Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
USAR vs AMRK vs FCX vs CMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Copper
Steel
USAR vs AMRK vs FCX vs CMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Financial - Capital Markets | Copper | Steel |
| Market Cap | $589M | $1.16B | $87.11B | $7.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $10.98B | $26.42B | $8.01B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-246M | $12M | $2.73B | $438M |
| Gross Margin | 80.9% | 1.9% | 27.8% | 16.5% |
| Operating Margin | 53.6% | 0.4% | 27.8% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 67.6x | 19.5x | 22.4x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $907M | $11.50B | $1.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2K | $78M | $3.35B | $1.04B |
USAR vs AMRK vs FCX vs CMC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) | 100 | 444.1 | +344.1% |
| A-Mark Precious Met… (AMRK) | 100 | 204.4 | +104.4% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 160.1 | +60.1% |
| Commercial Metals C… (CMC) | 100 | 153.2 | +53.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USAR vs AMRK vs FCX vs CMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USAR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in dividends and momentum.
- 2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0%
- +147.9% vs CMC's +58.2%
AMRK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 1.6%
- 397.5% 10Y total return vs FCX's 5.1%
- Beta 1.07, yield 1.6%, current ratio 1.56x
- 13.2% NII/revenue growth vs USAR's -64.5%
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 10.3% margin vs USAR's -77.4%
- 4.7% ROA vs USAR's -162.9%, ROIC 12.8% vs -2.3%
CMC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 32.3%, current ratio 2.78x
- Lower P/E (10.8x vs 22.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.2% NII/revenue growth vs USAR's -64.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.8x vs 22.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs USAR's -77.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs USAR's 2.18 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FCX's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +147.9% vs CMC's +58.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs USAR's -162.9%, ROIC 12.8% vs -2.3% |
USAR vs AMRK vs FCX vs CMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
USAR vs AMRK vs FCX vs CMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
USAR leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMRK leads 1 • FCX leads 1 • CMC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USAR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 1224.3x USAR's $22M. FCX is the more profitable business, keeping 10.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAR's -77.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $11.0B | $26.4B | $8.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $170M | $75M | $9.6B | $890M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$246M | $12M | $2.7B | $438M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $154M | $316M | $6.2B | $296M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.9% | +1.9% | +27.8% | +16.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +53.6% | +0.4% | +27.8% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -77.4% | +0.2% | +10.3% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | +1.3% | +23.6% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.2% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +70.4% | +154.2% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AMRK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 39.9x trailing earnings, FCX trades at a 58% valuation discount to CMC's 95.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CMC's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMRK's 27.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $589M | $1.2B | $87.1B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $589M | $2.0B | $95.3B | $8.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 67.64x | 65.80x | 39.88x | 95.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.47x | 22.41x | 10.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.33x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.78x | 11.16x | 10.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.11x | 3.38x | 1.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 24.40x | 1.63x | 2.84x | 1.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.21x | 78.05x | 25.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CMC delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $2 for AMRK. CMC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRK's 1.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMRK scores 5/9 vs USAR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | +1.8% | +8.9% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -162.9% | +0.3% | +4.7% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | +2.4% | +12.8% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | +4.8% | +12.4% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.29x | 0.37x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2,101 | $829M | $8.1B | $311M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2,101 | $78M | $3.4B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $907M | $11.5B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1572.30x | 1.06x | 17.68x | 9.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMRK five years ago would be worth $26,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, USAR leads with a +147.9% total return vs CMC's +58.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAR at 34.2% vs AMRK's 10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +86.4% | +34.9% | +17.3% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +147.9% | +98.2% | +65.3% | +58.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.8% | +35.6% | +70.7% | +63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.8% | +165.3% | +44.3% | +127.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.8% | +397.5% | +507.7% | +356.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.2% | +10.7% | +19.5% | +17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMRK and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMRK is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAR's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCX currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs USAR's 60.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.18x | 1.07x | 1.79x | 1.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.98 | $59.97 | $70.97 | $84.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $19.39 | $35.15 | $44.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.0% | +77.9% | +85.4% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 62.9 | 49.1 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.0M | 545K | 15.4M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — USAR and FCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USAR as "Buy", AMRK as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", CMC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.6% upside for USAR (target: $34) vs -27.2% for AMRK (target: $34). For income investors, USAR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.04% vs FCX's 0.99%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.20 | $34.00 | $67.00 | $82.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 4 | 41 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.6% | +1.0% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.54 | $0.77 | $0.60 | $0.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.1% | +2.7% |
USAR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AMRK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
USAR vs AMRK vs FCX vs CMC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USAR or AMRK or FCX or CMC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.
(AMRK) is the stronger pick with 13. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) offers the better valuation at 39. 9x trailing P/E (22. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USAR or AMRK or FCX or CMC?
On trailing P/E, Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
(FCX) is the cheapest at 39. 9x versus Commercial Metals Company at 95. 3x. On forward P/E, Commercial Metals Company is actually cheaper at 10. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USAR or AMRK or FCX or CMC?
Over the past 5 years, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.
(AMRK) delivered a total return of +165. 3%, compared to +44. 3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCX returned +507. 7% versus USAR's +141. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USAR or AMRK or FCX or CMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.
(AMRK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus USA Rare Earth Inc's 2. 18β — meaning USAR is approximately 103% more volatile than AMRK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 129% for A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USAR or AMRK or FCX or CMC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.
(AMRK) is pulling ahead at 13. 2% versus -1. 6% for Commercial Metals Company (CMC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: USA Rare Earth Inc grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to -82. 1% for Commercial Metals Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, FCX leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USAR or AMRK or FCX or CMC?
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
(FCX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus -77. 4% for USA Rare Earth Inc — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USAR leads at 53. 6% versus 0. 4% for AMRK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USAR leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USAR or AMRK or FCX or CMC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) trades at 10.
8x forward P/E versus 22. 4x for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — 11. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USAR: 29. 6% to $34. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — USAR or AMRK or FCX or CMC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 0% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX).
09Is USAR or AMRK or FCX or CMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, A-Mark Precious Metals, Inc.
(AMRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), 1. 6% yield, +397. 5% 10Y return). USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMRK: +397. 5%, USAR: +141. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USAR and AMRK and FCX and CMC?
These companies operate in different sectors (USAR (Basic Materials) and AMRK (Financial Services) and FCX (Basic Materials) and CMC (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.