Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ULBI vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
ULBI vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $99M | $22M | $548M | $4.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $188M | $17M | $136M | $446M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-9M | $-9M | $17M |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 4.9% | 37.2% | 53.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | -50.0% | 1.4% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | 6.9x | — | 75.9x | 58.7x |
| Total Debt | $50M | $12M | $9M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | — | $21M | $59M |
ULBI vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultralife Corporati… (ULBI) | 100 | 71.5 | -28.5% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 4.6 | -95.4% |
| Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) | 100 | 289.5 | +189.5% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ULBI vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ULBI is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 58.7x)
LIQT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 0.54
- Beta 0.54 vs POWI's 2.11
- +61.0% vs ULBI's +22.3%
CLFD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 31.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 5.42x
- 19.6% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
POWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs CLFD's 120.7%
- Beta 2.11, yield 1.1%, current ratio 6.51x
- 3.7% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
- 1.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 58.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs POWI's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.0% vs ULBI's +22.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.1% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 2.4% vs -31.1% |
ULBI vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ULBI vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
POWI leads in 2 of 6 categories
ULBI leads 1 • LIQT leads 0 • CLFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POWI is the larger business by revenue, generating $446M annually — 26.6x LIQT's $17M. POWI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $188M | $17M | $136M | $446M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | -$6M | $6M | $41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$9M | -$9M | $17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | -$7M | $16M | $85M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +4.9% | +37.2% | +53.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -50.0% | +1.4% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -53.3% | -6.3% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | -39.3% | +11.8% | +18.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.5% | +53.6% | -27.1% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -127.3% | +69.4% | -142.5% | -60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ULBI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ULBI's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than POWI's 81.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $99M | $22M | $548M | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $140M | $34M | $535M | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.06x | -2.55x | -69.03x | 187.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.94x | — | 75.91x | 58.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.99x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.86x | — | 64.96x | 81.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 1.32x | 3.65x | 9.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.76x | 2.10x | 2.19x | 6.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.97x | — | 22.18x | 46.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
POWI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POWI delivers a 2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. CLFD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIQT's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLFD scores 7/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -6.1% | -70.0% | -3.4% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | -29.5% | -3.0% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | -31.1% | +0.6% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | — | +0.8% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 1.17x | 0.03x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $40M | $12M | -$13M | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | — | $21M | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $50M | $12M | $9M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.08x | -13.46x | 65.80x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ULBI and POWI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLFD five years ago would be worth $11,247 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $392 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, LIQT leads with a +61.0% total return vs ULBI's +22.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ULBI at 14.9% vs LIQT's -12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.7% | +52.3% | +35.8% | +97.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.3% | +61.0% | +25.8% | +43.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.5% | -32.4% | +11.0% | -4.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.9% | -96.1% | +12.5% | -1.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.3% | -91.0% | +120.7% | +239.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | -12.3% | +3.5% | -1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIQT and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIQT is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. POWI currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs ULBI's 62.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.54x | 1.74x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.52 | $3.35 | $46.76 | $81.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.60 | $1.30 | $24.01 | $30.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.7% | +67.8% | +85.6% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 61.7 | 77.4 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 48K | 50K | 163K | 982K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ULBI as "Buy", CLFD as "Buy", POWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for CLFD (target: $43) vs 7.8% for POWI (target: $79). POWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.14% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $43.33 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | — | 8 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +2.4% |
POWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ULBI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ULBI vs LIQT vs CLFD vs POWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ULBI or LIQT or CLFD or POWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is the stronger pick with 19. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) offers the better valuation at 187. 9x trailing P/E (58. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ULBI or LIQT or CLFD or POWI?
On forward P/E, Ultralife Corporation is actually cheaper at 6.
9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ULBI or LIQT or CLFD or POWI?
Over the past 5 years, Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) delivered a total return of +12. 5%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWI returned +239. 0% versus LIQT's -91. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ULBI or LIQT or CLFD or POWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning POWI is approximately 292% more volatile than LIQT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 117% for LiqTech International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ULBI or LIQT or CLFD or POWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearfield, Inc.
(CLFD) is pulling ahead at 19. 6% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -192. 1% for Ultralife Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ULBI leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ULBI or LIQT or CLFD or POWI?
Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: POWI leads at 4. 8% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ULBI or LIQT or CLFD or POWI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ultralife Corporation (ULBI) trades at 6.
9x forward P/E versus 75. 9x for Clearfield, Inc. — 69. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLFD: 8. 2% to $43. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ULBI or LIQT or CLFD or POWI?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ULBI, LIQT, CLFD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ULBI or LIQT or CLFD or POWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54)). Clearfield, Inc. (CLFD) carries a higher beta of 1. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIQT: -91. 0%, CLFD: +120. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ULBI and LIQT and CLFD and POWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (ULBI (Industrials) and LIQT (Industrials) and CLFD (Technology) and POWI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ULBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLFD is a small-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while ULBI, LIQT, CLFD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.