UOKA
MDJM Ltd
Real Estate - Services
Market Cap$972K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
UOKA vs OPEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
Real Estate - Services
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.+100.0%
UOKA vs OPEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | UOKA | OPEN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $972K | $4.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $193K | $3.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-1.39B |
| Gross Margin | -14.3% | 7.9% |
| Operating Margin | -21.3% | -9.9% |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $962M |
UOKA vs OPEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
UOKA
OPEN
| Stock | Nov 24 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MDJM Ltd (UOKA) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 200.0 | +100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UOKA vs OPEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: OPEN leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MDJM Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
UOKA
MDJM Ltd
The Real Estate Income Play
UOKA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 2.28
- Lower volatility, beta 2.28, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 2.28, current ratio 1.20x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
OPEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -15.2%, EPS growth -203.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -34.5%
- -50.8% 10Y total return vs UOKA's -100.0%
- -15.2% FFO/revenue growth vs UOKA's -66.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | OPEN | -15.2% FFO/revenue growth vs UOKA's -66.6% |
| Quality / Margins | OPEN | -35.2% margin vs UOKA's -22.5% |
| Stability / Safety | UOKA | Beta 2.28 vs OPEN's 3.09 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | OPEN | +5.1% vs UOKA's -99.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | OPEN | -53.6% ROA vs UOKA's -83.5%, ROIC -15.8% vs -81.6% |
UOKA vs OPEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLOPENLAGGINGUOKA
UOKAMDJM Ltd
0leads
OPENOpendoor Technologies…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs UOKAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
OPEN6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
OPEN2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
OPEN5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
OPEN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.9B annually — 20379.0x UOKA's $193,238. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -35.2% (OPEN) to -22.5% (UOKA). On growth, OPEN holds the edge at -37.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | UOKAMDJM Ltd | OPENOpendoor Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $193,238 | $3.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$363M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -14.3% | +7.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -21.3% | -9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.5% | -35.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.4% | -37.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -50.0% |
OPEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
OPEN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | UOKAMDJM Ltd | OPENOpendoor Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $972,403 | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$854,431 | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.30x | -3.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 20.10x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.27x | 4.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.93x |
OPEN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OPEN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UOKA delivers a -121.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-121 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPEN scores 5/9 vs UOKA's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | UOKAMDJM Ltd | OPENOpendoor Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -121.4% | -163.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -83.5% | -53.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -81.6% | -15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -74.8% | -11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $962M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -8.92x |
OPEN leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OPEN five years ago would be worth $2,845 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for UOKA. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs UOKA's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs UOKA's -92.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | UOKAMDJM Ltd | OPENOpendoor Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -99.9% | -12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | +510.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +159.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -71.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -50.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.2% | +37.4% |
OPEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UOKA and OPEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UOKA is the less volatile stock with a 2.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OPEN currently trades 48.9% from its 52-week high vs UOKA's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | UOKAMDJM Ltd | OPENOpendoor Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.28x | 3.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $175.00 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.05 | $0.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.1 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 21.7M | 36.3M |
Evenly matched — UOKA and OPEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | UOKAMDJM Ltd | OPENOpendoor Technolo… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
OPEN leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallOpendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
UOKA vs OPEN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UOKA or OPEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Opendoor Technologies Inc.
(OPEN) is the stronger pick with -15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -66. 6% for MDJM Ltd (UOKA). Analysts rate Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) a "Hold" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UOKA or OPEN?
Over the past 5 years, Opendoor Technologies Inc.
(OPEN) delivered a total return of -71. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for MDJM Ltd (UOKA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OPEN returned -50. 8% versus UOKA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UOKA or OPEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MDJM Ltd (UOKA) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
28β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 36% more volatile than UOKA relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — UOKA or OPEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Opendoor Technologies Inc.
(OPEN) is pulling ahead at -15. 2% versus -66. 6% for MDJM Ltd (UOKA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MDJM Ltd grew EPS -117. 1% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OPEN leads at -34. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UOKA or OPEN?
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
(OPEN) is the more profitable company, earning -29. 7% net margin versus -65. 9% for MDJM Ltd — meaning it keeps -29. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPEN leads at -6. 2% versus -57. 7% for UOKA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UOKA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UOKA or OPEN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is UOKA or OPEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Opendoor Technologies Inc.
(OPEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. MDJM Ltd (UOKA) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OPEN: -50. 8%, UOKA: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UOKA and OPEN?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(UOKA: -63.4% · OPEN: -37.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.