Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
VAC vs TNL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
VAC vs TNL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $2.65B | $4.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.64B | $4.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-342M | $237M |
| Gross Margin | 50.3% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.8% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $5.75B | $4.91B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $733M | $253M |
VAC vs TNL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marriott Vacations … (VAC) | 100 | 85.9 | -14.1% |
| Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) | 100 | 207.3 | +107.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VAC vs TNL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 4.1%
- Beta 1.83, yield 4.1%, current ratio 17.74x
- 4.1% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TNL's 3.4%
TNL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth -35.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.1%
- 158.7% 10Y total return vs VAC's 61.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.31, current ratio 1.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.1% revenue growth vs VAC's 1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 10.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.9% margin vs VAC's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.31 vs VAC's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs TNL's 3.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs VAC's +38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.5% ROA vs VAC's -3.5%, ROIC 13.0% vs 5.7% |
VAC vs TNL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
VAC vs TNL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TNL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VAC and TNL operate at a comparable scale, with $4.6B and $4.0B in trailing revenue. TNL is the more profitable business, keeping 5.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VAC's -7.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $591M | $744M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$342M | $237M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $737M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.3% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | +18.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.8% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.6% | +14.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VAC and TNL each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TNL's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VAC's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.7B | $8.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.74x | 19.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.34x | 8.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.91x | 10.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TNL leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TNL scores 6/9 vs VAC's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.5% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.1% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.89x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.0B | $4.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $733M | $253M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.8B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.31x | 1.56x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TNL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TNL five years ago would be worth $11,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,118 for VAC. Over the past 12 months, TNL leads with a +45.6% total return vs VAC's +38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNL at 26.2% vs VAC's -12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.5% | -7.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.0% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.9% | +101.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.8% | +14.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | +158.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.4% | +26.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VAC and TNL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TNL is the less volatile stock with a 1.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VAC's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VAC currently trades 89.4% from its 52-week high vs TNL's 81.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $86.33 | $81.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.58 | $46.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.4% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.1 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 560K | 760K |
Analyst Outlook
VAC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates VAC as "Buy" and TNL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.8% upside for TNL (target: $85) vs 6.5% for VAC (target: $82). For income investors, VAC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.09% vs TNL's 3.38%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $82.20 | $84.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.15 | $2.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.3% | +7.3% |
TNL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VAC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
VAC vs TNL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VAC or TNL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is the stronger pick with 4. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 3% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC). Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VAC or TNL?
On forward P/E, Travel + Leisure Co.
is actually cheaper at 8. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VAC or TNL?
Over the past 5 years, Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) delivered a total return of +14. 4%, compared to -48. 8% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TNL returned +158. 7% versus VAC's +61. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VAC or TNL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 31β versus Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning VAC is approximately 39% more volatile than TNL relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — VAC or TNL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is pulling ahead at 4. 1% versus 1. 3% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Travel + Leisure Co. grew EPS -35. 7% year-over-year, compared to -257. 4% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TNL leads at 4. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VAC or TNL?
Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 7% net margin versus -6. 1% for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TNL leads at 17. 8% versus 11. 0% for VAC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TNL leads at 27. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VAC or TNL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNL: 28. 8% to $84. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — VAC or TNL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 3. 4% for Travel + Leisure Co. (TNL).
09Is VAC or TNL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Travel + Leisure Co.
(TNL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3. 4% yield, +158. 7% 10Y return). Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation (VAC) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TNL: +158. 7%, VAC: +61. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VAC and TNL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.