Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) vs Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NFLX | 15.9% revenue growth vs UZF's -95.7% |
| Value | UZF | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 26.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | NFLX | 24.3% net margin vs UZF's 15.2% |
| Stability / Safety | UZF | Beta 0.24 vs NFLX's 0.78 |
| Dividends | UZF | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; NFLX pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | UZF | -7.6% vs NFLX's -16.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NFLX | 19.8% ROA vs UZF's 5.9%, ROIC 29.8% vs -0.6% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Valuation efficiency (growth/$)
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
United States Cellular is a regional wireless telecommunications carrier providing mobile voice, data, and internet services primarily in rural and suburban markets. It generates revenue through postpaid and prepaid service plans (~80% of revenue), equipment sales of smartphones and devices (~20%), and roaming agreements with other carriers. Its competitive advantage lies in its established spectrum holdings and network infrastructure in underserved markets where national carriers have less presence.
Netflix is a global streaming entertainment service that offers original and licensed TV shows, movies, and documentaries. It generates revenue primarily through subscription fees — with three pricing tiers — and earns additional income from licensing its original content to other platforms. Its key advantage is its massive scale and data-driven content creation, which allows it to invest billions in programming that attracts and retains subscribers worldwide.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
UZF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). NFLX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 23.6x UZF's $1.9B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UZF's 15.2%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | UZFArray Digital Inf… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $430M | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $290M | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.6B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.5% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +137.8% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -93.8% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, UZF trades at a 82% valuation discount to NFLX's 32.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NFLX offers better value at 0.99x vs UZF's 1.18x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | UZFArray Digital Inf… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $350.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $355.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.80x | 32.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.36x | 26.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.18x | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.32x | 7.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.65x | 13.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.39x | 37.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $11 for UZF. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UZF's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs UZF's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | UZFArray Digital Inf… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.3% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.6% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.7% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $113M | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.74x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $15,346 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,995 for UZF. Over the past 12 months, UZF leads with a -7.6% total return vs NFLX's -16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 36.8% vs UZF's 12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | UZFArray Digital Inf… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | -9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.6% | -16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.6% | +156.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.1% | +53.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.1% | +772.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.6% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
UZF is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFLX's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UZF currently trades 85.4% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 61.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | UZFArray Digital Inf… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.24x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.59 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.53 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.4% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 40.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 41.3M |
Analyst Outlook
UZF is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | UZFArray Digital Inf… | NFLXNetflix, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $117.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 97 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $22.76 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +2.6% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | May 21 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | 100 | 71.9 | -28.1% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 165.82 | +65.8% |
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) returned +53% over 5 years vs Array Digital Infra… (UZF)'s -0%. A $10,000 investment in NFLX 5 years ago would be worth $15,346 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | $4.0B | $163M | -95.9% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | $8.8B | $45.2B | +411.7% |
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's revenue grew from $4.0B (2016) to $163M (2025) — a -29.9% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s revenue grew from $8.8B (2016) to $45.2B (2025) — a 19.9% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | 1.2% | 178.5% | +14739.7% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 2.1% | 24.3% | +1049.7% |
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's net margin went from 1% (2016) to 179% (2025). Netflix, Inc.'s net margin went from 2% (2016) to 24% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | 14.8 | 5.3 | -64.2% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 153.6 | 37.1 | -75.8% |
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 has traded in a 5x–41x P/E range over 4 years; current trailing P/E is ~6x. Netflix, Inc. has traded in a 30x–154x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~33x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Array Digital Infra… (UZF) | 0.56 | 3.33 | +494.6% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 0.04 | 2.53 | +5783.7% |
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's EPS grew from $0.56 (2016) to $3.33 (2025) — a 22% CAGR. Netflix, Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.04 (2016) to $2.53 (2025) — a 57% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 generated $3B FCF in 2025 (+312% vs 2021). Netflix, Inc. generated $9B FCF in 2025 (+7269% vs 2021).
UZF vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is UZF or NFLX a better buy right now?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) offers the better valuation at 5.8x trailing P/E (15.4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 97 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — UZF or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the cheapest at 5.8x versus Netflix, Inc. at 32.7x. On forward P/E, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 is actually cheaper at 15.4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Netflix, Inc. wins at 0.80x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's 3.13x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — UZF or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) delivered a total return of +53.5%, compared to -0.1% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF). A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth approximately $15K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +772.4% versus UZF's -0.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — UZF or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.24β versus Netflix, Inc.'s 0.78β — meaning NFLX is approximately 223% more volatile than UZF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 66% for Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — UZF or NFLX?
Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the more profitable company, earning 178.5% net margin versus 24.3% for Netflix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 178.5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29.5% versus -30.2% for UZF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48.5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is UZF or NFLX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.80x versus Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070's 3.13x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) trades at 15.4x forward P/E versus 26.4x for Netflix, Inc. — 11.1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
07Which pays a better dividend — UZF or NFLX?
In this comparison, UZF (100.0% yield) pays a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is UZF or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Array Digital Infrastructure, Inc. 5.500% Senior Notes due 2070 (UZF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.24), 100.0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (UZF: -0.1%, NFLX: +772.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between UZF and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: UZF is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. UZF pays a dividend while NFLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 9%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%