Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ULBI vs CLFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
ULBI vs CLFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $149M | $519M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $187M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-9M |
| Gross Margin | 23.9% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 3.3% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 8.2x | 72.1x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $9M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $21M |
ULBI vs CLFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultralife Corporati… (ULBI) | 100 | 84.4 | -15.6% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 271.1 | +171.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ULBI vs CLFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ULBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.50
- Lower volatility, beta 1.50, Low D/E 43.5%, current ratio 3.32x
- Beta 1.50, current ratio 3.32x
CLFD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.9%
- 106.7% 10Y total return vs ULBI's 71.5%
- 19.6% revenue growth vs ULBI's 3.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% revenue growth vs ULBI's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.2x vs 72.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.9% margin vs CLFD's -6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.50 vs CLFD's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.6% vs CLFD's +20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.8% ROA vs CLFD's -3.0%, ROIC 4.5% vs 0.6% |
ULBI vs CLFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ULBI vs CLFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ULBI and CLFD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ULBI and CLFD operate at a comparable scale, with $187M and $136M in trailing revenue. ULBI is the more profitable business, keeping 0.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLFD's -6.3%. On growth, ULBI holds the edge at +21.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $187M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$9M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | -6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.5% | -27.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.8% | -142.5% |
Valuation Metrics
ULBI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ULBI's 14.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CLFD's 61.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $149M | $519M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $200M | $506M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.55x | -64.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.20x | 72.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 5.31x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.18x | 61.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 3.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 2.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.11x | 21.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLFD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ULBI delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CLFD. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ULBI's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs ULBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.3% | -3.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | -3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $52M | -$13M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $21M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $9M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.60x | 85.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ULBI and CLFD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLFD five years ago would be worth $9,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,004 for ULBI. Over the past 12 months, ULBI leads with a +53.6% total return vs CLFD's +20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ULBI at 21.4% vs CLFD's 1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.8% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.6% | +20.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.9% | +3.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.0% | -4.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.5% | +106.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.4% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ULBI and CLFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ULBI is the less volatile stock with a 1.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLFD's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLFD currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs ULBI's 74.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.52 | $46.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.50 | $24.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.1% | +80.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 45K | 146K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ULBI as "Buy" and CLFD as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
ULBI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). CLFD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ULBI vs CLFD: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ULBI or CLFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Ultralife Corporation (ULBI). Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) offers the better valuation at 18. 6x trailing P/E (8. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ULBI or CLFD?
On forward P/E, Ultralife Corporation is actually cheaper at 8.
2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ULBI or CLFD?
Over the past 5 years, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) delivered a total return of -4. 1%, compared to -10. 0% for Ultralife Corporation (ULBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLFD returned +106. 7% versus ULBI's +71. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ULBI or CLFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
50β versus Clearfield, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning CLFD is approximately 20% more volatile than ULBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 44% for Ultralife Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ULBI or CLFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus 3. 7% for Ultralife Corporation (ULBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Clearfield, Inc. grew EPS 31. 8% year-over-year, compared to -13. 6% for Ultralife Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ULBI leads at 18. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ULBI or CLFD?
Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
8% net margin versus -5. 4% for Clearfield, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ULBI leads at 6. 1% versus 1. 4% for CLFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLFD leads at 33. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ULBI or CLFD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) trades at 8.
2x forward P/E versus 72. 1x for Clearfield, Inc. — 63. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ULBI or CLFD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ULBI or CLFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ULBI: +71. 5%, CLFD: +106. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ULBI and CLFD?
These companies operate in different sectors (ULBI (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ULBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.