Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
UPC vs XTLB vs SIGA vs NUVB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
UPC vs XTLB vs SIGA vs NUVB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2M | $294K | $339M | $1.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $451K | $94M | $143M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $-1M | $-4.04T | $-146M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 26.4% | 61.8% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -26.7% | -481.6% | 27.7% | -105.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 2.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $138K | $595K | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $371K | $155M | $164M |
UPC vs XTLB vs SIGA vs NUVB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Universe Pharmaceut… (UPC) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| XTL Biopharmaceutic… (XTLB) | 100 | 20.0 | -80.0% |
| SIGA Technologies, … (SIGA) | 100 | 72.8 | -27.2% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 46.1 | -53.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UPC vs XTLB vs SIGA vs NUVB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UPC is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- -30.3% margin vs SIGA's -43K%
XTLB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SIGA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 12.7%
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs NUVB's -51.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 11.83x
- Beta 1.15, yield 12.7%, current ratio 11.83x
NUVB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 71.6%
- 7.0% revenue growth vs XTLB's -173.2%
- +136.3% vs XTLB's -50.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs XTLB's -173.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -30.3% margin vs SIGA's -43K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs NUVB's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 12.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.3% vs XTLB's -50.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -7.4% ROA vs NUVB's -23.8%, ROIC 33.7% vs -54.3% |
UPC vs XTLB vs SIGA vs NUVB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
UPC vs XTLB vs SIGA vs NUVB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NUVB leads in 2 of 6 categories
SIGA leads 2 • UPC leads 1 • XTLB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUVB is the larger business by revenue, generating $143M annually — 317.2x XTLB's $451,000. UPC is the more profitable business, keeping -30.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIGA's -43117.4%. On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $451,000 | $94M | $143M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$1M | $26M | -$145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | -$1M | -$4.04T | -$146M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $0 | $33M | -$126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +26.4% | +61.8% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.7% | -4.8% | +27.7% | -105.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -30.3% | -2.3% | -43117.4% | -102.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -37.2% | -3.7% | +35.2% | -88.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.1% | — | -11.3% | +26.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.1% | +20.0% | — | +106.3% |
Valuation Metrics
UPC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $293,767 | $339M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$23M | $60,767 | $185M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -0.28x | 14.33x | -8.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 2.78x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 7.60x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 0.65x | 3.58x | 26.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.05x | 1.70x | 5.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 6.96x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SIGA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SIGA delivers a -10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-11 in annual profit, vs $-44 for NUVB. SIGA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPC's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SIGA scores 5/9 vs XTLB's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.0% | -25.5% | -10.7% | -44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.6% | -17.7% | -7.4% | -23.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.8% | -54.1% | +33.7% | -54.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.6% | -50.7% | +11.3% | -42.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.03x | 0.00x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$24M | -$233,000 | -$154M | -$154M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $371,000 | $155M | $164M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $138,000 | $595,169 | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -22.11x | -13.31x | — | -162.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SIGA five years ago would be worth $10,136 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for UPC. Over the past 12 months, NUVB leads with a +136.3% total return vs XTLB's -50.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVB at 43.8% vs UPC's -89.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.9% | +11.3% | -15.0% | -43.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -41.1% | -50.9% | +1.5% | +136.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -45.7% | +22.2% | +197.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -80.4% | +1.4% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -87.3% | +764.0% | -51.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.3% | -18.4% | +6.9% | +43.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SIGA and NUVB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIGA is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NUVB's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUVB currently trades 49.4% from its 52-week high vs XTLB's 26.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.26x | 1.71x | 1.15x | 2.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $10.28 | $9.62 | $9.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.00 | $1.05 | $4.29 | $1.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.3% | +26.0% | +49.2% | +49.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 57.0 | 47.0 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 2.4M | 688K | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
SIGA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIGA as "Buy", NUVB as "Buy". SIGA is the only dividend payer here at 12.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $12.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 1 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +12.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.60 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NUVB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SIGA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
UPC vs XTLB vs SIGA vs NUVB: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UPC or XTLB or SIGA or NUVB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -31. 8% for SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA). SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (2. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — UPC or XTLB or SIGA or NUVB?
Over the past 5 years, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc. (UPC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SIGA returned +764. 0% versus UPC's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — UPC or XTLB or SIGA or NUVB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus Nuvation Bio Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning NUVB is approximately 77% more volatile than SIGA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — UPC or XTLB or SIGA or NUVB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus -31. 8% for SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nuvation Bio Inc. grew EPS 71. 6% year-over-year, compared to -60. 2% for SIGA Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SIGA leads at -5. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — UPC or XTLB or SIGA or NUVB?
SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 6% net margin versus -325. 3% for Nuvation Bio Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIGA leads at 25. 1% versus -481. 6% for XTLB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NUVB leads at 86. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — UPC or XTLB or SIGA or NUVB?
In this comparison, SIGA (12.
7% yield) pays a dividend. UPC, XTLB, NUVB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is UPC or XTLB or SIGA or NUVB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SIGA Technologies, Inc.
(SIGA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 12. 7% yield, +764. 0% 10Y return). Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIGA: +764. 0%, NUVB: -51. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between UPC and XTLB and SIGA and NUVB?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: UPC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XTLB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIGA is a small-cap deep-value stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock. SIGA pays a dividend while UPC, XTLB, NUVB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.