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.1% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +10.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.8% | +27.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.8% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CALX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 87.4x trailing earnings, UI trades at a 49% valuation discount to CALX's 170.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CALX's 71.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UI's 72.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $62.2B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $62.4B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 87.44x | 170.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 63.85x | 24.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.76x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 72.67x | 70.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 24.17x | 2.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 93.15x | 3.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 99.15x | 24.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UI delivers a 87.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $88 in annual profit, vs $4 for CALX. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UI's 0.45x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +87.5% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +55.3% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +81.4% | +2.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +102.9% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $148M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $150M | $143M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $297M | $26M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 77.93x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UI five years ago would be worth $39,072 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,570 for CALX. Over the past 12 months, UI leads with a +199.3% total return vs CALX's +5.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UI at 75.3% vs CALX's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +81.7% | -17.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +199.3% | +5.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +438.5% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +290.7% | -4.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2659.3% | +534.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +75.3% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UI and CALX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CALX is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UI's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UI currently trades 93.5% from its 52-week high vs CALX's 62.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1099.99 | $71.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $337.05 | $40.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.5% | +62.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 47.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 937K |
Analyst Outlook
CALX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates UI as "Hold" and CALX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.6% upside for CALX (target: $61) vs -48.8% for UI (target: $527). UI is the only dividend payer here at 0.23% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $527.00 | $61.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +3.3% |
UI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CALX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
UI vs CALX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UI or CALX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is the stronger pick with 33. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 3% for Calix, Inc. (CALX). Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) offers the better valuation at 87. 4x trailing P/E (63. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Calix, Inc. (CALX) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UI or CALX?
On trailing P/E, Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is the cheapest at 87. 4x versus Calix, Inc. at 170. 5x. On forward P/E, Calix, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UI or CALX?
Over the past 5 years, Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) delivered a total return of +290. 7%, compared to -4. 3% for Calix, Inc. (CALX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UI returned +26. 6% versus CALX's +534. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UI or CALX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Ubiquiti Inc. 's 2. 10β — meaning UI is approximately 111% more volatile than CALX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 45% for Ubiquiti Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UI or CALX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is pulling ahead at 33. 4% versus 20. 3% for Calix, Inc. (CALX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Calix, Inc. grew EPS 157. 8% year-over-year, compared to 103. 1% for Ubiquiti Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UI leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UI or CALX?
Ubiquiti Inc.
(UI) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus 1. 8% for Calix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UI leads at 32. 5% versus 2. 1% for CALX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CALX leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UI or CALX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 63. 9x for Ubiquiti Inc. — 38. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CALX: 37. 6% to $61. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — UI or CALX?
In this comparison, UI (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CALX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is UI or CALX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Calix, Inc.
(CALX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +534. 3% 10Y return). Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CALX: +534. 3%, UI: +26. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UI and CALX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.