Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
VANI vs GKOS vs BRNS vs NVCR vs INVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Biotechnology
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Biotechnology
VANI vs GKOS vs BRNS vs NVCR vs INVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $72M | $7.85B | $27M | $1.92B | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $551M | $0.00 | $674M | $424M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-26M | $-189M | $-52M | $-173M | $504M |
| Gross Margin | — | 78.1% | — | 75.2% | 76.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -15.6% | — | -27.2% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $140M | $11M | $290M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $91M | $70M | $103M | $551M |
VANI vs GKOS vs BRNS vs NVCR vs INVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vivani Medical, Inc. (VANI) | 100 | 5.9 | -94.1% |
| Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) | 100 | 142.5 | +42.5% |
| Barinthus Biotherap… (BRNS) | 100 | 4.8 | -95.2% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 8.2 | -91.8% |
| Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) | 100 | 199.1 | +99.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: VANI vs GKOS vs BRNS vs NVCR vs INVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
VANI plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
GKOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 457.1% 10Y total return vs INVA's 94.9%
- 32.3% revenue growth vs BRNS's -100.0%
- +52.0% vs BRNS's -32.3%
BRNS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.13
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
- Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.3% revenue growth vs BRNS's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.9% margin vs GKOS's -34.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.0% vs BRNS's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.4% ROA vs VANI's -103.9%, ROIC 14.2% vs -94.0% |
VANI vs GKOS vs BRNS vs NVCR vs INVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
VANI vs GKOS vs BRNS vs NVCR vs INVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INVA leads in 2 of 6 categories
GKOS leads 1 • VANI leads 0 • BRNS leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVCR and BRNS operate at a comparable scale, with $674M and $0 in trailing revenue. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GKOS's -34.3%. On growth, GKOS holds the edge at +41.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $551M | $0 | $674M | $424M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | -$40M | -$36M | -$165M | $86M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$26M | -$189M | -$52M | -$173M | $504M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$25M | -$18M | -$36M | -$48M | $181M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +78.1% | — | +75.2% | +76.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -15.6% | — | -27.2% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -34.3% | — | -25.7% | +118.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -3.4% | — | -7.1% | +42.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +41.2% | — | +12.3% | +10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -6.3% | +71.4% | -100.0% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — GKOS and BRNS and NVCR each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $72M | $7.9B | $27M | $1.9B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $73M | $7.9B | -$32M | $2.1B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.81x | -40.90x | -0.41x | -13.80x | 6.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 11.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 8.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 15.47x | — | 2.92x | 4.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.78x | 11.69x | 0.37x | 5.51x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 9.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-20 for VANI. BRNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VANI's 1.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVCR scores 5/9 vs BRNS's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.9% | -26.5% | -63.8% | -50.8% | +46.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -103.9% | -20.1% | -48.8% | -16.5% | +32.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -94.0% | -9.2% | -174.5% | -16.4% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -65.2% | -10.3% | -46.6% | -28.9% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.10x | 0.21x | 0.15x | 0.85x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $961,000 | $49M | -$59M | $187M | -$282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $91M | $70M | $103M | $551M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $140M | $11M | $290M | $269M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -18.69x | -1808.55x | -96.80x | 63.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GKOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $495 for BRNS. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs BRNS's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.7% | +21.2% | -8.8% | +28.3% | +14.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.6% | +52.0% | -32.3% | +1.1% | +21.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.7% | +128.7% | -71.4% | -75.7% | +95.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.7% | +61.5% | -95.0% | -91.3% | +94.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | +457.1% | -95.2% | +30.3% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.3% | +31.7% | -34.1% | -37.6% | +25.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GKOS and INVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GKOS currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs BRNS's 22.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.20x | 1.28x | 2.20x | 0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.92 | $146.75 | $2.92 | $20.06 | $25.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.92 | $73.16 | $0.51 | $9.82 | $16.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.0% | +91.4% | +22.9% | +83.9% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 63.0 | 54.9 | 69.8 | 39.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 235K | 678K | 25K | 1.5M | 621K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VANI as "Buy", GKOS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", INVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 9.3% for GKOS (target: $147).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $146.67 | — | $33.50 | $37.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 24 | — | 15 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
INVA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GKOS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
VANI vs GKOS vs BRNS vs NVCR vs INVA: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is VANI or GKOS or BRNS or NVCR or INVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger pick with 32.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vivani Medical, Inc. (VANI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — VANI or GKOS or BRNS or NVCR or INVA?
Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -95. 0% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GKOS returned +457. 1% versus VANI's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — VANI or GKOS or BRNS or NVCR or INVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 1648% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 110% for Vivani Medical, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — VANI or GKOS or BRNS or NVCR or INVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is pulling ahead at 32.
3% versus -100. 0% for Barinthus Biotherapeutics plc (BRNS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to -18. 4% for Glaukos Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GKOS leads at 21. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — VANI or GKOS or BRNS or NVCR or INVA?
Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -37. 0% for Glaukos Corporation — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -23. 5% for NVCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GKOS leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is VANI or GKOS or BRNS or NVCR or INVA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99.
0% to $33. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — VANI or GKOS or BRNS or NVCR or INVA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is VANI or GKOS or BRNS or NVCR or INVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.
(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +94. 9%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between VANI and GKOS and BRNS and NVCR and INVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: VANI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GKOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BRNS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.