Gold
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
USAU vs LIN vs APD vs GORO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Chemicals - Specialty
Gold
USAU vs LIN vs APD vs GORO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals - Specialty | Gold |
| Market Cap | $273M | $228.85B | $65.68B | $231M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $34.66B | $12.46B | $93M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-20M | $7.13B | $2.11B | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.0% | 32.0% | 18.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 28.8% | 18.4% | 13.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.7x | 22.5x | 28.6x |
| Total Debt | $34K | $26.99B | $18.41B | $91M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $5.06B | $1.86B | $25M |
USAU vs LIN vs APD vs GORO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Gold Corp. (USAU) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Air Products and Ch… (APD) | 100 | 122.1 | +22.1% |
| Gold Resource Corpo… (GORO) | 100 | 36.7 | -63.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: USAU vs LIN vs APD vs GORO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
USAU lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 375.2% 10Y total return vs APD's 166.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 67.9%, current ratio 0.88x
- 20.6% margin vs GORO's -6.9%
- Beta 0.24 vs USAU's 1.02
APD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 29 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.45, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.38x
- Lower P/E (22.5x vs 28.6x)
- 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
GORO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 44.0%, EPS growth 92.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -12.5%
- 44.0% revenue growth vs USAU's -100.0%
- +143.4% vs LIN's +11.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 44.0% revenue growth vs USAU's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.5x vs 28.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs GORO's -6.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs USAU's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 29-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +143.4% vs LIN's +11.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.3% ROA vs USAU's -58.1%, ROIC 11.3% vs -126.6% |
USAU vs LIN vs APD vs GORO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
USAU vs LIN vs APD vs GORO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
APD leads 2 • USAU leads 0 • GORO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN and USAU operate at a comparable scale, with $34.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GORO's -6.9%. On growth, GORO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $34.7B | $12.5B | $93M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | $12.1B | $3.9B | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$20M | $7.1B | $2.1B | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $5.1B | $1.1B | -$4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +46.0% | +32.0% | +18.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +28.8% | +18.4% | +13.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +20.6% | +16.9% | -6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +14.7% | +8.9% | -4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.2% | +8.8% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.2% | +13.4% | +141.1% | +193.3% |
Valuation Metrics
APD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GORO's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than APD's 119.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $273M | $228.8B | $65.7B | $231M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $265M | $250.8B | $82.2B | $297M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.22x | 33.85x | -166.67x | -30.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.67x | 22.46x | 28.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 19.75x | 119.66x | 11.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.73x | 5.46x | 2.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 16.37x | 5.82x | 3.79x | 4.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.97x | — | 359.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-68 for USAU. USAU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GORO's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GORO scores 7/9 vs APD's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -68.1% | +17.8% | +11.9% | -22.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -58.1% | +8.3% | +5.1% | -4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -126.6% | +11.3% | -2.0% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.4% | +13.0% | -2.4% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.68x | 1.06x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $21.9B | $16.6B | $66M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $5.1B | $1.9B | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34,410 | $27.0B | $18.4B | $91M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 34.52x | 12.00x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — USAU and LIN and GORO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,394 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,415 for GORO. Over the past 12 months, GORO leads with a +143.4% total return vs LIN's +11.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USAU at 55.1% vs APD's 2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.2% | +15.5% | +19.2% | +70.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.3% | +11.2% | +14.2% | +143.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +272.8% | +39.7% | +7.0% | +50.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.3% | +73.9% | +13.2% | -45.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.0% | +375.2% | +166.4% | -47.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.1% | +11.8% | +2.3% | +14.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIN and APD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAU's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. APD currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs USAU's 69.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.02x | 0.24x | 0.45x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.75 | $521.28 | $307.29 | $1.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.75 | $387.78 | $229.11 | $0.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +94.7% | +96.0% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 51.7 | 55.0 | 47.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 276K | 2.3M | 1.2M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
APD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USAU as "Buy", LIN as "Buy", APD as "Buy", GORO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.2% upside for USAU (target: $27) vs 6.0% for APD (target: $313). For income investors, APD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.41% vs LIN's 1.21%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.75 | $539.71 | $312.78 | $2.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 28 | 42 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 29 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 | $7.11 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). APD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
USAU vs LIN vs APD vs GORO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is USAU or LIN or APD or GORO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is the stronger pick with 44.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 33. 8x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate U. S. Gold Corp. (USAU) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — USAU or LIN or APD or GORO?
On forward P/E, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 22. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — USAU or LIN or APD or GORO?
Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +73.
9%, compared to -45. 8% for Gold Resource Corporation (GORO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +375. 2% versus USAU's -68. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — USAU or LIN or APD or GORO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus U. S. Gold Corp. 's 1. 02β — meaning USAU is approximately 325% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, U. S. Gold Corp. (USAU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Gold Resource Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — USAU or LIN or APD or GORO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gold Resource Corporation (GORO) is pulling ahead at 44.
0% versus -0. 5% for Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (APD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Gold Resource Corporation grew EPS 92. 3% year-over-year, compared to -143. 2% for U. S. Gold Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — USAU or LIN or APD or GORO?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus -6. 9% for Gold Resource Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus -7. 3% for APD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is USAU or LIN or APD or GORO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
(APD) trades at 22. 5x forward P/E versus 28. 6x for Gold Resource Corporation — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for USAU: 61. 2% to $26. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — USAU or LIN or APD or GORO?
In this comparison, APD (2.
4% yield), LIN (1. 2% yield) pay a dividend. USAU, GORO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is USAU or LIN or APD or GORO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +375. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +375. 2%, USAU: -68. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between USAU and LIN and APD and GORO?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: USAU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock; APD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GORO is a small-cap high-growth stock. LIN, APD pay a dividend while USAU, GORO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.