Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs TREX vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
REIT - Residential
Construction
Construction
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs TREX vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Staffing & Employment Services | REIT - Residential | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $59.14B | $790M | $277M | $4.12B | $8.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.36B | $1.33B | $98M | $1.18B | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.51B | $35M | $-12M | $191M | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 36.3% | 27.2% | 12.6% | 39.2% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 3.8% | 6.1% | 22.1% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 18.0x | — | 24.0x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $16.48B | $70M | $508M | $229M | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $459M | $2M | $25M | $4M | $182M |
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs TREX vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) | 100 | 130.5 | +30.5% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 381.9 | +281.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs TREX vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
URI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth -0.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 6.1%
- PEG 0.78 vs TREX's 7.16
- 4.9% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, BRT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TREX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 16.3% margin vs BRT's -12.5%
- 12.3% ROA vs BRT's -1.7%, ROIC 16.4% vs 1.3%
BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 24.0x), PEG 1.78 vs 7.16
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.9% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 24.0x), PEG 1.78 vs 7.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs BRT's -12.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs BRT's 7.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.0% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs BRT's -1.7%, ROIC 16.4% vs 1.3% |
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs TREX vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs TREX vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BLDR leads in 1 of 6 categories
TREX leads 1 • URI leads 1 • KFRC leads 0 • BRT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — URI and TREX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 167.0x BRT's $98M. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRT's -12.5%. On growth, URI holds the edge at +7.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.4B | $1.3B | $98M | $1.2B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.5B | $56M | $33M | $309M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.5B | $35M | -$12M | $191M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | $43M | $16M | $263M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +27.2% | +12.6% | +39.2% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +3.8% | +6.1% | +22.1% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +2.6% | -12.5% | +16.3% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +3.3% | +16.2% | +22.3% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | +0.1% | +4.2% | +1.0% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | +2.2% | -16.7% | +3.6% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BLDR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.4x trailing earnings, BLDR trades at a 16% valuation discount to URI's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URI offers better value at 0.94x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $59.1B | $790M | $277M | $4.1B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $75.2B | $858M | $760M | $4.3B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.45x | 22.05x | -22.31x | 22.00x | 20.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.14x | 17.96x | — | 23.95x | 14.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.94x | — | — | 6.58x | 2.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.61x | 15.42x | 20.32x | 13.53x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.67x | 0.59x | 2.86x | 3.51x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.80x | 6.17x | 1.50x | 4.05x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 89.34x | 16.88x | 25.60x | 30.60x | 10.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
URI delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-7 for BRT. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BRT's 2.87x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TREX scores 6/9 vs BRT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.9% | +27.2% | -6.8% | +18.8% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.4% | +9.2% | -1.7% | +12.3% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.4% | +19.1% | +1.3% | +16.4% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.6% | +20.1% | +1.6% | +23.2% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.84x | 0.56x | 2.87x | 0.22x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16.0B | $68M | $483M | $225M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $459M | $2M | $25M | $4M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.5B | $70M | $508M | $229M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.72x | — | 0.51x | — | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
URI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in URI five years ago would be worth $27,803 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, URI leads with a +46.0% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors URI at 41.4% vs TREX's -11.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.0% | +39.2% | +3.5% | +9.3% | -24.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.0% | +18.9% | +2.7% | -30.8% | -25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +182.8% | -13.8% | +1.0% | -30.4% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.0% | -16.8% | +7.5% | -64.0% | +51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1482.5% | +195.5% | +217.9% | +239.9% | +614.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +41.4% | -4.8% | +0.3% | -11.4% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — URI and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. URI currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.53x | 0.65x | 1.47x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1021.47 | $47.48 | $16.69 | $68.78 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $647.05 | $24.49 | $13.18 | $29.77 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +91.0% | +88.2% | +56.9% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.4 | 65.6 | 56.6 | 51.3 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 557K | 305K | 54K | 1.7M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFRC and BRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: URI as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", BRT as "Buy", TREX as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 9.9% for URI (target: $1037). For income investors, BRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.13% vs URI's 0.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1037.13 | $71.00 | $21.00 | $44.50 | $109.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 10 | 5 | 31 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +3.6% | +7.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $7.18 | $1.55 | $1.05 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +6.4% | +1.8% | +1.3% | +4.7% |
BLDR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). TREX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
URI vs KFRC vs BRT vs TREX vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is URI or KFRC or BRT or TREX or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger pick with 4. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Rentals, Inc. (URI) a "Buy" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — URI or KFRC or BRT or TREX or BLDR?
On trailing P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is the cheapest at 20. 4x versus United Rentals, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — URI or KFRC or BRT or TREX or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) delivered a total return of +178. 0%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1483% versus KFRC's +195. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — URI or KFRC or BRT or TREX or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 213% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — URI or KFRC or BRT or TREX or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is pulling ahead at 4. 9% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Rentals, Inc. grew EPS -0. 2% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, URI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — URI or KFRC or BRT or TREX or BLDR?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -12. 3% for BRT Apartments Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: URI leads at 24. 7% versus 3. 8% for KFRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREX leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is URI or KFRC or BRT or TREX or BLDR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — URI or KFRC or BRT or TREX or BLDR?
In this comparison, BRT (7.
1% yield), KFRC (3. 6% yield), URI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TREX, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is URI or KFRC or BRT or TREX or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 0. 8% yield, +1483% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1483%, TREX: +239. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between URI and KFRC and BRT and TREX and BLDR?
These companies operate in different sectors (URI (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and BRT (Real Estate) and TREX (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. URI, KFRC, BRT pay a dividend while TREX, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.