Broadcasting
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UONE vs IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
Broadcasting
Entertainment
UONE vs IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Broadcasting | Broadcasting | Broadcasting | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $17M | $560M | $87K | $9.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $360M | $3.94B | $772M | $8.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-138M | $-287M | $-297M | $846M |
| Gross Margin | 60.9% | 56.5% | 62.7% | 45.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 0.4% | -31.3% | 18.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 9.4x |
| Total Debt | $488M | $5.79B | $795M | $9.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $26M | $271M | $64M | $94M |
UONE vs IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urban One, Inc. (UONE) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
| iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) | 100 | 51.6 | -48.4% |
| Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Sirius XM Holdings … (SIRI) | 100 | 50.3 | -49.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UONE vs IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UONE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
IHRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 0.3%, EPS growth 54.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.4%
- 0.3% revenue growth vs UONE's -16.7%
- +219.3% vs CMLS's -96.3%
CMLS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SIRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 3.5%
- -2.3% 10Y total return vs IHRT's -76.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 83.9%, current ratio 0.30x
- Beta 0.65, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.30x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.3% revenue growth vs UONE's -16.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.9% margin vs CMLS's -38.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs CMLS's 1.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +219.3% vs CMLS's -96.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.1% ROA vs CMLS's -27.1%, ROIC 5.2% vs -20.5% |
UONE vs IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
UONE vs IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SIRI leads in 4 of 6 categories
CMLS leads 1 • UONE leads 0 • IHRT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.6B annually — 23.9x UONE's $360M. SIRI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CMLS's -38.4%. On growth, IHRT holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $360M | $3.9B | $772M | $8.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $68M | $365M | -$185M | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$138M | -$287M | -$297M | $846M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | -$23M | -$10M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.9% | +56.5% | +62.7% | +45.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +0.4% | -31.3% | +18.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.4% | -7.3% | -38.4% | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | -0.6% | -1.3% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.8% | +9.6% | -11.5% | +1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -165.4% | +66.8% | -91.8% | +22.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CMLS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, UONE's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IHRT's 11.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $560M | $87,200 | $9.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $479M | $6.1B | $731M | $19.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.20x | -1.41x | -0.00x | 13.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 9.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.46x | 10.98x | — | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 0.14x | 0.00x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.08x | — | 0.01x | 0.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 51.35x | — | 7.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SIRI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SIRI delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-3 for UONE. SIRI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMLS's 114.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SIRI scores 5/9 vs CMLS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | — | -193.0% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.1% | -5.5% | -27.1% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +3.7% | -20.5% | +5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.5% | +4.1% | -21.0% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 17.93x | — | 114.33x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $462M | $5.5B | $731M | $9.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $26M | $271M | $64M | $94M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $488M | $5.8B | $795M | $9.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.43x | 0.80x | -0.03x | 3.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IHRT and SIRI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SIRI five years ago would be worth $5,886 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for CMLS. Over the past 12 months, IHRT leads with a +219.3% total return vs CMLS's -96.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IHRT at 22.6% vs CMLS's -88.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.0% | +3.9% | -93.2% | +46.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.1% | +219.3% | -96.3% | +36.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.9% | +84.2% | -99.8% | -9.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | -82.0% | -100.0% | -41.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.2% | -76.1% | -100.0% | -2.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -53.4% | +22.6% | -88.4% | -3.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SIRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIRI is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMLS's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIRI currently trades 98.0% from its 52-week high vs CMLS's 2.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 1.77x | 1.89x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.00 | $6.56 | $0.19 | $30.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.10 | $1.26 | $0.00 | $19.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.7% | +65.7% | +2.6% | +98.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 50.0 | 25.5 | 73.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 125K | 1.2M | 935K | 4.8M |
Analyst Outlook
SIRI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IHRT as "Buy", SIRI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -5.8% upside for SIRI (target: $28) vs -18.8% for IHRT (target: $4). SIRI is the only dividend payer here at 3.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.50 | — | $27.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | — | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +16.4% | 0.0% | +100.0% | +1.4% |
SIRI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMLS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
UONE vs IHRT vs CMLS vs SIRI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UONE or IHRT or CMLS or SIRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, iHeartMedia, Inc.
(IHRT) is the stronger pick with 0. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 7% for Urban One, Inc. (UONE). Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate iHeartMedia, Inc. (IHRT) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UONE or IHRT or CMLS or SIRI?
Over the past 5 years, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) delivered a total return of -41. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIRI returned -2. 3% versus CMLS's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UONE or IHRT or CMLS or SIRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Cumulus Media Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning CMLS is approximately 193% more volatile than SIRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sirius XM Holdings Inc. (SIRI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 114% for Cumulus Media Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — UONE or IHRT or CMLS or SIRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), iHeartMedia, Inc.
(IHRT) is pulling ahead at 0. 3% versus -16. 7% for Urban One, Inc. (UONE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sirius XM Holdings Inc. grew EPS 145. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1383. 8% for Urban One, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IHRT leads at -0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UONE or IHRT or CMLS or SIRI?
Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -39. 2% for Urban One, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIRI leads at 17. 2% versus -29. 0% for CMLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UONE leads at 61. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is UONE or IHRT or CMLS or SIRI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SIRI: -5.
8% to $27. 80.
07Which pays a better dividend — UONE or IHRT or CMLS or SIRI?
In this comparison, SIRI (3.
5% yield) pays a dividend. UONE, IHRT, CMLS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is UONE or IHRT or CMLS or SIRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sirius XM Holdings Inc.
(SIRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 3. 5% yield). Cumulus Media Inc. (CMLS) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIRI: -2. 3%, CMLS: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between UONE and IHRT and CMLS and SIRI?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UONE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IHRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIRI is a small-cap deep-value stock. SIRI pays a dividend while UONE, IHRT, CMLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 33%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare SIRI vs AUDC
AUDC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to SIRI.
Compare UONE vs NXST
NXST overlaps with UONE in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Add SPOT to This Comparison
SPOT is the strongest missing peer across the current compare set.