Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
UZD vs ECCX vs PFLT vs AMT vs CCI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
REIT - Specialty
REIT - Specialty
UZD vs ECCX vs PFLT vs AMT vs CCI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Asset Management | Asset Management | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $1.73B | $2.35B | $888M | $83.69B | $39.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.91B | $116M | $172M | $10.82B | $4.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $290M | $34M | $118M | $2.88B | $1.06B |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | 84.2% | 45.6% | 73.4% | 65.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.2% | 73.7% | 39.4% | 44.2% | 48.0% |
| Forward P/E | 22.5x | 29.3x | 7.9x | 27.4x | 43.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $272M | $1.78B | $44.96B | $29.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $113M | $42M | $123M | $1.47B | $269M |
UZD vs ECCX vs PFLT vs AMT vs CCI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZD) | 100 | 76.4 | -23.6% |
| Eagle Point Credit … (ECCX) | 100 | 103.1 | +3.1% |
| PennantPark Floatin… (PFLT) | 100 | 105.2 | +5.2% |
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 72.1 | -27.9% |
| Crown Castle Inc. (CCI) | 100 | 55.8 | -44.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: UZD vs ECCX vs PFLT vs AMT vs CCI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
UZD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 100.0%
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AMT's 3.7%
ECCX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 29.0%, current ratio 2.22x
- Beta 0.50, yield 7.0%, current ratio 2.22x
- NIM 10.2% vs PFLT's 5.0%
- 69.3% margin vs UZD's 15.2%
PFLT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 72.6% 10Y total return vs ECCX's 59.2%
- PEG 0.89 vs UZD's 4.58
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 43.9x)
AMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 11.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.3%
- 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs UZD's -95.7%
- 4.5% ROA vs ECCX's 2.2%, ROIC 6.9% vs 6.1%
CCI is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.26 vs PFLT's 0.79
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% FFO/revenue growth vs UZD's -95.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 43.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 69.3% margin vs UZD's 15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.26 vs PFLT's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AMT's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.4% vs AMT's -15.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs ECCX's 2.2%, ROIC 6.9% vs 6.1% |
UZD vs ECCX vs PFLT vs AMT vs CCI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
UZD vs ECCX vs PFLT vs AMT vs CCI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ECCX leads in 1 of 6 categories
UZD leads 1 • AMT leads 1 • PFLT leads 0 • CCI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ECCX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.8B annually — 93.3x ECCX's $116M. ECCX is the more profitable business, keeping 69.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UZD's 15.2%. On growth, AMT holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $116M | $172M | $10.8B | $4.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $63M | $39M | $6.9B | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $290M | $34M | $118M | $2.9B | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $65M | $242M | $3.8B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +84.2% | +45.6% | +73.4% | +65.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +73.7% | +39.4% | +44.2% | +48.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +69.3% | +38.7% | +26.6% | +25.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +137.8% | +89.3% | +55.4% | +34.9% | +64.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.8% | — | — | +6.8% | -4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +3.9% | +40.9% | +76.9% | +132.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UZD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.0x trailing earnings, UZD trades at a 93% valuation discount to CCI's 89.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UZD offers better value at 1.22x vs AMT's 4.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $2.4B | $888M | $83.7B | $39.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $127.2B | $69.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.01x | 29.27x | 12.43x | 33.33x | 89.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.51x | — | 7.93x | 27.41x | 43.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.22x | — | 1.40x | 4.57x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 30.18x | 37.66x | 18.32x | 24.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.62x | 20.27x | 5.18x | 7.86x | 9.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 2.51x | 0.77x | 8.14x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.66x | 22.70x | 9.34x | 22.12x | 13.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $3 for ECCX. ECCX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs ECCX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +3.1% | +11.2% | +27.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +2.2% | +4.3% | +4.5% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +6.1% | +2.1% | +6.9% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | +7.1% | +2.7% | +8.6% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.29x | 1.65x | 4.34x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $230M | $1.7B | $43.5B | $29.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $42M | $123M | $1.5B | $269M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $272M | $1.8B | $45.0B | $29.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.74x | 12.34x | 0.35x | 3.99x | 2.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — UZD and ECCX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECCX five years ago would be worth $13,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,519 for CCI. Over the past 12 months, ECCX leads with a +9.4% total return vs AMT's -15.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UZD at 18.2% vs CCI's -2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.5% | +2.6% | -0.4% | +3.8% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.3% | +9.4% | +1.5% | -15.0% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.2% | +30.5% | +18.2% | +3.3% | -7.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.7% | +34.6% | +17.2% | -14.7% | -34.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.9% | +59.2% | +72.6% | +113.8% | +57.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +9.3% | +5.7% | +1.1% | -2.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ECCX and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFLT's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECCX currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 0.50x | 0.79x | -0.04x | 0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.72 | $25.26 | $10.88 | $234.33 | $115.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.28 | $6.58 | $7.68 | $165.08 | $75.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.8% | +99.6% | +82.3% | +76.7% | +78.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 75.2 | 68.2 | 52.4 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 3K | 987K | 2.8M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — UZD and AMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PFLT as "Buy", AMT as "Buy", CCI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.4% upside for AMT (target: $216) vs 15.7% for CCI (target: $105). For income investors, UZD offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs AMT's 3.75%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $10.50 | $216.33 | $105.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 11 | 49 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +7.0% | +13.5% | +3.7% | +5.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $22.76 | $1.75 | $1.21 | $6.73 | $4.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.1% |
ECCX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). UZD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
UZD vs ECCX vs PFLT vs AMT vs CCI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UZD or ECCX or PFLT or AMT or CCI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger pick with 5.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD). Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (22. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UZD or ECCX or PFLT or AMT or CCI?
On trailing P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Crown Castle Inc. at 89. 3x. On forward P/E, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. wins at 0. 89x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069's 4. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UZD or ECCX or PFLT or AMT or CCI?
Over the past 5 years, Eagle Point Credit Company Inc.
6. 6875% NT 28 (ECCX) delivered a total return of +34. 6%, compared to -34. 8% for Crown Castle Inc. (CCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMT returned +113. 8% versus UZD's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UZD or ECCX or PFLT or AMT or CCI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. 's 0. 79β — meaning PFLT is approximately -2203% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. 6. 6875% NT 28 (ECCX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — UZD or ECCX or PFLT or AMT or CCI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is pulling ahead at 5.
1% versus -95. 7% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 grew EPS 823. 9% year-over-year, compared to -50. 6% for Eagle Point Credit Company Inc. 6. 6875% NT 28. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMT leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — UZD or ECCX or PFLT or AMT or CCI?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc.
6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) is the more profitable company, earning 178. 5% net margin versus 10. 4% for Crown Castle Inc. — meaning it keeps 178. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ECCX leads at 73. 7% versus -30. 2% for UZD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ECCX leads at 84. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is UZD or ECCX or PFLT or AMT or CCI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 89x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069's 4. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Ltd. (PFLT) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 43. 9x for Crown Castle Inc. — 36. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 20. 4% to $216. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — UZD or ECCX or PFLT or AMT or CCI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 6. 250% Senior Notes due 2069 (UZD) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 3. 7% for American Tower Corporation (AMT).
09Is UZD or ECCX or PFLT or AMT or CCI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 7% yield, +113. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 8%, PFLT: +72. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between UZD and ECCX and PFLT and AMT and CCI?
These companies operate in different sectors (UZD (Communication Services) and ECCX (Financial Services) and PFLT (Financial Services) and AMT (Real Estate) and CCI (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: UZD is a small-cap deep-value stock; ECCX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PFLT is a small-cap deep-value stock; AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CCI is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 9%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.