Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
VABK logo
VABK
CZWI logo
CZWI
NBTB logo
NBTB
BWFG logo
BWFG
FIS logo
FIS
KO logo
KO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

VABK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs KO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
VABK
Virginia National Bankshares Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$244M
5Y Perf.+78.2%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.52B
5Y Perf.+56.6%
BWFG
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$444M
5Y Perf.+249.9%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$355.61B
5Y Perf.+84.9%

VABK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs KO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
VABK logoVABK
CZWI logoCZWI
NBTB logoNBTB
BWFG logoBWFG
FIS logoFIS
KO logoKO
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology ServicesBeverages - Non-Alcoholic
Market Cap$244M$207M$2.52B$444M$20.26B$355.61B
Revenue (TTM)$83M$90M$902M$208M$11.66B$49.28B
Net Income (TTM)$19M$14M$169M$35M$2.67B$13.70B
Gross Margin69.0%54.7%73.6%51.6%37.6%61.7%
Operating Margin28.9%7.0%24.3%23.3%17.9%29.3%
Forward P/E12.7x11.8x11.5x10.3x6.2x25.3x
Total Debt$30M$52M$327M$180M$4.01B$45.49B
Cash & Equiv.$6M$119M$185M$225M$599M$10.27B

VABK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs KOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

VABK
CZWI
NBTB
BWFG
FIS
KO
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Virginia National B… (VABK)100178.2+78.2%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100156.6+56.6%
Bankwell Financial … (BWFG)100349.9+249.9%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100184.9+84.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: VABK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs KO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS and KO are tied at the top with 2 categories each (6-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. The Coca-Cola Company is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. VABK, NBTB, and BWFG also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
VABK
Virginia National Bankshares Corporation
The Banking Pick

VABK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 3.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 16.2%, current ratio 3.53x
  • Beta 0.48, yield 3.1%, current ratio 3.53x
  • Beta 0.48 vs NBTB's 0.76, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Financial Play

CZWI doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.1% vs CZWI's 2.9%
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: bank quality
BWFG
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BWFG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 6.1%, EPS growth 261.8%
  • 198.5% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 149.0%
  • PEG 0.24 vs VABK's 3.36
  • +57.3% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Value Play

FIS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and dividends.

  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Best for: value and dividends
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
  • 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Stability / SafetyVABK logoVABKBeta 0.48 vs NBTB's 0.76, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%
Momentum (1Y)BWFG logoBWFG+57.3% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%

VABK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
VABKVirginia National Bankshares Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
BWFGBankwell Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2019
Service Charges and Fees
100.0%$1M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B

VABK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs KO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 591.4x VABK's $83M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$83M$90M$902M$208M$11.7B$49.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$26M$9M$241M$53M$4.1B$15.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$19M$14M$169M$35M$2.7B$13.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$21M$11M$225M-$5M$2.8B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.0%+54.7%+73.6%+51.6%+37.6%+61.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+28.9%+7.0%+24.3%+23.3%+17.9%+29.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+23.1%+16.0%+18.8%+16.9%+22.9%+27.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.9%+12.4%+24.9%-2.4%+23.9%+25.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%+12.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+31.0%+63.0%+39.5%+2.1%+30.6%+18.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.5x trailing earnings, BWFG trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.29x vs VABK's 3.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Market CapShares × price$244M$207M$2.5B$444M$20.3B$355.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$268M$140M$2.7B$398M$23.7B$390.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.68x14.70x14.47x12.50x52.27x27.18x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.79x11.54x10.27x6.24x25.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.36x2.90x2.06x0.29x2.14x2.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.13x15.69x11.03x7.58x6.50x26.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.93x2.29x2.90x2.14x1.90x7.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.32x1.11x1.29x1.44x1.46x10.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF11.76x19.90x11.49x16.98x7.21x67.15x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. VABK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.0%+7.8%+9.5%+12.2%+18.4%+41.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.2%+0.8%+1.1%+1.1%+7.5%+13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.0%+2.0%+7.9%+8.0%+6.0%+15.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.6%+0.6%+2.4%+4.4%+6.6%+17.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9667667
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.28x0.17x0.60x0.29x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$24M-$67M$142M-$45M$3.4B$35.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$119M$185M$225M$599M$10.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$30M$52M$327M$180M$4.0B$45.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.94x0.16x1.05x0.49x21.16x10.70x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BWFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BWFG five years ago would be worth $21,150 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +57.3% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+15.2%+24.3%+17.6%+24.4%-38.9%+20.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+24.1%+52.1%+18.3%+57.3%-49.4%+17.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.9%+153.7%+48.5%+132.8%-18.9%+47.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+50.9%+69.0%+44.4%+111.5%-67.3%+65.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+146.5%+149.0%+108.5%+198.5%-25.6%+121.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.4%+36.4%+14.1%+32.5%-6.8%+13.7%
BWFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.48x0.50x0.76x0.65x0.61x-0.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$48.58$22.62$48.27$56.48$82.74$84.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$36.48$12.83$39.20$33.85$37.91$65.35
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.6%+94.9%+99.8%+98.5%+47.4%+98.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.051.263.163.330.860.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6K41K266K44K5.6M12.7M
Evenly matched — NBTB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", BWFG as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -4.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs BWFG's 1.44%.

MetricVABK logoVABKVirginia National…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…FIS logoFISFidelity National…KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.00$62.88$86.13
# AnalystsCovering analysts21033748
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%+1.7%+3.0%+1.4%+4.2%+2.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises16130156
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.40$0.37$1.43$0.80$1.63$2.04
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.0%+0.4%+0.3%+7.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

VABK vs CZWI vs NBTB vs BWFG vs FIS vs KO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is VABK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or KO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — VABK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or KO?

On trailing P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.

(BWFG) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — VABK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or KO?

Over the past 5 years, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.

(BWFG) delivered a total return of +111. 5%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +198. 5% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — VABK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or KO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NBTB is approximately -480% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (VABK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — VABK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or KO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — VABK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or KO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VABK leads at 28. 9% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is VABK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or KO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — VABK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or KO?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 1. 4% for Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG).

09

Is VABK or CZWI or NBTB or BWFG or FIS or KO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NBTB: +108. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between VABK and CZWI and NBTB and BWFG and FIS and KO?

These companies operate in different sectors (VABK (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and BWFG (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: VABK is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.