Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB vs GNK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
USEA
United Maritime Corporation

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$20M
5Y Perf.+19.4%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$342M
5Y Perf.+128.3%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+3.0%
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+79.7%
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+30.8%

USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB vs GNK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
USEA logoUSEA
SHIP logoSHIP
SBLK logoSBLK
SB logoSB
GNK logoGNK
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$20M$342M$3.09B$730M$1.10B
Revenue (TTM)$42M$153M$1.04B$275M$114.70B
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$15M$84M$46M$9.32B
Gross Margin22.3%45.4%33.0%36.9%62.9%
Operating Margin5.6%23.4%13.6%26.0%0.0%
Forward P/E6.9x8.0x12.6x14.9x
Total Debt$98M$290M$1.07B$537M$200M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$63M$500M$84M$56M

USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB vs GNKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

USEA
SHIP
SBLK
SB
GNK
StockJul 22May 26Return
United Maritime Cor… (USEA)100119.4+19.4%
Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP)100228.3+128.3%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100103.0+3.0%
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB)100179.7+79.7%
Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK)100130.8+30.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB vs GNK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: USEA and SHIP are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. SB and SBLK also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
USEA
United Maritime Corporation
The Growth Leader

USEA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and dividends.

  • 26.0% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
  • 13.3% yield, vs SB's 4.0%
Best for: growth and dividends
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Value Play

SHIP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (6.9x vs 14.9x)
  • +207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1%
Best for: value and momentum
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs SB's 7.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.73 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
The Income Pick

SB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 4.0%
  • Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.2%
  • Beta 0.98, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.91x
  • 16.8% margin vs USEA's -10.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthUSEA logoUSEA26.0% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
ValueSHIP logoSHIPLower P/E (6.9x vs 14.9x)
Quality / MarginsSB logoSB16.8% margin vs USEA's -10.2%
Stability / SafetySBLK logoSBLKBeta 0.73 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage
DividendsUSEA logoUSEA13.3% yield, vs SB's 4.0%
Momentum (1Y)SHIP logoSHIP+207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1%
Efficiency (ROA)SB logoSB3.4% ROA vs USEA's -2.6%, ROIC 6.6% vs 2.4%

USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB vs GNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

USEAUnited Maritime Corporation
FY 2022
Spot Charter
100.0%$9M
SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
FY 2021
Time Charter
81.5%$125M
Spot Charter
18.5%$28M
SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

SBSafe Bulkers, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited
FY 2025
Cargo and Freight
100.0%$342M

USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB vs GNK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUSEALAGGINGGNK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — SB and GNK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 2729.3x USEA's $42M. SB is the more profitable business, keeping 16.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USEA's -10.2%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricUSEA logoUSEAUnited Maritime C…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$42M$153M$1.0B$275M$114.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$68M$311M$131M$112M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M$15M$84M$46M$9.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0-$6M$209M$55M$15.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+22.3%+45.4%+33.0%+36.9%+62.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.6%+23.4%+13.6%+26.0%+0.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.2%+9.7%+8.1%+16.8%+8.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.6%-4.2%+20.0%+19.9%+13.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-5.2%+18.6%-2.7%-3.7%+1604.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.2%+84.4%+58.3%-31.8%+175.0%
Evenly matched — SB and GNK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

USEA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.4x trailing earnings, SB trades at a 77% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SB's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.4x.

MetricUSEA logoUSEAUnited Maritime C…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
Market CapShares × price$20M$342M$3.1B$730M$1.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$111M$570M$3.7B$1.2B$1.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-5.85x16.05x36.73x8.36x-252.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.93x8.00x12.61x14.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.02x7.38x11.87x6.96x14.38x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.44x2.16x2.97x2.37x3.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.33x1.18x1.26x0.90x1.22x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.69x20.11x14.73x
USEA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SB delivers a 5.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-7 for USEA. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to USEA's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs GNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricUSEA logoUSEAUnited Maritime C…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-7.2%+5.3%+3.4%+5.6%+4.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.6%+2.5%+2.2%+3.4%+3.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.4%+6.1%+3.2%+6.6%+0.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.7%+7.1%+4.0%+8.6%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953573
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.63x1.03x0.44x0.65x0.22x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$91M$228M$572M$453M$145M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$63M$500M$84M$56M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$98M$290M$1.1B$537M$200M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.10x1.68x2.08x2.34x0.00x
SB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GNK five years ago would be worth $19,536 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,207 for USEA. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs SBLK's +83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs USEA's 3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricUSEA logoUSEAUnited Maritime C…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+34.5%+79.9%+40.3%+44.6%+39.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+114.5%+207.0%+83.1%+110.5%+94.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+9.5%+282.1%+60.6%+105.9%+103.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.1%+65.6%+79.1%+94.6%+95.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.1%-99.7%+977.3%+765.0%+401.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+3.1%+56.3%+17.1%+27.2%+26.6%
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SBLK is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricUSEA logoUSEAUnited Maritime C…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.06x1.21x0.73x0.98x1.00x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.36$16.77$27.20$7.20$26.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.17$5.37$14.79$3.33$12.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.6%+96.6%+98.6%+96.3%+96.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.862.972.861.063.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded81K258K1.4M576K415K
SBLK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — USEA and SB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SHIP as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy", SB as "Buy", GNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.2% upside for SBLK (target: $29) vs -39.4% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, USEA offers the higher dividend yield at 13.31% vs SBLK's 1.11%.

MetricUSEA logoUSEAUnited Maritime C…SHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$29.00$4.20$20.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts3242222
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+13.3%+2.9%+1.1%+4.0%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00030
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.30$0.46$0.30$0.27$0.76
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.3%0.0%+3.2%+4.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — USEA and SB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

USEA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallUnited Maritime Corporation (USEA)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

USEA vs SHIP vs SBLK vs SB vs GNK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB or GNK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, United Maritime Corporation (USEA) is the stronger pick with 26.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB or GNK?

On trailing P/E, Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB or GNK?

Over the past 5 years, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) delivered a total return of +95.

4%, compared to +42. 1% for United Maritime Corporation (USEA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB or GNK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 66% more volatile than SBLK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 163% for United Maritime Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB or GNK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Maritime Corporation (USEA) is pulling ahead at 26.

0% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -26. 8% for United Maritime Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, USEA leads at 83. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB or GNK?

Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus -7. 4% for United Maritime Corporation — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USEA leads at 52. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB or GNK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

(SHIP) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 8. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SBLK: 8. 2% to $29. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB or GNK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

United Maritime Corporation (USEA) offers the highest yield at 13. 3%, versus 1. 1% for Star Bulk Carriers Corp. (SBLK).

09

Is USEA or SHIP or SBLK or SB or GNK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between USEA and SHIP and SBLK and SB and GNK?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: USEA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SB is a small-cap deep-value stock; GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

USEA

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 5.3%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHIP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 80229%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform USEA and SHIP and SBLK and SB and GNK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(USEA: -5.2% · SHIP: 18.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.