Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs NHI vs KELYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
REIT - Residential
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Staffing & Employment Services
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs NHI vs KELYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Staffing & Employment Services | REIT - Residential | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $59.14B | $790M | $277M | $3.64B | $349M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.36B | $1.33B | $98M | $403M | $3.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.51B | $35M | $-12M | $148M | $-266M |
| Gross Margin | 36.3% | 27.2% | 12.6% | 61.3% | 26.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 3.8% | 6.1% | 48.5% | -2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 18.0x | — | 22.2x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $16.48B | $70M | $508M | $1.16B | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $459M | $2M | $25M | $20M | $33M |
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs NHI vs KELYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) | 100 | 130.5 | +30.5% |
| National Health Inv… (NHI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs NHI vs KELYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
URI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth -0.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs BRT's 217.9%
- +46.0% vs KELYA's -12.2%
KFRC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs URI's 1.19, lower leverage
BRT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 7.1% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%
NHI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and quality is your priority.
- 12.9% FFO/revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 36.8% margin vs BRT's -12.5%
KELYA is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 22.2x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% FFO/revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.8% margin vs BRT's -12.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs URI's 1.19, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.0% vs KELYA's -12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs NHI vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs NHI vs KELYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NHI leads in 1 of 6 categories
KELYA leads 1 • KFRC leads 1 • URI leads 1 • BRT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NHI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 167.0x BRT's $98M. NHI is the more profitable business, keeping 36.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRT's -12.5%. On growth, NHI holds the edge at +29.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.4B | $1.3B | $98M | $403M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.5B | $56M | $33M | $282M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.5B | $35M | -$12M | $148M | -$266M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $43M | $16M | $226M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +27.2% | +12.6% | +61.3% | +26.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +3.8% | +6.1% | +48.5% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +2.6% | -12.5% | +36.8% | -8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +3.3% | +16.2% | +56.1% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | +0.1% | +4.2% | +29.7% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | +2.2% | -16.7% | +10.8% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
KELYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, KFRC trades at a 11% valuation discount to NHI's 24.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, URI's 10.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BRT's 20.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $59.1B | $790M | $277M | $3.6B | $349M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $75.2B | $858M | $760M | $4.8B | $475M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.45x | 22.05x | -22.31x | 24.85x | -1.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.14x | 17.96x | — | 22.17x | 10.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.61x | 15.42x | 20.32x | 17.16x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.67x | 0.59x | 2.86x | 9.61x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.80x | 6.17x | 1.50x | 2.29x | 0.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 89.34x | 16.88x | 25.60x | 16.52x | 3.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
URI delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRT's 2.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NHI scores 6/9 vs BRT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.9% | +27.2% | -6.8% | +9.8% | -24.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.4% | +9.2% | -1.7% | +5.4% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.4% | +19.1% | +1.3% | +5.6% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.6% | +20.1% | +1.6% | +8.0% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.84x | 0.56x | 2.87x | 0.76x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16.0B | $68M | $483M | $1.1B | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $459M | $2M | $25M | $20M | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.5B | $70M | $508M | $1.2B | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.72x | — | 0.51x | 3.45x | -12.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
URI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in URI five years ago would be worth $27,803 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,168 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, URI leads with a +46.0% total return vs KELYA's -12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors URI at 41.4% vs KELYA's -13.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +39.2% | +3.5% | -1.1% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.0% | +18.9% | +2.7% | +2.8% | -12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +182.8% | -13.8% | +1.0% | +73.5% | -34.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.0% | -16.8% | +7.5% | +31.0% | -58.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1482.5% | +195.5% | +217.9% | +58.9% | -33.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.4% | -4.8% | +0.3% | +20.2% | -13.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — URI and NHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NHI is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than URI's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. URI currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 64.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.53x | 0.65x | -0.08x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1021.47 | $47.48 | $16.69 | $90.94 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $647.05 | $24.49 | $13.18 | $68.80 | $7.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +91.0% | +88.2% | +82.5% | +64.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.4 | 65.6 | 56.6 | 28.0 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 557K | 305K | 54K | 332K | 361K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFRC and BRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: URI as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", BRT as "Buy", NHI as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 9.9% for URI (target: $1037). For income investors, BRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.13% vs URI's 0.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1037.13 | $71.00 | $21.00 | $85.40 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 10 | 5 | 18 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +3.6% | +7.1% | +4.8% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.18 | $1.55 | $1.05 | $3.61 | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +6.4% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +3.5% |
NHI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KELYA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs NHI vs KELYA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is URI or KFRC or BRT or NHI or KELYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Rentals, Inc. (URI) a "Buy" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — URI or KFRC or BRT or NHI or KELYA?
On trailing P/E, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus National Health Investors, Inc. at 24. 9x. On forward P/E, Kelly Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — URI or KFRC or BRT or NHI or KELYA?
Over the past 5 years, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) delivered a total return of +178. 0%, compared to -58. 3% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1483% versus KELYA's -33. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — URI or KFRC or BRT or NHI or KELYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus United Rentals, Inc. 's 1. 19β — meaning URI is approximately -1511% more volatile than NHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — URI or KFRC or BRT or NHI or KELYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Rentals, Inc. grew EPS -0. 2% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, URI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — URI or KFRC or BRT or NHI or KELYA?
National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 6% net margin versus -12. 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — meaning it keeps 37. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NHI leads at 51. 5% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NHI leads at 36. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is URI or KFRC or BRT or NHI or KELYA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kelly Services, Inc.
(KELYA) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for National Health Investors, Inc. — 11. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — URI or KFRC or BRT or NHI or KELYA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 0. 8% for United Rentals, Inc. (URI).
09Is URI or KFRC or BRT or NHI or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 4. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHI: +58. 9%, KELYA: -33. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between URI and KFRC and BRT and NHI and KELYA?
These companies operate in different sectors (URI (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and BRT (Real Estate) and NHI (Real Estate) and KELYA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.