Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
USAR vs LIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
USAR vs LIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $589M | $228.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $34.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-246M | $7.13B |
| Gross Margin | 80.9% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 53.6% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 67.6x | 27.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $26.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2K | $5.06B |
USAR vs LIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) | 100 | 444.1 | +344.1% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USAR vs LIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USAR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 39.3%
- 2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%
- +147.9% vs LIN's +11.2%
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
- 375.2% 10Y total return vs USAR's 141.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs USAR's -64.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.7x vs 67.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs USAR's -77.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs USAR's 2.18 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +147.9% vs LIN's +11.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs USAR's -162.9%, ROIC 11.3% vs -2.3% |
USAR vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
USAR vs LIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USAR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 1605.9x USAR's $22M. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAR's -77.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $34.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $170M | $12.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$246M | $7.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $154M | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.9% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +53.6% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -77.4% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.8x trailing earnings, LIN trades at a 50% valuation discount to USAR's 67.6x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $589M | $228.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $589M | $250.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 67.64x | 33.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 24.40x | 5.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $7 for USAR. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs USAR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.5% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -162.9% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2,101 | $21.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2,101 | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1572.30x | 34.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USAR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USAR five years ago would be worth $24,180 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,394 for LIN. Over the past 12 months, USAR leads with a +147.9% total return vs LIN's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAR at 34.2% vs LIN's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +86.4% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +147.9% | +11.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.8% | +39.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.8% | +73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.8% | +375.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.2% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAR's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs USAR's 60.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.18x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $43.98 | $521.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $387.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.0% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.2 | 51.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.0M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — USAR and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates USAR as "Buy" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.6% upside for USAR (target: $34) vs 9.3% for LIN (target: $540). For income investors, USAR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.04% vs LIN's 1.21%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.20 | $539.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.54 | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% |
LIN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). USAR leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
USAR vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USAR or LIN a better buy right now?
Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 33.
8x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USAR or LIN?
On trailing P/E, Linde plc (LIN) is the cheapest at 33.
8x versus USA Rare Earth Inc at 67. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USAR or LIN?
Over the past 5 years, USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) delivered a total return of +141.
8%, compared to +73. 9% for Linde plc (LIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +375. 2% versus USAR's +141. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USAR or LIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus USA Rare Earth Inc's 2. 18β — meaning USAR is approximately 806% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — USAR or LIN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: USA Rare Earth Inc grew EPS 39.
3% year-over-year, compared to 7. 1% for Linde plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USAR or LIN?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus -77. 4% for USA Rare Earth Inc — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USAR leads at 53. 6% versus 26. 3% for LIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USAR leads at 80. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USAR or LIN more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USAR: 29.
6% to $34. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — USAR or LIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 2% for Linde plc (LIN).
09Is USAR or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). USA Rare Earth Inc (USAR) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, USAR: +141. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USAR and LIN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.