Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VAL vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
VAL vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $6.36B | $1.84T | $79.62B | $32.68B | $63.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.21B | $1M | $35.71B | $22.17B | $27.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.00B | $-498M | $3.35B | $1.54B | $3.12B |
| Gross Margin | 22.3% | -8.7% | 18.2% | 15.3% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | -367.6% | 15.3% | 11.3% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 28.0x | 7.5x | 19.8x | 16.8x | 26.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.20B | $0.00 | $12.31B | $8.13B | $7.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $606M | $98M | $3.04B | $2.21B | $3.71B |
VAL vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Valaris Limited (VAL) | 100 | 391.1 | +291.1% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.9 | +32.9% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 169.3 | +69.3% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 174.3 | +74.3% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 260.4 | +160.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VAL vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 0.3%, EPS growth 170.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.9%
- 296.7% 10Y total return vs BKR's 186.8%
- 45.4% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
- +152.9% vs SOC's -36.8%
SOC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and value is your priority.
- 9.5% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 26.5x)
SLB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 2.0%
- 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57 vs SOC's 1.51
Among these 5 stocks, BKR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 26.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.4% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs SOC's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAL's 1.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +152.9% vs SOC's -36.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.3% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 10.9% vs -44.6% |
VAL vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
VAL vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKR leads in 2 of 6 categories
VAL leads 1 • SLB leads 1 • SOC leads 0 • HAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 28095.2x SOC's $1M. VAL is the more profitable business, keeping 45.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $1M | $35.7B | $22.2B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $457M | -$454M | $7.4B | $3.4B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | -$498M | $3.4B | $1.5B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $117M | -$611M | $4.8B | $1.7B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | -8.7% | +18.2% | +15.3% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | -367.6% | +15.3% | +11.3% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +45.4% | -391.5% | +9.4% | +6.9% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | -480.4% | +13.4% | +7.6% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.0% | — | +5.0% | -0.3% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +54.7% | -5.4% | -31.2% | +129.2% | +132.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VAL and SOC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.6x trailing earnings, VAL trades at a 75% valuation discount to HAL's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VAL's 10.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.4B | $1.84T | $79.6B | $32.7B | $63.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.9B | $1.84T | $88.9B | $38.6B | $66.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.62x | -3.07x | 22.57x | 26.09x | 24.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.00x | 7.50x | 19.79x | 16.85x | 26.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.82x | — | 12.07x | 11.37x | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.68x | — | 2.23x | 1.47x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.05x | 2359.43x | 2.89x | 3.13x | 3.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.36x | — | 16.60x | 19.55x | 24.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VAL delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. BKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAL's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VAL scores 6/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +36.1% | -113.8% | +13.9% | +14.6% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.3% | -28.9% | +6.5% | +6.1% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.9% | -44.6% | +12.1% | +10.2% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.9% | -37.5% | +14.3% | +11.6% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | — | 0.45x | 0.77x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $590M | -$98M | $9.3B | $5.9B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $606M | $98M | $3.0B | $2.2B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $0 | $12.3B | $8.1B | $7.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.30x | -2.28x | 9.40x | 9.19x | 9.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VAL five years ago would be worth $41,624 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,264 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, VAL leads with a +152.9% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKR at 33.1% vs SLB's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +76.0% | +9.5% | +32.7% | +32.8% | +35.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +152.9% | -36.8% | +61.8% | +105.6% | +77.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.4% | +26.5% | +20.8% | +37.4% | +136.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +316.2% | +32.6% | +80.6% | +82.6% | +175.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +296.7% | +32.4% | -9.2% | +16.2% | +186.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | +8.2% | +6.5% | +11.2% | +33.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLB and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLB currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.51x | 0.87x | 0.57x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $105.35 | $35.00 | $57.20 | $42.46 | $70.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.20 | $3.72 | $31.64 | $19.22 | $35.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +87.1% | +36.7% | +92.7% | +92.2% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 45.8 | 57.9 | 55.7 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 934K | 5.4M | 16.3M | 15.0M | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SLB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VAL as "Hold", SOC as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", HAL as "Buy", BKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 110.3% upside for SOC (target: $27) vs -20.5% for VAL (target: $73). For income investors, SLB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs BKR's 1.44%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.00 | $27.00 | $56.95 | $37.08 | $72.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 54 | 4 | 66 | 64 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.0% | +1.8% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.08 | $0.69 | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | 0.0% | +3.0% | +3.1% | +0.6% |
BKR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). VAL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
VAL vs SOC vs SLB vs HAL vs BKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VAL or SOC or SLB or HAL or BKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Valaris Limited (VAL) is the stronger pick with 0.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). Valaris Limited (VAL) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E (28. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — VAL or SOC or SLB or HAL or BKR?
On trailing P/E, Valaris Limited (VAL) is the cheapest at 6.
6x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — VAL or SOC or SLB or HAL or BKR?
Over the past 5 years, Valaris Limited (VAL) delivered a total return of +316.
2%, compared to +32. 6% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VAL returned +296. 7% versus SLB's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — VAL or SOC or SLB or HAL or BKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 165% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 77% for Halliburton Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — VAL or SOC or SLB or HAL or BKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Valaris Limited (VAL) is pulling ahead at 0.
3% versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Valaris Limited grew EPS 170. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, VAL leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — VAL or SOC or SLB or HAL or BKR?
Valaris Limited (VAL) is the more profitable company, earning 41.
5% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 41. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VAL leads at 20. 9% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VAL leads at 25. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is VAL or SOC or SLB or HAL or BKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 28. 0x for Valaris Limited — 20. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 110. 3% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — VAL or SOC or SLB or HAL or BKR?
In this comparison, SLB (2.
0% yield), HAL (1. 8% yield), BKR (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. VAL, SOC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is VAL or SOC or SLB or HAL or BKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57), 1. 8% yield). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +16. 2%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between VAL and SOC and SLB and HAL and BKR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VAL is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SLB, HAL, BKR pay a dividend while VAL, SOC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.